This paper analyzes a political cartoon depicting the impact of the 2010 BP Deepwater Horizon oil spill on President Obama's approval ratings. The student interprets the cartoon's symbolism, argues that Obama's perceived indecisiveness — rather than the spill itself — drove his declining poll numbers, and connects public frustration to broader anxieties about corporate bailouts. The paper concludes with the student's own cartoon concept, in which Obama treads water while his accomplishments are overwhelmed by an approaching oil slick, symbolizing how the disaster overshadowed his presidency despite not being his personal fault.
This cartoon attempts to show that people are blaming Obama for the BP oil spill disaster in the Gulf of Mexico, and as a result, his poll numbers are declining. The cartoon symbolizes the frustration of those who believe Obama did not do enough to fight the spill or hold BP accountable for its negligence. It also illustrates that despite what Obama and his administration did to address the crisis, the event and its subsequent environmental impact began to affect him politically — even though the spill was not his personal fault.
The cartoon reminds the viewer that Obama was likely forced to overcome the enormous background noise generated by the spill in order to accomplish anything as a leader. Much of the world's attention turned to the disaster, and other important issues were no longer being addressed in a prudent or timely way. The artist may also be alluding to Obama's own disappointment in the public for connecting the BP spill directly to his responsibilities and actions as commander in chief — a conflation that, while politically understandable, oversimplifies the question of accountability.
The premise of the cartoon deserves scrutiny. Obama's poll numbers were not critically affected by the spill itself — rather, his perceived inaction and lack of decisiveness led people to view him as a "do nothing" president. This perception was especially strong on issues involving billions of dollars and large corporations that lobby for looser environmental regulations and sought to shift much of the financial responsibility for the BP oil spill onto taxpayers.
The public was already reeling from the recent Wall Street bailout, and many citizens feared that taxpayers would once again foot the bill — this time for the BP cleanup. It was this broader pattern of perceived corporate favoritism and government inaction, not the spill alone, that drove declining approval numbers. The cartoon, by focusing narrowly on the spill as the cause, understates the deeper political and economic frustrations that were shaping public opinion at the time.
"Counter-cartoon of Obama overwhelmed by oil slick"
You’re 64% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 1 section.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.