Politeness And Females Gender And Its Connection Term Paper

Politeness and Females Gender and its connection with linguistic behavior has been a major subject of debate and discussion in research circles for last many decades. How men and women differ in the speech is an interesting topic that has been shown to have direct correlation with societal influences and conditioning. Women are conditioned to behave in a submissive manner and research indicates that it is because of this factor than biological construction that is responsible for women being more polite than men. A large body of research on the subject reveals that women generally use more polite language than men because they are expected to behave in a submissive, timid and less aggressive manner. Pierre Bourdieu (1977, p. 662) argued, "Politeness contains a politics, a practical and immediate recognition of social classifications and hierarchies."

Females are more polite because people in any setting are expected to use more polite words if they are in a subordinate position. For example employees are always more polite than employers, it applies in classroom setting too where students are expected to use softer language than the teacher. In the very same manner, females are socially expected to use polite language with more frequent use of 'thank you' and 'please' combined with hedges. It has been found that women use more hedges when describing something negative than man would- showing their respective use of politeness. Hedges are words than soften the impact of an otherwise harsh comment. For example describing someone as 'mean' or 'rude', women would soften the blow by using words like 'sort of' 'kind of' rephrasing the comment to sound something like 'he is sort of mean'. This helps them remain polite while using negative or harsh terms.

Brown and Levinson's (1978) model of politeness was the first serious work in the field of gender and its connection to linguistic behavior. They maintained that politeness is a device used by people to avoid 'face threatening actions' or to least mitigate the impact of the same. Brown and Levinson explain that, "face is something that is emotionally invested, and that can be lost, maintained or enhanced, and must be constantly attended to in interaction.'(Brown & Levinson, 1978:66) Therefore...

...

Women are more likely to avoid rude language in order not to risk face threatening. These two theorists divided politeness into positive and negative politeness explaining that the former 'anoints the face of the addressee by indicating that in some respects, Speaker wants Hearer's wants (e.g. By treating him/her as a member of an in-group, a friend, a person whose wants and personality traits are known and liked)," and on the other hand negative politeness "is essentially avoidance-based and consist(s) ... In assurances that the speaker ... will not interfere with the addressee's freedom of action.' (ibid, 75)
According to Janet Holmes (1995) politeness is used specifically to show concern, remain distant, and in some instance with a desire not to impose. Holmes observed the conversational patterns in one study in New Zealand. She measured amount of talk in both male and female TV interviewers as a measure of politeness and found striking differences. Male TV interviewers contributed for at least 50% of total conversation while women choose to speak only when it was necessary and gave interviewees more chance to talk.

Holmes (1995) also used Brown and Levinson's work to conclude that women avoid face-threatening acts more often than men and are thus more polite. She described 'polite people' as those who "avoid obvious face-threatening acts ... they generally attempt to reduce the threat of unavoidable face threatening acts such as requests or warnings by softening them, or expressing them indirectly; and they use polite utterances such as greetings and compliments where possible.'(Holmes, 1995:5) She further added that women are more polite than men as "Most women enjoy talk and regard talking as an important means of keeping in touch, especially with friends and intimates. They use language to establish, nurture and develop personal relationships. Men tend to see language more as a tool for obtaining and conveying information." (Holmes, 1995:2) Holmes also explained that women use politeness as "an expression of concern for the feelings of others.' (Holmes, 1995:4) and thus "women's utterances show evidence of concern for the feelings of the people they are talking to…

Sources Used in Documents:

REFERENCES

1. BAILEYR. (1991). Images of English. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

2. BOURDIEU P. (1977). "The economics of linguistic exchanges." Social Science Information, 16, 645-668.

3. Brown, P and Levinson, S (1978) 'Universals in language usage: politeness phenomena', pp.56-311, in ed. Goody, E. Questions and Politeness: Strategies in Social Interaction, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

4. Holmes, J. (1995) Women, Men and Politeness, London, Longman.


Cite this Document:

"Politeness And Females Gender And Its Connection" (2004, October 28) Retrieved April 24, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/politeness-and-females-gender-and-its-connection-58045

"Politeness And Females Gender And Its Connection" 28 October 2004. Web.24 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/politeness-and-females-gender-and-its-connection-58045>

"Politeness And Females Gender And Its Connection", 28 October 2004, Accessed.24 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/politeness-and-females-gender-and-its-connection-58045

Related Documents

Homosexual Interview The subject of this interview is a twenty-nine-year-old homosexual male of African-American descent, originally from Miami, Florida. He has been employed as a Certified Personal Fitness Trainer since his 1997 graduation from the University of Michigan at Ann Arbor, where he majored in Kinesthesiology and Movement Science and minored in Broadcast Communications. The subject seemed ideal for this interview because he is openly homosexual himself, but acutely irritated by the common

This was the most consistent pattern observed in connection with this experiment. The researcher concluded that this was a function of the convergence of two independent social norms and expectations: namely, the expectation of politeness with respect to the dependent variable (i.e. door-holding behavior) and the independent social norm and expectation that males will be chivalrous in their interactions with females in virtually all ordinary circumstances, including those involving

business culture and expansion trends that exist for American companies within New Zealand. The paper focuses on answering the following questions: 1. What are the major elements and dimensions of culture in this region? 2. How are these elements and dimensions integrated by local conducting business in the nation? 3. How do both of the above items compare with U.S. culture and business? 4. What are the implications for

Diversity in Organizations The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory (ASI) provides a tool to assess the attitudes and expectations of individuals in relation gender stereotypes and to generate a quantifiable score measuring the degree of latent gender hostility based on those scores. More specifically, there are two measures generated by this instrument: the first is a score of hostile sexism that corresponds to negative feelings toward women; the send is benevolent sexism that

Therefore, Americans seeking to do business with Saudi nationals would be well advised to research their prospective Saudi counterparts thoroughly but to make preparations to travel to Saudi Arabia first before actually initiating contact with Saudi business people. Doing so and calling after arriving in Saudi Arabia instead of initiating contact from abroad demonstrates awareness of and respect for Saudi business customs right off the bat and in a way

Men and Women Is a
PAGES 5 WORDS 1885

Such results of studies clearly show a paradox: similarities yet differences between language use by gender. Far from one coming from Mars and the other from Venus, men and women seem to come from different states in the same country. It is obvious that they grew up in different groups, which have subtle style differences. Yet, although subtle, the language differences have judgmental consequences. Observers perceive the female and male