Plato's Censorship Although Book III in Plato's The Republic is titled 'The Arts in Education', it has come to be known as the author's censorship treatise. In order to provide an 'ideal' education for the state's guardians, or rulers, and to ensure social and moral welfare of the citizens, Plato argues that art and literature should be censored. By controlling the creative output of artists, poets, and writer; and by amending or deleting their previous work, the state would ensure that, "some tales are to be told, and others are not to be told to our disciples from their youth upward, if we mean them to honor the gods and their parents, and to value friendship with one another" (p66). While agreeing with Plato's commitment to improving education, and with his belief in upholding social and moral values, this paper disagrees with the control and censorship of art, literature, or any other freedom of expression that exists within a liberal and democratic state.

The majority of individuals within any society tend to agree upon the vices and behaviors that are considered to be immoral and unacceptable, and the structures of legislation and social guidelines tend to deal with those that are not tolerated. However, within any group or community, there exists an enormous range and variety of personal and cultural values and morals which, in a democratic state, should not be under the control or censorship of a ruling minority. Just...

To oppress this freedom is the foundation of dictatorship and fascism, and even Plato, after asking that "the same control to be extended to other artists... And is he who cannot conform to this rule of ours to be prevented from practicing his art in our State, lest the taste of our citizens be corrupted by him?"(70), expresses signs of being unsure as to the correctness of his proposal by adding, "But shall we be right in getting rid of them?" (68)
Aside from the constitutional objections and opposition to any attempt by the state to 'permit' or 'prohibit' the literature that people may read, there is also the fundamental problem of; who is to act as the judge and jury on the definition of acceptable and unacceptable content? Presumably, as in Plato's theory, it would be those who rule; the guardians, and "persons of worth" (70). The dangers that this poses to liberty and individual rights include the obvious temptation of the government, or decision makers, to impose their set of morals and values upon the population through the choice of permitted and banned art and literature. In addition, this presents the rulers with a golden opportunity to create a censorship strategy that, rather than maintaining the existing values and morals,…