The burglar is an intruder and might threaten the lives of the homeowner and the homeowner's family, so it is right and proper that someone try to defend their home, and the burglar must suffer the consequences. The irony is, if Sweet awoke and found a single burglar in his home and defended himself, he would not be on trial today. But a White angry racial mob's implied threat seems harder for the state to understand. Sweet only used the guns he had bought to defend his property and family after the mob began to actually try to break into the Sweet residence, hurling stones through the upstairs windows. Can Sweet be blamed for panicking, trying to save his family and the home he tried to hard to build, and firing out into the assembled, angry mob? The prosecution will try to play upon your own fears, ladies and gentlemen of the jury. They will suggest that Sweet could have called the police instead of shooting -- the police that had allowed a mob to congregate on the lawn of the Sweet property. Six policemen were already standing there, staring at the stone-throwing crowd, but these officers did nothing to stop the intruders, not even the people who were throwing stones at Sweet's windows. The prosecution will try to play upon your fears of Sweet as an angry...
He is an ordinary homeowner and father. He did not come to Detroit looking for trouble, merely a better life. He had grown up in a state of the union where it was common to see White men kill Black men and go unpunished and hoped to find better life in this city.Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now