Research Paper Doctorate 3,251 words

Strategic Plan for General Motors Upper Mid Sedan Vehicle Segment

Last reviewed: July 26, 2002 ~17 min read

Strategic Plan for General Motors Upper Mid Sedan Vehicle Segment

Mission Statement

To maintain and consolidate the status of the company as the number one auto manufacturer in the U.S. By employing the core values of continuous improvement, innovation and integrity and teamwork. To foster consumer enthusiasm and also enhance the team by giving them individual respect and responsibility.

External Environment

Remote Environment

Economic: Currently the U.S. economy is experiencing a slowdown. The buying power of the American consumers is shrinking and that is causing the sellers of goods to suffer. The automotive industry, being seller of high priced and high involvement product, is suffering as a result of this slowdown. The consumers are spending less and less on upgrading their cars or buying second hand cars. This will cause the sales of light vehicles in 2002 to go down from the 17 million units' barrier that has been achieved for the past three years (Levy, 2001). The increase in the unemployment rate has also seen lessening of interest in buying cars.

2. Technological: The minimalist approach that was predominant in the U.S. market during the oil crisis of the 1970's has gradually been phased out. Now the emphasis of the automakers is in providing sleek curves that would make their cars stand out. But looks are not everything in the mid sized sedan industry and many other factors are also being considered. Some automakers like Toyota emphasize on safety features while some manufacturers like Pontiac (GM) make performance their USP (unique selling point) (Adler, 1997).

B. Industry Environment:

1. Buyer Power: the buyer power in the car manufacturer's industry is very high as high volumes and high margins characterize the industry. Also the products that they make tend to be very much homogenized for a long while, with only minor variations introduced after introduction. This results in their achieving economies of scale and further decreasing their costs.

2. Competitive Rivalry: the rivalry in this industry is very high and each player has got a portfolio of cars that cater to specific markets. These markets invariably overlap and so one sees each different customer having to choose from a wide variety that is the sum total of the offering of each company. This means that the chance of substitution is very high. The sedan market also is very overpopulated as there are too many players vying for the same customer.

C. Opportunities

1. Technological Breakthroughs: The impact of technological breakthroughs tends to be huge on this particular industry. As a result this area presents a huge opportunity for all players. This may be a breakthrough in the product itself or the advancement can be in the production process that cuts down costs.

2. Changes in Government Regulations: The government regulations also present an area of opportunity for the carmakers and they should develop regulations in sync with the other countries so that the U.S. cars may be able to gain a firm foothold there as well. The GM cars are already above the government regulations so they have an edge here.

D. Threats

The U.S. auto industry has been facing threats from the foreign players since the 1970's oil crisis who offered a low priced more fuel efficient alternative (Phillips, 2000). Toyota is soon to eclipse Chrysler for the number three bestseller in the states. Other automakers like Honda, Nissan and Volkswagen are also rapidly gaining market share. Hyundai and BMW also seem to be increasing their market share. All this comes at a time when the big three are actually losing their shares (Brauer, 2002), so the threat is especially imminent.

Another threat has to do with the economic slowdown that has resulted in decrease in buyer power and shrinking the market size.

III. Operational Environment

A. Competition -- for the GM mid priced sedans, we see competitive threat in:

1. Dodge Intrepid: This car is marketed for its looks. However when it comes to quality of materials used and warmth, it falls short of the competition. (Lefkowitz, 2000). The Intrepid rely on its size and style as its main selling point. Overall the value and quality of the Intrepid is average. Only loyal consumers will insist and think that it is something of an exchange for the Toyota Camry. The standard power, good looks and room cannot be matched with those of Japanese cars. The only good features are that it is durable at an affordable rate. Noise and quality fall short in the Intrepid. Although most car lovers do not care for exterior but a family car require those features for it to compete with the other two midsize sedan competitors.

2. Ford Taurus: this car has improved but still does not compare to the Camry or Accord from the inside. Ford Taurus is a reliable family car. The car has good features, offers good value, handling and economy. With a solid track record for reliability an average American family relies on Taurus to for worthy driving. Although it is comparatively low in quality, finish and fit against the Toyota Camry, the bottom-line is Ford Taurus is only the comparable car against its Japanese counterpart. But it does offer good value for money and that is its main selling point (Lefkowitz, 2000).

