Responding To Clinical And Ethical Dilemmas Essay

¶ … MSW college Addressing internalized oppression as a presenting problem

Understanding and significance

The domain in which social workers practice and the outcomes achieved therein are hence-based essentially on the relationships forged and nurtured, irrespective of any interceding elements or theoretical methodology being followed. Social workers often face queries on ethical and moral grounds, specifically when faced with the power transactions that pervade within communities; that more often than not are in contrast to their own professional ethics. Mullaly (2002) explains this predicament lucidly- oppression, "is the subservience practiced on large groups by more powerful (economically, politically, culturally and socially) class as perceived by the public in general." (p.27). Work in the domain of emancipation of the oppressed class requires an understanding of the cause and effect of the manifestation on the societal as well as personal psyche. The philosophy of oppression and consequent oppression mostly revolve around, predominantly, feminism, radicalism, racism, structural and liberatory structures (Campbell, 2003). Professionals in the social work domain, too, hold power by way of their knowledge, status and training; however, it is by no means oppressive.

3 salient factors

Professionals in the social sector carry a special viewpoint when approaching work in relation to people, families, communities, or societies. Through our practices, we utilize our insight to influence change (individually and in the immediate system), by making people aware of their capacity in causing change, and to lessen, avert and wipe out abuse in our societal and community level structures. It is the skill of the social worker to achieve realistic balance in the domain he operates, in the face of inevitable power differentials pervading the area of concern. As laid out in the Code of Ethics, social specialists build proper limits involved with clients and guarantee that the clients gain because of the relationship they enter into (National Association of Social Workers, 1999).

Interpersonal and relational implications to client/practitioners working alliance

Conscientious social workers draw on the professional perspectives on morals, standards, practice techniques, and the personal environment. It exhibits the calling's main goal to advance social and monetary equity by empowering under-privileged clients who are under duress owing to persecution or susceptibility. Social work requires the expert utilization of self to restore, keep up, and upgrade the organic, mental, social, and spiritual working of people, families, and gatherings. Social workers are generally mindful of and alert to different ideas of obvious oppressive forces and behaviors like marginalization, bias, ethnocentrism, ostracization, and abuse. Many professional in the social work domain perceive their role as tending to these or other relevant issues. As a calling, social work has customarily been looked up to for authority and support in adjusting and altering the conditions that obstruct human potential and honor (Goldstein, 2010).

Extent practitioners can use anti-oppressive lens

A sustainable and inclusive social development will be the most effective way to foster change. To begin with, this is a common hurdle for the social worker that seeks their attention. The new test for the calling is to handle subtler manifestations of prejudice that are less blatant than subjugation or isolation. To a greater degree, the social customs and values that are imbued in the helping professionals' structure, block dynamic advancement of the sorts of prejudice that are clearly more apparent and pervasive (National Association of Social Workers, 1999). On the other hand, social work professionals and their organizations can apply designed methodologies to charter course corrections at the personnel, organizational, social and community levels. The particular undertakings are subject to criterion for intercession and the specific conditions governing that element (Goldstein, 2010).

Mindful implications for ongoing work

The practices, in which social work is, employed, constituted and assessed are largely influenced by contemporary thoughts and methodologies of both "hazard" and "power" that are both dynamic and significant as long as social work domain is concerned. It is perceived as a manifestation of action, which occupies an uncertain and indeterminate position at the interface between the individual and the society, and between the ignored and the standard. Expanding on this, 'power' implants social work thoughts and practices in various different ways, connecting and spanning 'individual', "positional" and "social" spaces (Smith, 2010).

Responding to clinical and ethical dilemmas

Understanding and significance

Social workers bear four basic obligations: to society, to the profession, to clients and, to self. The social workers need to identify themselves with the profession. Of late, social workers have revitalized their attitudes about ethical...

...

Most of those practicing in the social work were not taught about moral limits, practices, and dilemmas in their learning days, which however are being compensated for in the continuing education programs these days. Today's social work students and social workers are taught the best structures to help take difficult decisions and identify moral and ethical dilemmas. Consequent to the changes across state laws and the requirements of healthcare social workers, NASW has established applicable standards of practice across all fields and domains. These standards are expected to be realized and adhered to by all healthcare social workers (NASW, 1999).
3 salient factors

The background for some moral queries of emotional healthcare workers is the way that we depend, on income, for our profession goals, and, to some degree, for our emotional, spiritual and mental prosperity, owing to the inconveniences and agonies being faced by other individuals. This is valid, also, in other professions, for example, doctors and attorneys, and it raises the same essential moral and ethical issues for all such professional groups: conflict between interests of patients or clients pitted against self-interest. These correspondences obligate guardian commitments (Kutchins, 1991) in which specific strictures are important to secure patients' or clients' exploitation mentally, economically, physically, or from legal misery. A number of the strictures in the morals and ethical codes address these specific issues in respective professions (Freud & Krug, 2002).

Complexities of Ethical Decision Making in Social Work Practice: moral issues emerge irrespective of their work situations and capabilities, the settings in which they work, or the populace they serve (NASW, 1999). The Code is addressed under six distinctive segments: social specialists' moral obligation to clients; to associates; as experts; to the social work profession; and to the society. It is not clear why such an association was picked, as these areas overlap invariably, and at the same time, do not compare clearly to the natural courses in which we experience ethical and moral queries. It requires a procrustean push to find the relevance of the particular moral issue to the ones found in the Code's moral models. As an alternative, a more helpful structuring would have been one around the significant clashes experienced in social work areas, for instance: issues of limits and barriers and those of self-interest.

