Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
¶ … Labor-Capital Conflict of the 1920s
Labor-capital confrontations had been long brewing since the dawn of the industrial age and the start of urbanization. As the owners of the means of production amassed capital, wealth became concentrated into the hands of the few. Labor movements emerged both in Europe and in the United States, transforming the political, economic, and social landscapes of nations. The environment in which labor-capital confrontations developed must therefore be understood within a broader historical context. Market liberalization and globalization led to increased opportunities for labor exploitation, in stalwart industries such as steel and other heavy manufacturing. At the same time, exploitation of workers led to worker unrest, strikes, and protests.
As Glen Jeansonne notes, the post-World War period of the 1920s was characterized by overreach and excess: "Businessmen in the 1920s could boast of substantial accomplishments, but business grew overconfident, arrogant. In their zeal and greed the irresponsible elements in the business community claimed too much, sought too much."[footnoteRef:1] Thus, the environment in which labor-capital disputes arose was one in which Big Business was becoming too big and overassertive -- the worker was being manipulated and exploited and the push for confrontation...
Strikes "by coal, textile, and railroad workers" became a staple,[footnoteRef:2] kicked off by the 1919 Seattle General Strike and steel strike which impacted cities across the nation, and led to the collapse of union leadership and organization over the next decade. That and the fact that demand for jobs (as a result of the flood of immigrants and migrant workers looking for positions effectively reduced the leverage of the unions).[footnoteRef:3] [1: Glen Jeansonne, Transformation and Reaction: America, 1921-1945 (IL: Waveland Press, 2004), 64.] [2: Glen Jeansonne, Transformation and Reaction: America, 1921-1945 (IL: Waveland Press, 2004), 34.] [3: Laura Owen, "Worker Turnover in the 1920s: What Labor-Supply Arguments Don't Tell Us," The Journal of Economic History, vol. 55, no. 4 (1995): 822.]
The strong arm of government, rather than break the monopolists and businesses that exploited labor for higher profits, catered to the demands of Big Business and routinely break the backs of strikers, unleashing police and military on them in order to get production going again.
In this manner the businessmen prevailed and their success was reflected in the new high-rises and skyscrapers -- the architecture of the future -- that began to dominate the urban city skylines: "steal and glass, symbolizing the triumph of…
Bibliography
Jeansonne, Glen. Transformation and Reaction: America, 1921-1945. IL: Waveland
Press, 2004.
Owen, Laura. "Worker Turnover in the 1920s: What Labor-Supply Arguments Don't
Tell Us," The Journal of Economic History, vol. 55, no. 4 (1995): 822-841.
Labor-capital confrontations had been long brewing since the dawn of the industrial age and the start of urbanization. As the owners of the means of production amassed capital, wealth became concentrated into the hands of the few. Labor movements emerged both in Europe and in the United States, transforming the political, economic, and social landscapes of nations. The environment in which labor-capital confrontations developed must therefore be understood within a
Labor Relations What changes are needed for unions to maintain support from their membership, the community, and the employers? In order to maintain support from their membership, the community, and the employers, unions have decided to change the dynamics of organizing by changing the environment and conditions where organizing occurs. They have become conversant with the idea that when the employers decide to use the entire 'arsenal' at their disposal, it becomes
(Macdonagh-Dumler and Pebbles et al. 1-14) The Marquette Range, which consisted of huge deposits of high quality iron ore, was discovered in the year 1844, the operations were initiated in the year 1846. Other ranges that were opened by the year 1910, included the Menominee, Gogebic, Vermilion, Cuyuna, and, the Mesabi range in Minnesota, in the year 1892. (Macdonagh-Dumler and Pebbles et al. 1-14) In the year 1844 the first great
Foreign Policy of China (Beijing consensus) Structure of Chinese Foreign Policy The "Chinese Model" of Investment The "Beijing Consensus" as a Competing Framework Operational Views The U.S.-China (Beijing consensus) Trade Agreement and Beijing Consensus Trading with the Enemy Act Export Control Act. Mutual Defense Assistance Control Act Category B Category C The 1974 Trade Act. The Operational Consequences of Chinese Foreign Policy The World Views and China (Beijing consensus) Expatriates The Managerial Practices Self Sufficiency of China (Beijing consensus) China and western world: A comparison The China (Beijing
Earnings of Black Men After World War II First Question Both men in these peer-reviewed articles -- James P. Smith and James J. Heckman -- agree that the earnings of black males rose relative to the earnings of Caucasian men up until 1980. How does Smith see the key reason for this phenomenon? That is, why, in Smith's view, did "…income ratios first begin to converge in the 1960s?" First of all according
From this came our insistence on the drama of the doorstep" (cited by Hardy 14-15). Grierson also notes that the early documentary filmmakers were concerned about the way the world was going and wanted to use all the tools at hand to push the public towards greater civic participation. With the success of Drifters, Grierson was able to further his ideas, but rather than directing other films, he devoted his time