3. Toyota Camry: Camry could be considered top of the line when compared to its American counterparts. The company maintains customer base despite resistance from the American consumer. The combination of innovation, technology and quality is hard to ignore. That is the reason why the Toyota Camry appeals to the masses from the young to the old. Also, its winning formula is its ability to sustain consistent standards. The car is reliable. Customers can expect the next in line will have the same attributes which is why customers are willing to buy Camry even when they are at the factory. Look wise the Camry is graceful, matching its interior quality.

B. Customer Profiles: the profile of the customers can be seen in many ways. The foreign brands like Toyota for example are more diversely sold across the globe as compared to the big 3. The customers of those also tend to be diverse. Their brands are positioned differently in different countries. If we look at GM, and in general the mid priced sedan section, it can be seen that the target consumer tends to be price conscious but still wants quality in what he/she purchases. The age bracket starts from the young families to even retirees (as is the case with the Camry) (Lefkowitz, 2001). These cars mostly enjoy high customer loyalty and repeat purchases are common. These purchases may be guided by emotion as usually these cars are bought by the new generations as well.

IV. Key Success Factors

A. Technology: GM has always tried to incorporate cutting edge technology in its cars and that has been the major factor in its success thus far. But lately the foreign cars have taken the top rung in this regard and the image of GM as a tech savvy company is deteriorating. But even then the technology that the company has employed has placed it at the top of the market.

B. Distribution System: their distribution has added immensely to its efficiency as the Electronic Dealership Systems and the Dealerships network continue to give it the edge. GM does not believe in global expansion. For a long time the company resisted globalization. That is the reason why it continued to see losses. Only recently that the company have ventured outside the domestic market to Europe and Asia with its alliance to the various companies of these regions. Not only had this expanded the scope of consumers but it also open up a new set of channel of distribution for its cars. Instead of exporting and transporting its cars at a higher price it can now introduce its upper sedan categories to the new market at a lower rate.

V. Company's Strengths and Weaknesses

A. Strengths: the GM mid priced sedans has got certain strengths that make the company stand out. They score high when it comes to adhering to the government regulations. Their financial reserves are huge and credit lines are also strong. The company is also shedding its staid image and actually taking some risks as compared to previous records. They have cut down on the brand management as they are actually focusing on improving their product rather than building the brand equity. (Welch, 2002). At GM, now the go-fast mentality has been employed rather than the play-it-safe mentality of before.

B. Weaknesses

GM has become a giant in its industry and the recent slowdown of demand of its products has resulted in it having too many plants on its hands with less to produce. These plants reduce the overall efficiency of their system and also hurt the bottom line as the intangible costs such as depreciation etc. take their toll. The product lines that the company has are also spreading themselves too thin by broadening their vehicle lines to an extent that they seem to be trying to please everybody while actually hurting themselves.

VI. Financial

A. Revenue: General Motors vehicle segment has been showing a continuous loss over the decades. Compared to Toyota and Honda, the U.S. sedan market share has decreased from 75% to 49.5%. In this segment, GM's sales fell from $2,535 million to 2272 million, which is a decrease of 11%. The U.S. sedan industry on the other hand has decreased by a mere 4%. The decrease in sales has decreased profitability also. Financial statements announced by the company for the year 2001 indicate revenue income of $401 a drop from $4,452 million. Rapid selling in the market due to financial instability decreased EPS from $6.80 to $1.78. Although GM holds a 26.9% market share in the sedan segment, it is two notches down from its previous year of 28.6% [GM's Official web site: www.gm.com, www.biz.yahoo.com].

B. Profitability

The company's low profitability is the result of slow economic growth in the country after the catastrophic event of September 11. Operational wise, the company is also experiencing the after effect of its previous marketing strategy. Debt to equity ratio indicates 8.56. This high ratio of debt is due to the loans it gave to consumers under the credit sale campaign.

