Supportive Documents; -Day Workshop Agenda Answer Question

¶ … supportive documents; -day workshop agenda answer question # 1. Also, provide answers listed questions. Also, include citations document references. 1. Discuss handle brainstorming aspect meeting. Discuss how you will handle the brainstorming aspect of the meeting. According to the listed schedule, the 'ground rules' of civil discourse will be posted for all to see at the beginning of the meeting (such as beginning on time, talking in turns, and being respectful). The ground rules of brainstorming should also be posted.

Of course, based upon their experiences in grade school, most people are familiar with brainstorming techniques. However, it is important to refresh their minds. Brainstorming rules include not censoring yourself or others, setting a time limit for the brainstorming (or a limit on how many ideas must be generated before stopping), and not censoring others (Baumgartner 2006). Before the meeting begins, it should be decided if the brainstorming should take place collectively as a group, individually or by using a combination of two techniques.

Participants can write down their ideas and then share them with the group. Or a facilitator can appear before the group and write down the suggestions group members make. Both techniques have their merits. On one hand, individualized brainstorming tends to foster less self-censorship On the other hand, people may feel intimidated having to come up with all of their ideas by themselves, and can 'springboard' off of the ideas of others. Additionally, group brainstorming creates greater cohesiveness amongst group members.

The best technique, to foster team-building while still allowing for more individualized input may be to have a short, individualized brainstorming session after introducing the rules, and then shift to a collective brainstorming session, where people share their ideas and generate new concepts. After the brainstorming period, then a certain set of standards are created, by which to judge the quality of people's ideas (Baumgartner 2006). This enables the ideas to be refined and the best contributions from the 'free for all' can be selected and developed. Q2.

Apply risk meta-language to three (3) of the possible identified risks of this project. Mitigation, acceptance, and exploitation (Hillson 2010). Risk strategy 1: Mitigation The business of BP is inherently risky. However, through the use of appropriate controls, risk can be mitigated. For example, to reduce the health risk to employees, employees can be provided with protective equipment, be briefed about the dangers of the substances they use, the company can conduct routine checks (such as air sampling) and a 'buddy system' can be used during high-risk procedures.

Risk strategy 2: Acceptance Accepting some of the blame for hazards that have occurred during BP operations is necessary, given that denial has the opposite effect, in terms of improving company relations with the consumer public and government regulators. Independent reviews such as the TELOS Report and the Baker Report boards have noted that BP has underfunded routine maintenance of routing assignments and other aspects of extraction. Environmental safety reforms are poorly-integrated into BP's managerial structure, and BP must take responsibility for this.

Risk strategy 3: Exploit Rather than attempt to deny its responsibility for the recent disaster in the Gulf, BP must instead exploit this opportunity to.