Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
¶ … Abolition of Man, C.S. Lewis argues that young people should not have their feelings severed. They should be able to coexist with their emotions. He believes that children need to have a foundation of sensitivity so they know right from wrong. The heart harbors sensitivity and the head is charge of justness. The head should overrule what is in the heart if necessary, but the feeling should still exist. Men are created without chests. They are told that they should have motivation and drive. They should achieve in business. They should be powerful rulers, yet they have no hearts.
We must ask several questions when considering Lewis' essay. What is the mind without the heart? What kind of rulers are we creating? What kind of men are we creating. It is true that min are focused on the after, the result of their labors instead of the process. They look at the monetary gain, professional acknowledgement, social pats on the backs. They do not heed the heart. The heart is left alone, cold and empty. Men are unfeeling. They should be rational with morals, love and sentiment. Books like the Green Book, Lewis argues, inadvertently give the message that it is unnecessary to express feelings. Feelings are somehow, wrong. The Green Book, somehow produces men without chests" (Lewis, 34). These are men with no morals. They have no values. They have no sense or obligation of right and wrong. Society demands and expects men to have consciousness and virtues. They are demanding emotions and feelings from...
What's more, because their emotions have been castrated in their youth, they are deceiving. They parade around exclaiming that they are men of morals. They profess that they have sensitivity. Horribly, they attest that they have emotional sensibilities. How could they have emotions when they have no chests? "We laugh at honour and are shocked to find traitors in our midst" (Lewis, 35).
In the second part of the book, Lewis states that it is a fallacy to say that moral judgement has no place in rational thinking. The author argues that morals are at the root of judging whether one would die for one's country. It is not purely a rational decision. There are some intangible reasons why a person would decide to live or die. The will to survive and what Lewis calls the preservation of society are based in instinct, not in reason (Lewis, 44).
Tao, he argues, is at risk because there is no "instinctive urge to keep promises or to respect individual life" (Lewis, 44).
Instincts should not be the sole ruler of man. Instincts tell men that they must fulfill sexual needs without any sense of recourse. Taboos or morals were put in place to temper this instinct. Men with no morals who break modern taboos risk their health and put a financial burden on themselves even with modern contraceptives. It takes more than instinct to rule a society. For the most part, people do not have the desire to preserve society. They do not aim to make sure that the…
Works Cited
Lewis, C.S. The Abolition of Man. Macmillan Publishing, New York, 1947
This leads him to a key precept of the text, that grammar education is far too deeply biased by its philosophical conceits, rendering it a poor educational standard in both disciplines. Such is the launching point for the larger focal point of the text, which revolves upon the argument that natural law such as that implicated by Judeo-Christian and Eastern philosophical value systems must be preserved against the dehumanizing impact of exclusively rationalist thought. This drives
They may know what they have done and freely confess to it, but a true understanding of what they have done is not really present. It is somewhat like the difference between knowing that jumping off the roof and hitting the ground will hurt, and actually making the jump and understanding what it feels like to hit the ground that hard from 10 or 15 feet up. The concept of
The manner in which consumer goods can affect human affairs, however, differs. While demand for certain consumer goods can lead to oppression, the way people demand consumer goods may also destroy oppressive practices. When Britons demanded sugar with no regard to the way sugar and coffee they enjoyed for the breakfast were produced, slavery flourished. But when the Britons began to demand goods that they believed were not causing
Civil Rights historian Steve Estes adds: "the ever-present threat of lynching for supposed sexual improprieties meant that their [Black male] survival could depend on their ability to mask their masculinity" (Estes, 2005). Being able to express one's sexuality and desire in an open, healthy fashion and not feel in danger of persecution, in Estes' view, is a critical, but often unacknowledged part of being a man. Closely guarding the rights
Electoral College System The Presidential Elections of 2000 have once again raised doubts regarding the effectiveness of the electoral college system. A straight accounting of the popular vote showed that Democratic candidate Al Gore had a lead of over 500,000 votes over his opponent, George W. Bush. The Supreme Court was thus forced to assume the role of electoral arbiter for Florida's vote count, which resulted in the latter's victory via
Suffrage Questions: 1. One of the first strategies that the Sentinels employed with the purpose of being heard was to relate to early twentieth century gender concepts that would provide political voice to women. Also, by emphasizing that they were an active part of the American society, they insisted that they should receive equal democratic recognition from the masses. Lastly, they took advantage of President Wilson's militaristic doctrine to turn their