Ethics and Morality: The Right to Live and Die The Ethics of Human Cloning

The topic of human cloning came into the limelight in 1996, when Dolly the lamb was cloned by embryologist Ian Wilmut of Roslin Institute, Scotland. The American Medical Association (AMA) defines cloning as the "production of genetically-identical organisms via somatic cell nuclear transfer" (Fornsworth, 2001). Essentially, it is the production of a baby with the same genes as its monozygotic parent, and which basically involves inserting the parent's DNA into a nucleated egg and then chemically stimulating the egg to undergo cell division and become an embryo that is a complete genetic copy of its parent / DNA donor (Fornsworth, 2001).

Despite its inherent benefits, which include helping sterile couples get an offspring complete with either the father's or the mother's genetic make-up, and creating humans who can readily be organ donors for each other; cloning has faced large-scale opposition from religious experts, the medical fraternity, and the public as a whole. At the heart of this opposition are two ethical questions -- does a child born as a genetic duplicate of another person have the...

As a matter of fact, the high safety risk at play has been the key reason why human cloning has been widely opposed by the public (Wordpress, 2009). The probability of a clone dying in the womb is 1000 times higher than that of them surviving; and even those that survive face high likelihoods of having birth defects that would eventually lead to death. Of even greater concern is that the mother/surrogate faces a high possibility of death, given that the Large Offspring Syndrome, which causes a clone to overgrow in the womb, is almost inevitable (Wordpress, 2009). Furthermore, clones face higher chances of early death, owing to the effect of orthopedic problems occasioned by the electric and chemical procedures involved in their creation (Wordpress, 2009).…