Smedley, a. & Smedley, B. (2005). "Race as biology is fiction, racism as a social problem is real." American psychologist 60(1), pp. 16-26.
Despite what my be perceived in societal attitudes at large, a large debate still persists among certain researchers and theorists in the psychological world regarding the issue of race. As Smedley & Smedley (2005) note, some researchers still insist that there are measurable racial differences in aspects of personality such as intelligence that cannot be explained merely by social circumstances and upbringing, but in fact suggest or even require a genetic explanation. Most researchers do not find such conclusions accurate or scientifically meaningful, but their dismissal of the issues of race is, according to the authors, equally misleading and possibly destructive. As the authors themselves say about their intent in this article, "Our aim is not to review the psychological literature regarding the construction of race but to bring anthropological and historical perspectives to the study of race" (Smedley & Smedley 2005).
The authors begin the main substance of this article by defining culture in anthropological terms, which essentially includes all of the knowledge, attitudes, behaviors, and beliefs of a given people. This understanding of culture negates the idea of biogenetic causes of behavior, placing the culture itself as the source and causal agent for all of these things. This relates to the idea of ethnicity, as well, which should not be confused with a racial difference but instead reflects differences in culture that have grown to the point of ethnic identification. Ethnic conflicts are actually usually between peoples that would identify the same racially, such as the English and the Irish or Indians and Pakistanis. In fact, language and religion were more important factors than perceived race in establishing identity until the 17th century.
Even after the racial criteria of identity had been established, it was still clearly an entity quite apart from ethnicity, as the varying treatment of white American immigrants and minority groups in the United States demonstrates. Ethnic and cultural variations were expected to disappear by assimilation, but racial qualities were quite consciously permanent and impermeable. The nineteenth century saw race becoming a scientific subdivision of humanity, and in the mid-twentieth century genetic evidence for this division was claimed to exist. Subsequent research has shown that humans are 99.9% genetically the same, refuting such claims. The term "race" itself did not acquire the connotations of separation and identifications with geographic origins or the social division that it now implies until the Revolutionary era. Race, then, is an ideology rather than a biological fact, and it involves perceptions and concepts rather than empirical truth.
This fiction of race was implemented in the United States to prevent races from marrying, and even the concept of "mixed race" was abolished making race an all-or-none division, and it was not until the 200 census that respondents were able to mark two racial identities. In Central and South American countries where phenotypic missing from native and European ancestry made strict racial divisions difficult, the practice still developed in the form of racial gradients based on factors such as skin color, with those supposedly evidencing greater amounts of European ancestry becoming dominant over other identified groups. These ideas of "folk race" were being matched by the scientific notions of race. These developments arose out of social observations, but grew increasingly technical under the minds of many scientific thinkers. The advent of genetics in the twentieth century only propelled this further.
The lack of true empirical evidence supporting the genetic basis of race, combined with the various and evolving concept of race, suggests that race is not at all biological or genetic in origin. The social concept of race is still highly prevalent and influential in society, however, and it would be imprudent for policymakers and officials to ignore the concept now that it is so engrained in various other social outcomes and influences. Historical racism in the United States has left a "lasting residue" despite the overt and conscious abhorrence of racism in most of the country. Home mortgage lending still shows very clear racial biases in terms of availability and rates, and other measurable and practical instances of racism are also common occurrences even in the present day. Especially noticeable is the distinct difference in the level of healthcare services available to and received by various social races in this country, which also indicates and leads to other social and economic disparities between race classes.
You’re 86% through this paper. Sign up to read the full paper.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.