RDD Radiological Dispersal Devices RDD  Assessment

Entitled, Al Qaeda Still Wants a Dirty Bomb, the article states that, "Denying terrorists access to radiological materials that can be used in a dirty bomb attack -- one that could bring our economy to a standstill and render areas uninhabitable for decades -- is a major security challenge" ( Al Qaeda Still Wants a Dirty Bomb). In order to deal with this threat there have been a number of international treaties put in place. These fall under the general heading of the reduction of the proliferation of nuclear materials for weapons of mass destruction. These include the following:

The Convention on the Physical Protection of Nuclear Material. This was adopted in 1987 and was intended to set international standards for securing nuclear material in trade and commerce. It is important to note that in 2005 the "…Parties extended the scope of the Convention to include nuclear material in domestic use, storage, and transport, as well as the protection of nuclear material and facilities from sabotage" (Nikitin, 2010).

The Proliferation Security Initiative (PSI) was initiated by President Bush in 2003. This initiative was intended to "…increase international cooperation in interdicting shipments of weapons of mass destruction (WMD), their delivery systems, and related materials" (Nikitin, 2010). At present a total of 95 counties have committed themselves to...

...

As Nikitin (2010) states, although there are a number of international trestles on this issue, "… none are universal, and together they make up a patchwork approach to the problem to date" (Nikitin, 2010). This is a matter for grave concern in a world which is becoming more diverse and complex, and where the possibly of the use of a "dirty nuke" becomes a real possibility.

Sources Used in Documents:

References

Al Qaeda Still Wants a Dirty Bomb. (July 22, 2010) Retrieved from http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704201604575373270385490484.html

Nikitin M. ( 2010) Securing Nuclear Materials: The 2010 Summit

and Issues for Congress. Retrieved from http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/nuke/R41169.pdf

Radiological Dispersal Devices (RDDs): Dirty Bomb, Other Dispersal Methods.
Retrieved from http://www.remm.nlm.gov/rdd.htm
RADIOLOGICAL WEAPON. Retrieved from http://tripatlas.com/Radiological_weapon
Radiological Weapon: History. Retrieved from http://www.servinghistory.com/topics/radiological_weapon::sub::History
Terrorism - Nuclear and Radiological Attack. Retrieved from http://www.utm.edu/alerts/nuclear.php


Cite this Document:

"RDD Radiological Dispersal Devices RDD " (2010, August 02) Retrieved April 26, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/rdd-radiological-dispersal-devices-rdd-9302

"RDD Radiological Dispersal Devices RDD " 02 August 2010. Web.26 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/rdd-radiological-dispersal-devices-rdd-9302>

"RDD Radiological Dispersal Devices RDD ", 02 August 2010, Accessed.26 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/rdd-radiological-dispersal-devices-rdd-9302

Related Documents

Given the size of the industry, this would have devastating effects not only upon lives, but also upon the economy of the country. Because of its size, it would be very easy to hold a nuclear bomb in a container. Terrorists have several plausible avenues of obtaining bombs; they could approach Russia or Pakistan, or build their own. 1. Airport operators have a responsibility to maximize the security at their facilities.

However, with large nuclear weapons the majority of the harm is caused by the explosion itself and the harm caused by the radioactivity is peripheral, although obviously still potentially horrific.) The damage caused by a dirty bomb would be twofold: There would be damage caused by the conventional parts of the bomb (in this case, the det cord) and damage caused by the radioactive elements. A dirty bomb's effects would