Similarly, the economic downturn in the banking industry has decreased credit line. A company of such a low credit standing lose creditability. Although the sedan market indicates a steady rise in sales by Toyota and Honda of approximately 1% each, American motor companies are indicating losses. This could only signify that the American motoring companies are losing consumer confidence. More and more people are relying on Japanese made cars. The company is optimistic about changing its approach to marketing campaigns but like previous years, experts are skeptic the viability of yearly statements by GM.

Market Share -- Pie Chart

Source: Business Week Online

C. PE Ratio

D. Due to the highly volatile nature of its industry with beta at 1.17, price earning ratio is also high at 13.98. Any investment endeavor cannot depend on the price earning ration for back up because the share price dependent on speculators.

VII. Corporate Strategic Objectives

A. Increased Market Share: Currently the company has 26.9% of the sedan market share. Last year it has 28.65. It was expected that GM would increase its market share in the year to come but unless there is a solid plan, this objective cannot be achieved [Kiley, 2001]. Hence, the researcher proposes an increase of 2.5% increase annually for the next 5 years for GM.

B. Below cost leadership: As discussed above GM have the technology, the market base and loyal consumers. But over the decade it remains stagnant in terms of innovation and anticipating consumer needs. It needs to improve quality product with the current lines of Regal/Buick, Impala, Pontiac and Century/Buick. Toyota and Dodge, its main competitors are preferred by customers because of its line production lead time. GM too needs to increase its lead time so that it will be able to meet customer demands. Another objective is to revert to its old strategy of creaming off existing market share. It needs to better its product so that it would top the Camry and Intrepid designed for a niche market instead of the general family car.

C. Increase Revenues: The sharp fall in revenue in this segment have contributed to the overall fall in revenue of the company. Although each year the trucks division increases its sales with better designs and models, the sedan division is in neglected resulting in losses. It needs to boost up revenue at least 5% annually for the next 5 years. This is the only way it can improve its financial standing. It needs to take risks in developing new product line to increase awareness among consumers. The company's financial reserve should be used for this purpose.

D. Reduce debt: GM followed DaimlerChrysler model of earning consumer loyalty by giving credit to its consumers. That is the reason why most of its resources are tied up. What it needs to do is decrease the credit facilities for consumers or at least only facilitate to those consumers who have a good record of credit standing. Once the receivables are returned, the company can use that to reduce debt. Credit standing is important for the future marketing strategy and investment viability. GM needs to clear its debts so that external investors feel safe to invest in it.

The future of the company should achieve the following revenue pattern:

Revenue Chart

Source: GM financial Statements

VIII. Corporate Strategy

A. Diversification

Toyota, Dodge and Ford, each year introduce a newer version of the old model. What they are basically doing is regenerate old market. GM too must adopt this tactic. In the previous section, the researcher proposed the company to increase its market share. This could be done by either diversifying its mid size sedan models or it could introduce a whole new line in this category. Given the existence of Buick, Chevrolet and Pontiac, GM does not need a new line of product. Toyota and Ford rely on their current brand to create market share. GM too must rely on its older brand to create consumer loyalty. Through this it can then expand to a higher level of market share. This way, it can create growth for its brand.

If the company follows the trend in the industry by creating relationships with its customers then it would be able to anticipate future demands. It need to find out what kind of cars, models, designs, features, looks, quality and for what price consumers are willing to pay for an all-American car. Having established the foundation of customer service it can now redesign its existing models, improve its quality and improve lead time to serve the customers, hence increasing sales.

B. Growth

GM at the moment require growth rate then decline rate. In the last few years, the company has only seen decrease in sales and profitability. There were two factors responsible for this: increased in debt/equity ratio and the competitiveness of the market. The first step it needs to do is reduce debt to increase its equity. This is the only way it can improve its creditability among venture capitalists. Once achieved, it can venture into improvement strategy where it will require fund for introducing new line of products.

You’re 83% through this paper. Sign up to read the full paper.

Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log in
130,000+ paper examples AI writing assistant Citation generator Cancel anytime
Cite This Paper
PaperDue. (2002). Strategic Plan for General Motors Upper Mid Sedan Vehicle Segment. PaperDue. https://www.paperdue.com/essay/strategic-plan-for-general-motors-upper-134917

Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.