Supreme Court Teaching Education And Essay

Specifically, when a student was accuse y a teacher of having been smoking in the bathroom and the student denied it, her belongings were searched by the principal. This search revealed cigarettes and marijuana, but the search itself was challenged, and this challenge made it all the way to the Supreme Court. There, the justices decided that students had a reduced expectations of privacy at public schools, and that therefore the search had not violated the student's Fourth Amendment freedom from unreasonable searches. This has led to many search initiatives primarily geared towards eradicating drug, alcohol, and tobacco use in schools but has also been applied in searches for weapons and other potentially dangerous or harmful material on school grounds. The War on Drugs, at least in the schools, got another...

...

Earls (2002), which determined that it was fully legal for schools to test all participants in extracurricular activities for drug use. Though this was also seen as a violation of Fourth Amendment rights by some students and parents, as well as others less directly involved in the issue, the Supreme Court ruled that the school had a pressing interest in the matter and that, since participation in the activities was voluntary, this interest outweighed privacy concerns. In this way, school license to eradicate drug use was again enlarged.

Sources Used in Documents:

References

Justia. (2010). www.justia.com. Accessed 4 September 2010.

Oyez. (2010). www.oyez.org. Accessed 4 September 2010.


Cite this Document:

"Supreme Court Teaching Education And" (2010, September 05) Retrieved April 25, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/supreme-court-teaching-education-and-8660

"Supreme Court Teaching Education And" 05 September 2010. Web.25 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/supreme-court-teaching-education-and-8660>

"Supreme Court Teaching Education And", 05 September 2010, Accessed.25 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/supreme-court-teaching-education-and-8660

Related Documents

D. joined the Majority. Justices Blackmun, H.A. And Powell, L.F. wrote a special and regular concurrence respectively. In addition to voting with the majority, O'Connor S.D. joined Powel's concurrence. Writing Dissenting Opinion(s): Stevens, J.P. filed a dissenting opinion in which Marshall, T. And Brennan, W.J joined. Brennan also filed a separate dissenting opinion in which Marshall T. joined. Case 5 Citation: Santa Fe Independent School District v. Jane Doe (2000) Argued: March 29, 2000 Date

Education Addams, Jane. (1994). Child Labor Legislation -- A Requisite for Industrial Efficiency. In On Education (pp. 124-135). New Jersey: Transaction Publishers. Famous education reformer Jane Addams expresses her different views on a liberal and decentralized American education during the late 19th to early 20th centuries. In this particular essay, Addams criticizes the U.S. government for encouraging children at young ages to work for factories and manufacturing companies instead of studying in

Jim Crow and the Segregation of SchoolsThe Jim Crow era lasted from after the Civil War, i.e., roughly around the late 19th century, to the mid-20th century in the United States. It was characterized by a series of policies at the state and local laws enforcing racial segregation, particularly in the Southern states. One of the most significant and pernicious aspects of this era was the segregation of schools, a

Most of which are relating back to upholding or changing previous Court decisions and Civil Rights legislation, regarding the way it is upheld today in specific cases. One case in particular, Gomez-Perez v. Potter, is a case which deals with the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) and what employers can do to protect themselves against former employees suing them for breach of this code. The ADEA states that

Supreme Court Chief Justices Warren and Rehnquist Compare and contrast approaches to criminal procedures by U.S. Supreme Courts: The Warren vs. The Rehnquist Court A common philosophical debate within the legal community is when the approach advocated by so-called 'conservative' justices (often called strict constructionism) is pitted against more 'liberal' and freer interpretations of constitutional words and history. Throughout much of the 20th century, it was often said that the more liberal

These policies make offenses such as bringing weapons to school equal am immediate suspension or expulsion. However, in recent years they have been stretched to include such offenses as bringing toy guns to school or, in the case of older students, forgetting that a knife or rifle used for hunting was still in a vehicle or backpack. In these cases, where the individual components leading up to the incident