Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
In other words, there was no physical evidence linking Casey Anthony to the crime. Therefore, when the jury decided to acquit Anthony, many people believed the acquittal was due to the CSI effect. Certainly, had there been any physical evidence linking Anthony to the crime, a conviction would have been almost a certainty given Anthony's bizarre behavior after her daughter's death.
However, it is important to realize that a conviction against Anthony would have been difficult to achieve even in the days before TV shows like CSI. There was no evidence linking her to the commission of a murder. The defense's theory was unusual, but it was not unreasonable. The reality is that everyone linked to the child's death behaved very bizarrely in the days following the child's disappearance. It would have been difficult for any prosecutor to establish this case beyond a reasonable doubt, which is what the United States demands for criminal convictions. There is no reason to believe that this jury demanded physical evidence. If the prosecution had been able to turn up a witness that saw Anthony committing the murder or disposing of the body, there is no reason to believe that the jury would have dismissed that evidence because it was not forensic evidence. The real problem in the Anthony case was not a lack of forensic evidence but simply a lack of evidence. Gut instinct may suggest that Anthony is guilty of the murder of her child, but gut instinct is not sufficient to overcome the very high burden established for a criminal justice system.
Looking at how the CSI effect has been blamed for Anthony's acquittal, which was...
Donald Shelton, the chief judge of Washtenaw County, Michigan did an empirical study to examine whether or not the CSI effect actually exists. After conducting a survey of people called for jury service, what he and his team discovered was that television-watching habits were not the greatest determinant of a jury's expectations. While they found that jurors did expect to see scientific evidence in murder cases, they also found that those expectations were not linked to TV viewing habits. Instead, jurors were more likely to be impacted by their own personal technology than their TV viewing habits. In fact, "Shelton's study showed that owning the latest BlackBerry has a much bigger impact on how jurors evaluate scientific evidence" (Rath, 2011). Jurors who had more sophisticated personal technology were more likely to have higher expectations about evidence.
References
Heinrick, J. (2006). Everyone's an expert: the CSI effect's negative impact on juries. Retrieved November 3, 2011 from Consortium for Science, Policy & Outcomes website: http://www.cspo.org/documents/csieffectheinrick.pdf
Hoffmeister, T. (2011, Jul. 6). Did 'CSI' effect sway Anthony jury? Retrieved November 3,
2011 from CNN website:
http://articles.cnn.com/2011-07-06/opinion/hoffmeister.anthony.jury_1_csi-effect-jurors-crime-scene-investigation?_s=PM:OPINION
This places a significant burden upon the labs and the forensic experts that prosecutors depend on to produce forensic evidence. The article explains that there is a serious problem associated with crime lab ethics, which has been heightened in recent years. The article asserts that many crime labs have been cited for sloppy procedures and producing erroneous evidence (Morrison and Roane, 2005). The fact that crime labs are not
Television and film script writers have gained from crime and courtroom proceedings for many years. The use of the courtroom as a drama channel has significantly changed in the recent years among media options. The use of the courtroom as the basic source of drama action among these media houses has increased and changed focus from sheer creative imagination to real life cases. Indeed, many courtroom dramas today are based
CSI Effect in Criminal Forensics It has long been suspected that the scenes, stories and situations people are exposed to through the medium of television can eventually distort their view of reality. Phenomena such as the desensitization to violence exhibited by children who watch hours of cartoon combat daily, or the shifting sense of body image experienced by women who only see slim, attractive models on screen serve to confirm
When viewed from that perspective, it becomes understandable that a jury could not eliminate the second story beyond a reasonable doubt, and, therefore, had to acquit Michael of the crime. Psychological treatment of suspect Given America's complex racial history, it is no surprise that race is oftentimes seen as a significant factor in rape. There is no doubt that black men have been unfairly targeted as rapists in America. This is
" This article puts forward the notion that when analyzing the "...relationships between minority groups and mainstream populations," the issue of whether the use of "formal control is applied fairly and consistently between these different groups" is a pivotal place to begin (Ruddell, et al., 2004). It is pivotal because "injustice" not only can have "a corrosive effect" on the perception of the fairness (or unfairness) of the criminal justice system;
Layne', in December 1994, the Office of the Information and Privacy Commissioner received a compliant that the Vancouver Police Department had taken a decision to block out the faces of those person who were being interviewed by the police in the program, "To Serve and to Protect." The complainant was KF Media Inc., of Vancouver B.C. KF Media Inc. who was the producer of the program, and it generally