Psychologists and Jury Selection
Jury selection is basically a process that involves three stages which include voir dire, developing a list of eligible citizens and choosing those to call in a specific case. Voir dire is an Anglo-Norman phrase that means to speak the truth and is used for prospective jurors who are assessed under oath. In most cases, jury selection starts with venire i.e. The selection of a panel of prospective jurors. Once the panel of potential jurors is chosen from eligible citizens or other sources based on whether it's a federal or state court, another panel of 6-12 jurors is chosen for a particular case. This second selection process is basically conducted for the purpose of choosing a balanced and representative panel. During this process of examination by the judge and attorneys, the partial or prejudiced jurors are eliminated (Flowe, n.d.).
In addition to eliminating jurors related to the case, potential jurors are also disqualified from service for cause. Notably, attorneys are usually given a specific number of authoritative challenges that permit them to eliminate without reason a specific number of potential jurors from the ultimate juror. The three main objectives of the voir dire process in jury selection is to obtain information from jurors, develop relationships between attorneys and jurors, and teach the jury about the prosecution's and defense's case. One of the major aspects in jury selection that has developed in the recent years is the psychologists in the selection process.
Roles of Psychologists in Jury Selection:
Throughout history, psychologists have continued to play various important roles in the criminal justice system. Psychologists have helped other professionals and agencies in the evaluation...
Community policing is a strategy that requires both new attitudes and commitments from citizens and new attitudes and commitments from police officers. It builds on the basic practices of policing by emphasizing cooperation between the police department and the citizenry, by emphasizing the prevention of crimes as opposed to just catching perpetrators, and by developing long-term solutions to existing and potential problems in the community (U.S. Department of Justice [DOJ],
"One U.S. Court said this of the problems with eyewitness identification: 'We think it is evident that an identification of an accused made by a witness for the first time in the courtroom may often be of little testimonial force as the witness may have had opportunities to see the accused and to have heard him referred to by a certain name; whereas a prior identification, considered in connection
" (Linder, 1) By and large, Simpson's history would support the argument which might have been levied by forensics psychologists that, in addition to the circumstantial evidence connecting him to the murders and his suspect behavioral pattern at the inception of the investigation, Simpson did have a behavioral history that suggests mental illness and the psychological makeup to commit the double-homicide. Quite certainly, indications of his temperament, of his tendency toward
Gay Serial Killers Serial killers continue to hold a fascination on the American public. The crimes of this subset of murderers are frequently sexualized in nature, which perhaps adds to the titillation in media coverage. It is worth observing that many of the most widely-publicized serial murder cases of the past fifty years or so have involved gay or lesbian serial killers: Jeffrey Dahmer remains a household name even in 2014,
Social psychologists have shown that a group can be heavily influenced by the dominating, authoritarian decision making of one or more strong supporters of the death penalty. Despite the democratic process of picking jury members, many typical jury selection practices later lead the group of twelve picked to be of a certain caliber, based on the characteristics of those chosen and how those characteristics relate within a group setting. Since
Psychologists’ Roles, the Law, and Juries 1 The role of the psychologist as a consultant in jury selection is like that of an advisor: the psychologist assesses the pool of jurors, their responses to questions put to them by the defense or prosecution, the demographics, and the demographic that would be most favorable to the defense or the prosecution. The psychologist then gives advice to either side in terms of describing which
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now