Sociological Analysis: Semper Fi: Always Faithful Article Review

Semper Fi: Always Faithful How is the community defined in this case? How does the culture of the community contribute to the development of the situation?

The military tends to be a highly insular culture that is resistant to criticism by outsiders. This is particularly true of elite units such as the Marines. Although the Marines view themselves as fighting for America's freedoms, they also see themselves as possessing unique attributes as a core that must be protected because others from the outside do not understand their work ethic. This is depicted as having a critical role in the cover-up of the water contamination over the course of the documentary. The focus is not on doing what is right but upon protecting the reputation of the Marines.

Q2. Name 3 strengths and 3 barriers of the culture of this community.

Of course, even though in the film it is portrayed as a serious weakness, there are certain strengths to this attitude of the Marines. Having the determination to protect their members and reputation creates a sense of brotherhood. Members of the community are literally willing to give up their lives for their unit and for the cause they are fighting for. As can be seen in the character...

...

Much as people speak about the blue wall of silence that characterizes police officers, there is a similar attitude amongst Marines when it comes to criticizing any actions of the organization, no matter how negative. Members are also very reluctant to verbalize any criticism of superior officers, no matter how justified it might be. This made investigating the water contamination outlined in the film particularly challenging. A refusal to speak is particularly characteristic in regards to matters of health, given the desire of many Marines to seem impervious to any type of physical pain. This could have contributed to the lack of reporting of the early incidences of the cancer affected the community: the Marines were unwilling to be more outspoken about their health conditions. A final problem is hostility to the media in particular which could have brought the contamination to light far sooner, had it affected another community. In the past, the media…

Sources Used in Documents:

Work Cited

Semper Fi: Always Faithful. Directed by Tony Hardmon and Rachel Libert, 2011.


Cite this Document:

"Sociological Analysis Semper Fi Always Faithful" (2015, April 14) Retrieved April 23, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/sociological-analysis-semper-fi-always-2150485

"Sociological Analysis Semper Fi Always Faithful" 14 April 2015. Web.23 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/sociological-analysis-semper-fi-always-2150485>

"Sociological Analysis Semper Fi Always Faithful", 14 April 2015, Accessed.23 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/sociological-analysis-semper-fi-always-2150485

Related Documents

Film: A Class Divided The documentary film A Class Divided has become a standard for exploring the origin of racial prejudice in a diverse society. Jane Elliott was a third-grade teacher in 1968 at the time of Reverend Martin Luther King's assassination. Elliott devised an exercise to conduct with her students to help them understand how racism and stereotyping emerge and are maintained in groups of people. Using eye color as

Documentary Movies
PAGES 7 WORDS 2479

Ken Burns' Documentary: The National Parks -- America's Best Idea The reputation Ken Burns has acquired over the years is a glowing, highly lauded reputation, and for good reason. His use of history, video and well-written narrative has won awards and has entertained and informed all those who have come into contact with his documentaries. The documentary to be critiqued and reviewed in this paper is The National Parks -- America's

The way that it uses John Alpert, a therapist who consulted a great deal of important Wall Street figures, with the purpose of showing how these people were basically no different from ordinary criminals (seeing prostitutes and using cocaine) when considering the way they spent money further contributes to increasing the terror of the thought that they were in charge of the world's finances. More precisely, it provided very

(Berardinelli) Overall, the movies received lots of appreciation and did great business on the box office. Film was also shown in Iran where American films are not supposed to be shown. Film also received positive response by the critics. Most of them also felt that the movie depicted one side of point-of-view but in spite of that, it was worth watching. Fahrenheit 9/11 became the highest grossing documentary of all

From this came our insistence on the drama of the doorstep" (cited by Hardy 14-15). Grierson also notes that the early documentary filmmakers were concerned about the way the world was going and wanted to use all the tools at hand to push the public towards greater civic participation. With the success of Drifters, Grierson was able to further his ideas, but rather than directing other films, he devoted his time

Richardis a documentary film made by Al Pacino in 1996 and is based on the historical play Richard III written by William Shakespeare. Richard III remained the King of England for just two years only (1483-1485). In Richard III, Shakespeare has sketched how Machiavellian tendency of Richard III enabled him to gain power despite his brother Clarence being prior to Richard III in line of succession. Since Richard III