Organizational Behavior: Shift From Individual To Team Term Paper

Organizational Behavior: Shift From Individual to Team Behavior Traditionally, organizational behavior has been defined as understanding human behavior and the means of influencing individuals, singularly and in work groups. Hierarchical control and hierarchical referral have been common practice. More contemporary visions of organizational behavior have de-emphasized the role of the individual and hierarchical management in favor of team work and decentralization. When considering the merits of these two organizational behavior approaches, the real answer is that the old needs to be melded with the new. Teams still require strong leadership to prevent conflict that can cause the same degree of inefficiency as centralized hierarchies. However, the role of leader is vastly different from that of a hierarchical manager.

There are many reasons that companies are transitioning to team management. In complex operations with diverse business units, it's difficult for one person to manage everything.

Also, hierarchical management implies that a manager needs to be able to move up the hierarchy over time if that person has proved to be a success in his or her role. However, positions in a hierarchy require different...

...

An August 2000 Business Week article describes the decline of the Chief Operating Officer (COO) role, and the difficulty of a COO to rise to a Chief Executive Office position because of the different skills sets required for the two jobs. The article also goes on to mention that many believe that extra layers of management slow operations and prevent the necessary development and execution of a strategy that could change on a daily basis
While team management provides opportunities for better decision making and efficiency, organizations must take appropriate measures to make sure that this really happens. There's an equally good chance of conflict arising from team members that do not: openly communicate with each other; share common goals with team members; have the same expectations of how groups or individuals should behave; react well to status distinctions within the group; and/or have a sense of cohesion with the group. Comments organizational behavior expert Wilf Ratzburg on this issue, "Teams that are uncomfortable with conflict tend either to avoid it altogether or allow the conflict to drift onto any number of unrelated issues." Thus, teams can just as easily run into many of bureaucratic…

Sources Used in Documents:

Bibliography

Brady, D. (2000, August 28).

An executive whose time has gone: Increasing corporate complexity and the shift to team management are killing the chief operating officer.

Business Week, (3696).

Greene, C., Everett, A., & Ebert, R. (1985). Management for effective performance. Englewood Cliffs: NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Ratzburg, W. Team effectiveness and awareness of conflict. Retrieved November 15, 2002 at http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Forum/1650/htmlgroups21.html
Ratzburg, W. Team effectiveness and awareness of conflict. Retrieved November 15, 2002 at http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Forum/1650/htmlgroups21.html


Cite this Document:

"Organizational Behavior Shift From Individual To Team" (2002, November 15) Retrieved April 26, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/organizational-behavior-shift-from-individual-138857

"Organizational Behavior Shift From Individual To Team" 15 November 2002. Web.26 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/organizational-behavior-shift-from-individual-138857>

"Organizational Behavior Shift From Individual To Team", 15 November 2002, Accessed.26 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/organizational-behavior-shift-from-individual-138857

Related Documents

Organizational Behavior - Analysis of Problems with the Top Leader Team at Greenlife Whenever an organization changes in any way, central problems in organizational behavior often result (Rousseau, 1997; Barley & Kunda 1992; Goodstein, 1994). This is evident within Greenlife, where the top leader team is demonstrating some critical failures and lack of cooperation. Organizational moral behavior can only be obtained through a true "cooperative effort among all employees" (Holmes, et. al,

Organizational Behavior Case Study ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOUR Residential care facility's staff plays an important role in the daily lives of residents; unfortunately these facilities are usually faced with organizational obstacles and lack of information that prevents them from taking proper care of residents (Smith, 1998). This organizational behavioral case study is about a residential care facility which is part of a parent company that runs six different residential care facilities. The management of

Communication occurs at an inter-organizational level, an intra-organizational level, and between the organization and the community or society at large. For example, inter-organizational communications include the one-on-one discussions between coworkers. These communications can be purely related to the daily operations of the organization or they can be casual, to stimulate a friendly environment in the workplace. Intra-organizational communication occurs between two or more organizations. For example, an environmental group

Organizational Behavior John Watson Company Overview Dynatronics Corporation (formerly Dynatronics Laser Corporation) was started in 1979 with the initial intent of developing laser technology for use in medical procedures. Unable to acquire the necessary FDA approval required to market the technology the company turned to other areas within the medical rehabilitation market. Seeing an opening in the market for ultrasound electrotherapy technology the company soon found a distribution channel that could support the

Culture must not simply be inclusive to an organization. Organizational internal culture must shift with the larger national cultural context in light of the needs posed by globalization. Chapter 12: Strategic Competency and Organizational Design IBM, showed a constructive ability to engage in organizational learning. Despite facing political obstacles such as 9-11 and prejudice against technology companies after the dot-com bust it has remained a huge, complex technological powerhouse. IBM's longer-term

Flexibility, adaptability, and a global mindset cause my organization to behave in a responsive rather than hierarchical fashion. These organizational values conspire to create an organizational culture that respects education, values protocol and is detail-oriented, yet is not such a slave to the rules that it loses sight of human beings. After all, if the rules were absolute, there would not be different government laws and bylaws, depending on the