Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS) is a project involving examination of health departments and CDC (Center for Disease Control) of a given State. PRAMS was unveiled in 1987. This project gathers data relating to the experience and attitudes prior to, in the cause of and period immediately following a pregnancy. Data collected is always specific to a given State. The surveillance expedition takes care of up to 83% of Infant births in U.S.A (CDC, 2017).
When PRAMS was unveiled there was a serious national and statewide curiosity around infant mortality, reduction, and disparities. Prenatal care with State support had my interest as well. At the time there was no information in relation to States that would enlighten State or local program evaluation and development. PRAMS structure makes it possible for deep inquiry into topics of reproductive health compared to the extensive but limited information contained in birth certificates (CDC, 2013)
The community or population being targeted
PRAMS make available data that cannot be found elsewhere. The data collected is used in the identification of infants and women exposed to health risks, examining health status changes, and in the determination of progress made in enhancing infants and mothers health. Researchers make use of PRAMS data for investigation of issues emerging in reproductive health fields. Local governments and State government makes use of PRAMS as well for planning and reviewing of policies and programs designed for the alleviation of health concerns in infants and mothers (CDC, 2017).
Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS), is really a combined-setting monitoring program made to offer state governments with continuing, people-based, condition-specific info on chosen maternal actions and encounters that happen prior to and throughout pregnancy and throughout a child’s earlier infancy. Even though the fundamental PRAMS technique, which is made up of postal mail questionnaire with telephonic calls for non-respondents, has not yet altered, numerous state governments have increased their endeavors to find and make contact with sampled females to be able to sustain sufficient degrees of answers (Shulman, Gilbert and Lansky, 2006).
The population of concern for PRAMS is actually all new mothers who give delivery in their place of residence to a new live-born baby within the monitoring time period. A state’s delivery-certification document functions as the sampling-frame for determining brand new mothers. Ladies are sampled among two and 6 months right after having a baby. The PRAMS test is stratified to ensure that subpopulations of specific public health consideration are oversampled, like mothers of reduced birthweight babies and racial/cultural minority communities (Shulman, Gilbert and Lansky, 2006).
Background & clinical significance
Effect of the issue/topic on the client & community
Even though there are significant advances made in medical care, there still are substantial threats facing maternal, child, and infant health in the U.S. The most conspicuous challenge is the reduction of preterm birth rates. Preterm births have increased by an excess of 20 percent for the period between 1990 and 2006. Another challenge is the reduction of infant mortality. In the year 2011 IMR was still higher than IMR in 46 countries (Maternal, Infant, & Child Health, n.d.).
Noticeable progress has been seen in the U.S. in the past half-century in the alleviation of IMR. This said, however, more needs to be done in prevention of IMR. Preliminary data shows that in 2011 IMR went down overall to 6.05 deaths. This number does not, however, capture the extent of geographical and racial disparities. Black infants that are not of Hispanic descent experience death almost twice as much as infant deaths encountered in the white non-Hispanic infants. In addition to this, deaths associated with preterm births for black infants happen at thrice the rate at which the same death occurs among white infants. Looking at this from a geographical perspective infant mortality top quartile happens in the Southern States of U.S.A. (CDC, 2013).
Effect of the issue/topic on the health care system as a whole
Wellbeing and health of children, infants, and mothers significantly influence the wellbeing and health of subsequent generations. This can be an indicator of even more challenges in the health of a community, families and health provision institutions. In addition, the outcome of healthy birth, timely recognition, and management of health issues in infants is fundamental in the aversion of disability and death among children as well as enabling infants to grow to achieve their full potential (Maternal, Infant, & Child Health, n.d.).
The mortality of infants can be understood as the death of infant children prior to their birthdate. IMR is a measure of instances of infant mortality for every 1,000 live infant births. IMR does not only...
References
(What is Prams, 2017) CDC (2017). What is PRAMS? Retrieved February 9, 2018, from https://www.cdc.gov/prams/index.htm
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC. (2013). CDC Grand Rounds: public health approaches to reducing US infant mortality. MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report, 62(31), 625.
Kotelchuck, M. (2006). Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS): Possible new roles for a national MCH data system. Public Health Reports, 121(1), 6-10.
Maternal, Infant, and Child Health. (n.d.). Retrieved January 17, 2018, from https://www.healthypeople.gov/2020/topics-objectives/topic/maternal-infant-and-child-health
Robbins, C. L., Zapata, L. B., Farr, S. L., Kroelinger, C. D., Morrow, B., Ahluwalia, I.,.. & Williams, L. (2014). Core state preconception health indicators—pregnancy risk assessment monitoring system and behavioral risk factor surveillance system, 2009. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report: Surveillance Summaries, 63(3), 1-62.
Woodbury, R. M. (1926). Infant Mortality and its Causes. With an Appendix on the Trend of Maternal Mortality Bates in the United States. Infant Mortality and its Causes. With an Appendix on the Trend of Maternal Mortality Bates in the United States.
Shulman, H. B., Gilbert, B. C., & Lansky, A. (2006). The Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS): current methods and evaluation of 2001 response rates. Public Health Reports, 121(1), 74-83.
Abortion trends varied widely by state as well. "Teenage abortion rates were highest in New York (41 per 1,000), New Jersey, Nevada, Delaware and Connecticut. By contrast, teenagers in South Dakota (6 per 1,000), Utah, Kentucky, Nebraska and North Dakota all had abortion rates of eight or fewer per 1,000 women aged 15 -- 19. More than half of teenage pregnancies ended in abortion in New Jersey, New York and
" As to the statistics on violence against women in terms their ethnicity, the report indicated "no consistent pattern" with regard to race. Regarding abuse visited upon a woman in the year preceding her pregnancy, estimates range from 4 to 26% of the females indeed were abused in that time frame, according to the study. Clearly, there is a wide gap in these estimates, indicating the need for additional research. Meanwhile, is
In the twenty-first century, women should have easy access to available resources to assist them in their pregnancy. In addition, available technology to detect difficulties during pregnancies is widespread in the medical field; however, disadvantaged women in Atlanta, Georgia do not benefit from these resources. Each year, maternal care expands in resources and knowledge. Equipped physicians can diagnose birth defects long before a mother gives birth. Absurdly, poor twenty-first
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now