Systems Vs. Contingency Theory Of Term Paper

Contingency management might in fact afford managers more flexibility in the short-term. Perhaps the best approach to management in the electronics industry or any industry is one that is combined, that allows certain elements of various theories to be incorporated into practice (Selden & Sowa, 2004). Any theory can be measured by whether or not it achieves its ultimate goals, which include the overall success and profitability of an organization (Miner, 2003).

Contingency theory allows an organization to adopt a management theory practices that fits situation factors, and this is often touted as an effective method for improving organizational performance (Donaldson, 2001).

Conclusions/Recommendations

Effective management within the field of electronics requires that managers adopt an open minded and universal approach to management. Many different theories might be applied to this type of organization, however the most effective are a systems or contingency approach. Though at first glance systems theory and contingency theory of management seem very different, they are actually quite similar, because they force managers to look at a situation from many different perspectives. In a contingency situation the manager is afforded many different choices, and works to adopt a solution that fits all situational factors. So too does the manager look at all sides of an issue using a systems theory approach, where the manager must take into consideration the impact of his/her decision on multiple systems within the organization. Both theories can be used simultaneously to elicit effective performance in the electronics environment.

...

(1989). Organizational theories: Some criteria for evaluation. Academy of Management Review, 14(4): 496-515
Callaway, R.L. (1999). The realities of management: A view from the trenches. Westport,

Connecticut: Quorum Books.

Currie, W & Galliers, B. (1999). Rethinking management information systems: An interdisciplinary perspective. London: Oxford University Press.

Donaldson, L. (2001). The contingency theory of organizations. Thousand Oaks

California: Sage.

Farmer, R.N.; Richman, B.M. & Ryan, W.G. (1966). Incidents in applying management theory. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company.

Mailick, S & Stumpf, S.A. (1998). Learning theory in the practice of management development: Evolution and applications. Westport: Quorum Books.

McNamara, C. (1999). "Brief overview of contemporary theories in management."

Management Assistance Program for Nonprofits. Retrieved February 18, 2005:

http://www.managementhelp.org/mgmnt/cntmpory.htm

Miner, J.N. (2003, Sep). "the rated importance, scientific validity, and practical usefulness of organizational behavior theories: a quantitative review." Academy of Management Learning and Education, 2(3): 250-68

Selden, S.C. & Sowa, J.E. (2004). "Testing a multi-dimensional model of organizational performance: Prospects and problems." Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 14(3): 395

Thierauf, R. (1999). Knowledge management systems for business. Westport,

Connecticut: Quorum Books.

Management Theory

Sources Used in Documents:

References

Bacharach, SB. (1989). Organizational theories: Some criteria for evaluation. Academy of Management Review, 14(4): 496-515

Callaway, R.L. (1999). The realities of management: A view from the trenches. Westport,

Connecticut: Quorum Books.

Currie, W & Galliers, B. (1999). Rethinking management information systems: An interdisciplinary perspective. London: Oxford University Press.
http://www.managementhelp.org/mgmnt/cntmpory.htm


Cite this Document:

"Systems Vs Contingency Theory Of" (2005, February 18) Retrieved April 27, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/systems-vs-contingency-theory-of-62324

"Systems Vs Contingency Theory Of" 18 February 2005. Web.27 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/systems-vs-contingency-theory-of-62324>

"Systems Vs Contingency Theory Of", 18 February 2005, Accessed.27 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/systems-vs-contingency-theory-of-62324

Related Documents

This may be true at large as well as small enterprises, even though the composition and power of the different actors may vary and in theory create different contingent circumstances. Q2. SMEs that buy off-the-shelf accounting software...To what extent does contingency theory apply and can we really say that 'it all depends'? The "disutility for effort" principle can be seen in the selection of many SMEs of off-the-shelf accounting software: the

Contingency Approach to Change Contingency Approach Developmental transitions, task-focused transitions, charismatic transformations, turnarounds and Taylorist methods Contingency theory suggests that there is no singular, prescriptive way of enacting change. Rather, the specific circumstances must be taken into consideration. In general, contingency theory proposes that change is dependent upon the relationship between the leaders and followers, the structure of the task, and the position of the leader (Doyle & Smith 2001). For example,

The religious organization has other-worldly goals, but must adapt to the demands of this world in order to survive. There are generally two kinds of responses to this problem -- the church response and the sect response. The church response is to adapt at the expense of the goals and the sect response is value-rational-to maximize goal commitment at the expense of adaptation (Satow, 1975). EXAMPLE NATURAL -- Management NEED

One must "initiate corrective actions when deviations exceed some preset level" (Kurtyka 2005). Process improvement is essential. It is not enough to meet benchmarks; a leader must enable the entire organization to improve in a synergistic fashion. It is also not enough to 'strike it big' with one large project success: an organization must ensure that its 'system' is functional and that a single incident of success is not

Leadership Situations As CEO, it is important to be aware of all the variables impacting the firm and apply the right foundational theory of leadership so that these variables are considered with effectiveness. In this situation, strategic contingencies theory serves as the best foundational theory from which I would draw to lead this organization. Developed by Hickson (1971), strategic contingencies theory focuses on the job that has to be accomplished and

Leadership: Theory and PracticeIntroductionThis paper explores my leadership practice in education concerning the values I stated earlier. It is concerned with how my leadership vision fits in with my actions. Many leadership definitions exist, but most of them suggest that influence initiated by a group, or one person, over others, is to determine the activities and shape relationships and what happens in a group. Concepts of leadership are viewed as