Quiet American in Book And Film
Although Fowlair, the narrator of Graham Greene's The Quiet American, refers to Phuong as "invisible like peace," (29) Australian filmmaker Phillip Noyce's 2002 film of the same name begins by displaying Phuong's face in the midst of a flame -- or more to the point -- a passionate, raging fire that explodes out of a home, tearing down its walls and roof. Ironically, Greene's Fowlair quips, "One always spoke of her…in the third person as though she were not there" (29). But for Noyce's Fowlair, it would seem she is very much there. American Joseph L. Mankiewicz's 1958 film, however, begins and ends without Phuong. She is spoken of in the beginning, and in the end rejects the British correspondent. Both films alter the text to form their own narrations. The novel, however, conveys a complexity and depth not found in either film. This paper will analyze the challenges posed by adaptation, compare and contrast the three versions of The Quiet American, and show how both films communicate to audiences conversant with the original.
The challenges posed by adaptation can best be seen in the character of Fowlair. Fowlair is played by Michael Caine, in Phillip Noyce's adaptation, and Caine gives Fowlair an air that is slightly more dramatic than Greene's. Caine's voice over narration begins the film by stating that he has fallen in love with Vietnam, and that in Vietnam you can get anything in exchange for your soul.
Greene's Fowlair, however, is of a different mold -- hardly so theatrical, significantly more indifferent -- though still a character who talks of love. Yet Greene's Fowlair is not so much in love with a place -- or even with a woman: the novel is not called Phuong; nor is it called Vietnam. It is called The Quiet American, and it is Pyle (the American) that draws the story out of Fowlair -- it his death that makes...
Greene's Fowlair has lost all such belief; his solace is in opium and Death; which makes Noyce's Fowlair appear like a new creation -- one who speaks of the soul as if it were something that could be saved or lost.
In fact, while Greene's narrator is portrayed as a somewhat rundown, semi-aloof, disillusioned but not bitter, easy-going but reflective journalist; Noyce's version of the same man might just as well be called the quiet British: Caine is serious, stiff, stoic, reserved, calm. There is little sense of the internal struggle represented in Greene's Fowlair. Caine's Fowlair would suggest no foul air at all. Caine's Fowlair wears a face of complete togetherness -- not one that suggests some things may be coming apart at the seams. What is coming apart in Greene's novel, however, is Fowlair's own disillusioned conviction. If Graham Greene is the questioning Catholic author struggling with belief and unbelief, Fowlair is a good representation of unbelief falling in love with belief -- only to watch it die and be reborn in himself: "It's a strange poor population God has in his kingdom, frightened, cold, starving…but then I thought: it's always the same wherever one goes -- it's not the most powerful rulers who have the happiest populations." Thus, Greene's Fowlair may feign disinterest, but as the narrative makes clear, his interest and love for the same man who took his woman may be more than anyone's. Fowlair is a man who has as much conviction as Pyle -- Fowlair is afraid only of commitment. By the end of the novel -- he makes another commitment despite himself to Phuong.
Noyce's Pyle for that matter, played by the goofy but lovable Brendan Fraser, is hardly the same as Greene's Pyle -- who, on the contrary is more like Noyce's Fowlair. Greene's Pyle is the epitome of action and intention, conviction and commitment, fortitude and perseverance, however misguided. Greene's Pyle is in a sense like an American-educated Don Quixote, riding off to do battle with windmills. Fraser captures little of this essence, conveying only good-natured brawn and determination. Then again, Fraser and Caine and Noyce are making a film, a different medium entirely --…
American Psycho In his seminal work American Psycho, Bret Easton Ellis uses the character of the yuppie serial killer Patrick Bateman in order to criticize American consumer culture while simultaneously challenging the reader to confront his or her own responses to that culture, responses that Ellis seems to suggest are only removed from the sociopathic actions of Bateman in a manner of degree, rather than kind. To see how Ellis uses
These films. Swing Vote (2008), The Queen (2006) Rules of Engagement (2000) The Quiet American (2002) and Jarhead (2005) clearly support this hypothesis and build on the idea that art reflects life and life reflects art. Resources Boggs, C. & Pollard, T. (2006) The Hollywood War Machine: U.S. Militarism and Popular Culture Boulder CO: Paradigm Publishers Bellah, R.N. Madsen, R. Sullivan, W.M. Swidler, A. Tipton, S.M. (1991) Good Society New York: Random House. Fishman,
Jane Eyre Movie A new version of Jane Eyre has just been directed by Cary Joji Fukunaga who directed Sin Nombre and the screenwriter Moira Buffini who is best known for Tamara Drewe (Jane Eyre, N.d.). The story is set in the nineteenth century and is based on a novel by English writer Charlotte Bronte. It was originally published on October 16th, 1847 by Smith, Elder & Co. Of London, England,
The puppets enable Fugui to regain his self-esteem and give him a sense of creativity, as he is now capable of articulating his thoughts through the puppets. He is able to make a better living as a traveling entertainer than as a seller of needles and thread. When it became too painful to live in his old town where he was once so wealthy, Fugui flees and goes on the
Like other symbols of the civil rights movement such as the song "We shall overcome" and peaceful sit-ins, to Kill a Mockingbird quickly assumed a similar position. As the focus of the movie was on right and wrong, the director of this film, Robert Mulligan, provided the American movie viewing public with a strong lesson in justice but he was also able, largely through the character of Atticus Finch, to
The interaction between the two is also symbolic of the innocence of the prewar state. Before the war, interactions and romantic interludes between Jew and Caucasian were no problem. During the war, however, Jews were marginalized to the point where they were no longer recognized as human beings. This is symbolized by the harsh treatment of an old Jewish man by a Nazi soldier, also during the beginning scenes.