Rome Or Roman Veii Essay

PAGES
1
WORDS
343
Cite
Related Topics:

The invasion of the Gauls in 390 BCE is one of the events that shaped the history of Rome since it struck the Roman people hard. The invasion, which resulted in the capture and sack of Rome, had devastating impacts to an extent that some Romans thought of abandoning their city and relocating permanently to Veii, a recently conquered Etruscan city. Much of the Roman population supported the move on the premise that Rome was so destroyed to an extent it could not be rebuilt. While some Romans migrated to Veii in search of new beginnings, the conqueror of Veii, Marcus Furius Camillus, was against the move. Through his efforts that sought to protect the religious integrity of Rome, the Roman people did not abandon their city.

Camillus efforts played a critical role in safeguarding the religious integrity of the Roman people and ensuring they did not abandon their city. If the Romans abandoned their city as most of them had favored, the city of Rome could have been completely destroyed and captured by the Gauls. As shown in the scenario, the Roman people changed their minds against moving permanently to Veii at a time when Gauls were increasingly destroying and capturing the city of Rome. If the Roman people had abandoned their city at this time, it would have been completely destroyed and captured. This could have in turn limited the historical importance of Rome as the Roman people could have become slaves to the Gauls. Permanent migration to Veii could have displaced the Roman population at a critical period in its territorial expansion. In such a scenario, Rome’s history would not have essentially been the same as displacement of the population could have empowered Rome’s hostile neighbors and given them a cutting edge in the war. Rome could have lost the war against its hostile neighbors, which would have significantly reduced the Roman population and her historical importance. As a result, Camillus’ argument played a critical role in shaping the fate and historical importance of Rome.

 

Cite this Document:

"Rome Or Roman Veii" (2019, March 25) Retrieved April 22, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/rome-or-roman-veii-essay-2173580

"Rome Or Roman Veii" 25 March 2019. Web.22 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/rome-or-roman-veii-essay-2173580>

"Rome Or Roman Veii", 25 March 2019, Accessed.22 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/rome-or-roman-veii-essay-2173580

Related Documents

Etruscans If someone living 2,000 years from now wanted to know what took place in the year 2005, it would be necessary to go through impossible amounts of information. Today, scores of individuals with varying agendas write about day-to-day events. Thousands of publications and electronic media maintain records. Before the Common Era the situation was naturally much different. Because so few accounts exist of this time period, anthropologists and historians have

Economics in Ancient Civilization It is said that "Rome was not built in a day." Indeed, the Roman Empire was the last of a series of civilizations to emerge in the Mediterranean by the First Millennium, B.C. Precursors to the culture most identified as the seat of Western political economy, the Ancient Egyptians, Etruscans, Greeks, Syrians, Carthaginians and Phoenicians all had contact with the Romans, and eventually were incorporated through territorial