Q. How can I expand or advance the conversation by new insight or perspective?
I agree with you that the co-production of leadership mode suggested by Carsten & Uhl-Bien (2013) is a useful way of thinking about ethics as something that is not simply achieved via good leadership, but also via good followership. Good followers can and must speak out when they see poor ethical practices. The co-production of leadership, however, suggests that it is important not simply to speak out when a follower sees something that violates the articulated ethics of the organization vision statement, or in the ethics explicitly advocated by the superior, but when the follower wants the organization to elevate its ethical practices to the next level.
The problem arises when there may be ethical conflicts inherent in the organizations business model. For example, what about an organization with a sales-based culture that deliberately pits employees against one another to meet sales goals? Or an organization which sells an unethical product, or uses unethical processes to meet production goals, such as outsourcing labor to a country where very A good organization, I believe, will deliberately try to hire employees who follow the types of practice listed on the Followership Role Assessment and embody the types of ideals celebrated by Johnson (2022).
I think you...
…As you note, leaders themselves must have co-production beliefs (Johnson, 2022).Sometimes I feel organizations want the best of both worlds. As you note, passive followership is not useful, given that organizations need input and actively invested employees to thrive. But organizations may say they want genuine co-partnered followership, when they really mean that they simply want followers who work harder at being followers. Good followers offer additional suggestions and input to bolster the organizations core assumptions (such as cutthroat competition between employees is necessary) but co-production in leadership requires followers that offer a genuine, alternative perspective when it is needed. Regardless, this underlines the need for a positive organizational culture that is truly openminded about constructively critical followership, versus simply wants very active and engaged followers.
References
Reed,…
References
Reed, G. E. (2015). Expressing loyal dissent. Public Integrity, 17(1), 5 18. https://doi.org/10.2753/PIN1099-9922170101Johnson, C. E. (2022). Organizational ethics: A practical approach (5th ed.). Sage.
According to the authors, this can be done if employees are given a sense of importance in the organizations. Knowledge workers are already short in supplies and most competing rivals also compete to get the best human resource in terms of knowledge workers. It is therefore essential for any organization to retain this highly skilled part of their workforce and in order to do that organizations must eliminate the
organizational leader responsible for developing policies related to managing diversity through looking at: age, gender, race, ethnicity, religious and spirituality and the organizational functions of human resource, marketing, customer service. Over the last several years, human resources (HR) has been playing an increasingly evolving role in dealing with a host of different challenges ranging from: employee satisfaction to helping the firm adapt with changes in the marketplace. These factors have
Avoiding Mistakes Leaders in the organization with which I am familiar do not effectively avoid making mistakes. Rather, they always seem to be bumbling into problems without realizing what they are doing. As DiPrimio (2010) states, leaders who abuse their power by using force without relating to their employees cause more harm than good. They are perceived by their followers as uncaring tyrants. In the organization where I work, this is
Disintegrating Relationships Between Organizational Leaders and Employees Organizational leadership behavior towards employees can significantly affect their perception of the workplace, and contribute to the organization high performance and most essentially create and maintain a proper organizational culture that lead to the success of the organization . The good health of the organization depends greatly on the relationship between leaders and employees. However, the relationship that exists between organizational leaders and
The strategy has helped a limitation and a better control over the costs and it was subscribed by Neeleman himself, who only makes $200,000 a year in wages - quite low in comparison to other executives at international corporations. The second feature in the successful corporate culture implemented by David Neeleman was that of an increased focus onto the full satisfaction of the customers' needs and wants. Instead of prospecting
Leadership in Organizations Leader-behavior approach Leadership refers to the process of influencing other people towards attainment of organizational or group goals. Leadership entails three key factors: first, leadership is a process of social influence. It is non-existent without followers and a leader. Second, leadership requires that the followers act voluntarily. The nature of compliance is voluntary thus differentiating leadership from other forms of influence based on formal authority. Finally, leadership elicits behavior
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now