Personality Test Analysis My Scores On The Essay

Length: 5 pages Sources: 5 Subject: Leadership Type: Essay Paper: #63582909 Related Topics: Personality Tests, Myersbriggs Type Indicator, Test, Personality
Excerpt from Essay :

Personality Test Analysis

My scores on the "Big Five" model personality test are Openness: 96%; Conscientiousness: 86%; Extraversion: 27%; Agreeableness: 69% and Neuroticism: 37%. (John, 2009) On the Jung Typology test, my type is INFJ: Introverted: 89%; Intuitive: 75%; Feeling: 25%; Judging: 44%. (Humanmetrics) This was very similar to the Keirsey Temperament Test, which also classifies me as an INFJ, also known as the "Counselor." (Butt, 2010)

According to the analyses that accompany the Keirsey and Jung tests online, I am highly introverted, preferring the company of a few close friends to a group of people; I am a champion of the downtrodden with a humanitarian streak, and also possess a knack for languages. I have very clear perception and, for better or worse, readily grasp other people's underlying motives. My thinking is directed inward, which can be perceived by others as being cold and distant; at times I may be so inwardly focused that I am oblivious to the external world. On the other hand, I also may possess an unusually broad and deep set of talents and a deep and insightful empathy for others. My abilities for self-expression are better suited to written than verbal format, but I also possess ability for all forms of communication, and a personal charisma that can be very inspiring. (Butt, 2010)

According to the Big Five results, I am extremely open to new experiences and new ways of understanding. I am well-organized and reliable, but I tend to shy away from social situations. I consider the feelings of others, but am not unabashedly good natured and supportive. I am generally relaxed, but am prone to occasionally being high strung. (John, 2009) The Jung results propose that I would be well suited to a career in literature or the humanities. (Humanmetrics, 2008)

In terms of my position within an organization, I will tend to take on a great deal of


Most of the rest of the world, with whom I engage on a deep personal level, may not understand, or may misinterpret, the periods of withdrawal. In general, I ought to work well in organizations because I have a strong predilection for group harmony. (Keirsey, Keirsey Temperament Website - Portrait of the Idealist Counselor (INFJ))

I recognize many of the qualities highlighted in the test results within myself. Some of these qualities remain enigmatic to me even after years of reflection. On the one hand, I yearn to have deep personal connections with people and, whenever possible, to inspire. On the other hand, it is extremely taxing for me to be in large groups and to meet new people; I need a great deal of time to myself in order to feel balanced. In terms of an actual balance of daily commitments, there is a fine line to walk between engagement with others and engagement with myself and personal projects. Too much of either one can lead to severe burn-out. Organizations are built on relationships, however, and one cannot possibly expect to build deep personal relationships with as many people as are in any one organization. When I feel it is appropriate to be completely open and frank with people, I cultivate deep relationships readily and quickly, but again, not all work environments allow for or encourage deep and unique relationships.

Without the potential for this kind of personal connection, I shy away from social interaction in general. Further, I am often unaware (and occasionally do not care) about how I come across to others. This can be perceived as a chilly aloofness, and I have been told this on more than one occasion. As I have gotten older, I have learned how to interact on a more superficial level, but it has taken time and effort to recognize situations where this is called for, and focused consideration on how to go about doing it. That is to say, casual interaction is almost never actually "casual;" it always requires effort.

I am highly imaginative and highly intuitive. These traits, while having their advantages in certain kinds of work environments can also…

Sources Used in Documents:


BSM Consulting. (2010). INFJ Personal Growth. Retrieved 12 16, 2010, from

Butt, J. a. (2010, Aug 8). INFJ Profile. Retrieved 12 16, 2010, from

Humanmetrics. (2008). Jung Career Indicator. Retrieved 12 16, 2010, from

Humanmetrics. (n.d.). Personality test based on Jung - Myers-Briggs typology. (Humanmetrics, Producer) Retrieved 12 16, 2010, from

Cite this Document:

"Personality Test Analysis My Scores On The" (2010, December 17) Retrieved October 23, 2021, from

"Personality Test Analysis My Scores On The" 17 December 2010. Web.23 October. 2021. <>

"Personality Test Analysis My Scores On The", 17 December 2010, Accessed.23 October. 2021,

Related Documents
Analyzing NEO 4 Personality Test
Words: 2490 Length: 8 Pages Topic: Psychology Paper #: 66383257

NEO Personality Inventory – 4 (NEO-4) This personality test was formulated by tweaking the Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R). While NEO-PI-R provides information on the five personality domains namely Extraversion, Agreeableness, Conscientiousness, Openness to Experience, and Neuroticism, the NEO-4 only offers information on four of these domains. The omitted domain is Neuroticism. The developers of the NEO-4 test have indicated that the test is suitable for use in employment and personal

Personality Traits: Psychology-Personality
Words: 1856 Length: 6 Pages Topic: Family and Marriage Paper #: 32109549

Personality The term personality can simply be defined as a person's unique image; what makes them different from other people in terms of attitudes, abilities, capacity, interests, behavioral modes, and individual structures, and determines how they interact with the environment. It is crucial for people to identify and understand their own personalities, because only then will they be able to uncover those things that are important to them and which require

Personality Construct Development of a
Words: 923 Length: 3 Pages Topic: Psychology Paper #: 92637794

(Humans are often called 'social animals'). However, the test construct acknowledged the fact that no one is perfectly social or asocial but a mix of both characteristics. Extroversion and introversion are not necessarily either/or qualities, which has been one of the critiques of the Myers-Brigg assessment. In future forms of this extroversion inventory, creating a typology of different types of introversion and extroversion would be useful. For example, some

My Personality Traits Analysis
Words: 976 Length: 3 Pages Topic: Education - Higher Education Paper #: 14275144

personality profiles considered to be part of my strengths. The paper identifies and discusses the specific dimensions that influence my personal strengths and weaknesses. My Personality Strengths Conscientiousness and openness to experience are the strengths in my personality traits, I am freshman undergraduate student with the following personality profiles. Openness to Experience: Openness is one of my strengths in personal profiles that involves active to the imagination, preferring different intellectual curiosity, attentive

Methods of Measuring Personality
Words: 1166 Length: 4 Pages Topic: Psychology Paper #: 7797609

Personality Measurements Personality traits make up the characteristics of the individual. Schmutte and Ryff (1997) define personality traits as describing, "individual propensities toward stable patterns of behavior and thought, that often are neither inherently good nor inherently bad." Psychologists generally assess five factors of the personality, known as the Big Five personality factors. These five factors include neuroticism, extraversion, openness to experience, agreeableness and conscientiousness. There are multiple scales designed to

Personality Assessment Inventory Critique: MMPI-2
Words: 1904 Length: 6 Pages Topic: Psychology Paper #: 46661874

In fact, it is important to understand that the MMPI-2 must be administered as a whole and that one cannot consider scores on any one area of the test in isolation from a subject's other results. Moreover, it is important to recognize that while the scales may carry official names, they do not only measure the suggested disease. For example, the schizophrenia scale appears to measure the degree of alienation