Sealed Bidding IFB Process Vs. Term Paper

PAGES
1
WORDS
383
Cite

Sealed Bidding (IFB) Process vs. Negotiated (RFP) Process

The negotiated process is the better alternative within this particular situation. The company possesses a competitive advantage that is not easily duplicated by competitors. For one, the company has an outstanding reputation and exceptional problem solving skills. Competitors entering the market don't have a reputation for success as this company does. As a result, the negotiated process allows for the company's advantages to be utilized effectively in a manner that can benefit both the company and its constituents. The goal of the negotiated process is to select the best available candidate within the overall pool of applicants. The potential candidate should demonstrate the ability to meet scheduled demand while providing a quality product that meets customer specifications. The most effectively method to determine this is through historic performance. Since this company retains a superior reputation within the market it has the best historic performance measurements. This provides a marginal benefit over competitors bidding for the same contract.

Within the construction industry, quality service far outweighs cheaper production. Customers don't want low quality providers who provide subpar service. Although cheaper, this service will ultimately lead to more expenses born on the part of the customer. The majority of these expenses come in the form of extra labor costs and redesigns to fix recurring problems due to low quality.

Instead, quality, and value is of the utmost importance within the construction industry. The negotiated process allows companies to reinforce their credentials to better obtain funding. In addition, the negotiated process is more of a collaborative effort on the part of all stakeholder involved. Both the contractor and the designer are assembled earlier resulting in more efficient operations. Since the company is well regarded within the construction industry and possesses prior experience, the process will also be more efficient. The sealed bid process, however, doesn't allow for such a convenience. In actuality, a sealed bid process will favor the company who may not be the best available candidate. Through the negotiated process the company can create a model that best serves the interests of the team in achieving the most successful project.

References

1) "Successfull RFP's in Construction - MGH-0071449094." NorthWest Builder's Network, Inc. - the Builders MarketPlace. Web. 05 May 2011. .

Cite this Document:

"Sealed Bidding IFB Process Vs " (2011, May 05) Retrieved April 20, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/sealed-bidding-ifb-process-vs-14239

"Sealed Bidding IFB Process Vs " 05 May 2011. Web.20 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/sealed-bidding-ifb-process-vs-14239>

"Sealed Bidding IFB Process Vs ", 05 May 2011, Accessed.20 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/sealed-bidding-ifb-process-vs-14239

Related Documents

Sealed Bids vs. Competitive Proposals As part of their job description, contracting officers have to make a wide range of decisions relating to procurement. One of these decisions is whether to use competitive proposals or sealed bids. In this text, I compare and contrast competitive proposals and sealed bidding. In so doing, I will amongst other things discuss the most advantageous method from a contractor's perspective. Sealed Bids vs. Competitive Proposals Before discussing

(Vancketta, 1999) The 'Changes' clause enables the Government "to make unilateral changes to the contract during performance, so long as those changes fall within the contract's scope." The Standard 'Changes' clause utilized in fixes price supply contracts allows the CO to make changes in writing to: 1) the drawings, designs, or specifications when the item is being specifically manufactured for the government; 2) the method of shipment or packing; or 3) the place

Federal Contract There are two basic methods for providing goods and services to the federal government. One is through existing and required sources of supply where the other is an open market acquisition using simplified acquisition techniques or formal contracting methods (14 FAH-2 H-200 Acquisition Basics, 2011). The simplified acquisition method falls into the threshold of $3,000 to $150,000 category and is done with procedures such as, imprest fund, purchase card,

Small Business Government Contracting CEO of Small Business that Provides Service Expansion by Competing for Navy Contracts at a Base Several Miles Away The objective of this study is to examine the scenario of a CEO of a small business that provides a service and business expansion through competing for Navy contracts at a base several miles away. This work will: (1) Determine how the federal government encourages small businesses and how

Moreover, the U.S. military has become increasingly aware of such strategies for improvement based on these "best" practices because of their potential to help the military achieve its strategic goals and their perceived ability to help formulate relevant strategies for improving military procurement procedures (Baldwin et al., 2002). U.S. Army Hospital Mission. Impact. Today, U.S. Army hospitals may be situated in the middle of the homeland or in close proximity to