¶ … Psychology of the Bigot -- the Anti-Semite vs. The Racist
In "Anti-Semite and Jew," the existentialist philosopher John Paul Sartre, a gentile, analyzed the psychology of an anti-Semitic individual who hates Jews. He did so from the perspective of an outsider to the group he was examining over the course of his essay, as well as attempting to plumb the psychology of the 'insider' of this group. In "The Fire Next Time," James Baldwin examined the American racist's perspective from the point-of-view of the object of racial hatred and ostrication, namely his own perspective as a Black man in America. Both, however, attempted to relate the psychology of hatred to larger political concerns, in Sartre's case that of a biased and class-oriented French society, and in Baldwin's case that of the Cold War, which he suggested caused the fear of tragedy to intensify racial divisions in America.
At the beginning of Sartre's text "Anti-Semite and Jew," the Gallic author Sartre stated that the psychology of the bigot, specifically the anti-Semite...
In other words, the ails of society were coalesced and simplified in the mind of the anti-Semitic individual in a neat and enclosed ideological fashion, and focused upon Jewish persons within the community. The 'logical' remedy for this supposed state of affairs in the mind of the anti-Semite was achieved in a simple way, namely by depriving the Jews rights or of life and liberty.
Thus, by keeping Jewish persons out of certain economic and social activities, by expelling them from the country, or at the most extreme by exterminating all of them, such anti-Semitic actions created a false sense of an achievable remedy or success in the minds of individuals who felt alienated from their goals. Baldwin similarly argued that Black men and women became totem-like beings or signifiers rather than humans in the minds of racists, who cast Blacks out of the American imaginative and literal reality.
Sartre added…