Guidelines of the Code of Ethics (NASW, 1999) contain numerous prescriptive articulations expected of a conscientious social worker. Certain provisions are strictly abhorred, for example, "giving or appropriating considerations in exchange of a referral" (segment 2.06). Others, for example, the denial against bargaining, perceive circumstances in which such a disallowance may be crossed. We view it as quality of the code, in this unverifiable world, that most remedies are not rigid and allow for deliberation. A few norms are useful, related to legal commitments and requisites, for example, endorsing the limits of secrecy; while others are generally exhortative. The Code alludes to its norms as either "enforceable" or "sought to be followed" rules (Freud & Krug, 2002).

Though social work professionals are permitted to cease offering help to clients who renege upon agreed financial considerations, they are also required "to make an effort to abstain from forsaking clients who are still in need of services" (Freud & Krug, 2002). In different areas, the Code's solutions only urge evident measures of tolerability. Social work professionals work with illegal expatriates and don't impugn them. Social workers used to look the other way when an Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) mother supplemented her small advantages through low maintenance work (Freud & Krug, 2002).

Interpersonal and relational implications to client/practitioners working alliance

The therapeutic consideration includes moral decisions by it very act; the ethical qualities controlling this practice have been portrayed as those identified with consideration, empathy, and the regards for human poise, honor and dignity. It is a given that medical caretakers are mindful of their moral obligations to patients; all the same, it is also no known that the structure of the workplace can restrict attendants' capacity to assiduously follow those obligations. As long as therapy is concerned, supervisors and officials have the same moral concerns as hands-on, bedside attendants. Despite the broader structures set for moral obligations, there is proof to the fact that sometimes therapists do act on the fringes of moral consideration against therapy's sensitized values and have transgressed the limits imposed by the different imperatives to their moral decisions. Many choose to embark the field of social work to help other people develop and enhance their life circumstances. Yet, in dealing with clients, such professionals must keep up clear limits to guarantee proficient respectability and obligation (NASW, 1999).

Numerous experts go into the field of…

Sources Used in Documents:

Reference

Birkenmaier, J., Berg-Weger, M., & Dewees, M.P. (2014).The Practice of Generalist Social Work. Hoboken: Taylor and Francis.

Campbell, C. (2003). Anti-oppressive social work. Promoting equity and social justice. Halifax. Author.

Frankenberg, R. (1993). White women, race matters: The social construction of race.

Freud, S., & Krug, S. (2002). Beyond the code of ethics, part I: Complexities of ethical decision making in social work practice. Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Social Services, 83(5), 474-482.


Cite this Document:

"Responding To Clinical And Ethical Dilemmas" (2015, February 23) Retrieved April 19, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/responding-to-clinical-and-ethical-dilemmas-2148662

"Responding To Clinical And Ethical Dilemmas" 23 February 2015. Web.19 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/responding-to-clinical-and-ethical-dilemmas-2148662>

"Responding To Clinical And Ethical Dilemmas", 23 February 2015, Accessed.19 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/responding-to-clinical-and-ethical-dilemmas-2148662

Related Documents

Moral Distress According to a peer-reviewed article in Nursing Ethics, moral distress has become an increasingly serious concern in the nursing profession. The implication is that moral distress is associated with "ethical climate"; in other words, when a nurse knows full well the right thing to do in any particular healthcare situation but finds that "institutional constraints make it nearly impossible to pursue the right courts of action," that nurse is

One issue which has gained in public attention in recent years, first with the outbreak of SARS and avian flu, and more recently with the spread of swine flu, is that of public health epidemic. A failure to disclose health concerns properly or to allow others to know when one is seriously ill is a way to instigate the spread of a condition. Thus, "public health has laws governing

Ethical issues are now just as much of a concern as they were thirty years or more ago. (Qian, Gao, Yao & Rodriguez) Ethics are a clear set of principles dealing with what is considered appropriate behavior in-group and individual counseling. These standards were created not only to protect clients, but also to protect counselors. As a counselor, a fine line can easily be crossed if the counselor and/or the

Pharmaceutical Ethics Issues Generally, business ethics is a concept that has not been upheld or exemplified to any high standard by the modern pharmaceutical industry. It is an industry frequently plagued by unethical marketing decisions and practices, the pursuit of business strategies and policies that violate public trust in spirit if not necessarily in the written word, and that has embraced research practices that are sometimes highly questionable. In the modern

Ethics in Mental HealthCare (Anorexia) Eating disorders consist of a variety of symptoms with psychological, social, and physical characteristics. While the physical complications associated with these disorders may cause significant concern to the family members and the health care team, bulimia nervosa and anorexia nervosa are two of the common eating disorders having substantial long-term social and physical sequelae that make recovery difficult. The long-term disabilities associated with these eating disorders

Ethical Practice Involves Working Positively Diversity Difference Counseling is a profession that involves associations based on principles and values ethically. Patients are able to benefit by understanding themselves better and through creating relationships with others. Through counseling, the clients are able to make positive alteration in life and enhance their living standards. Communities, organizations, couples and families are different groups of individuals are main sources of relationships (BACP Ethical Framework, 2013,