Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
¶ … Robert Frank is now recognized as one of the most important and influential American photographers of the twentieth century, but this recognition was hardly immediate. Frank's most important work, the compilation from 1958 entitled The Americans, could not find an American publisher initially and debuted in France. Published in America a year later, it was received with hostility: a review in Popular Photography would describe the photographs as "warped" and "wart-covered," declaring them "images of hate" (Dawidoff 2015). Other negative reviews described the book as "a slashing and bitter attack on some U.S. institutions," "a degradation of a nation," and "a sad poem for sick people" (Lane 2009). The immensely negative initial reception is even stranger when Frank in 2015 can be referred to in the New York Times as "the world's pre-eminent living photographer" (Dawidoff 2015). It is worth inquiring more closely what Frank's artistic achievement was in The Americans, and why it should have provoked such a strongly negative reaction initially.
Perhaps the simplest clue to the poor reception of The Americans in the late 1950s can be seen through Frank's own artistic genealogy. Frank was a protege of the legendary American photographer Walker Evans, and The Americans...
Evans' own work represented the accepted artistic standard of American photography: carefully framed, composed, focused images, such as those from Let Us Now Praise Famous Men, his best-known work, a travelogue recording rural poverty in the South during the Great Depression. The Americans follows the travelogue format of Evans' masterpiece, but the photographic style is wholly different. In some sense, Evans felt the need to humanize and elevate his impoverished subjects: the camera lent them a grandeur and a dignity that poverty might be thought to deny them, and there was a sort of leftist political purpose behind his carefully composed and clear photographs. Frank, by contrast, aims for immediacy and reality, often to the detriment of these "classical" elements of photographic composition. Frank's photography is the sort that can be called "gritty" or "raw" in a praiseworthy way -- but in the late 1950s, grit and rawness were not considered praiseworthy elements of a photograph. Instead they merely seemed amateurish.
We can see both the merit and the lasting influence of Frank's methods, however, in a photograph like "Elevator -- Miami…
References
Dawidoff, N. (2015, July 2). The man who saw America: Looking back with Robert Frank, the most influential photographer alive. The New York Times. Retrieved from: http://www.nytimes.com/2015/07/05/magazine/robert-franks-america.html
Lane, A. (2009, September 14). Road show: The journey of Robert Frank's 'The Americans'. The New Yorker. Retrieved from: http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2009/09/14/road-show
However, critics complain that although the creatures created are fascinating as will be discussed later, the merging of special effects with the film itself is far from seamless. "Alas much of the effects work is considerably underset by thick matte lines - uncharacteristically poor work from Brian Johnson" (Scheib). Those thick matte lines are very visible at times during the film, particularly during the flying sequences when Flagor flies
The men had returned from the war, Americans were buying homes and putting all their energies in to building a nest for the family filled with all sorts of creature comforts. The female form reflected these comforts: it was round and healthy. On the other hand, the 1960s and 1970s signaled the rampant winds of change; while some people attribute it primarily to the debut of Twiggy, the skinny
His dedication and intelligence allowed him to eventually become not simply passable in his English speaking skills, but a lawyer, a U.S. Congressman, one of the best journalists of his era (and, according to some biographers, of any era), and an incredibly eloquent (if somewhat bombastic) speaker and letter writer -- not to mention one of the wealthiest men in the world, especially in the field of newspaper publishing
Forgiveness on human health. In its simplest form, the purpose of the study is to evaluate human psychological stress that might constitute a risk factor for heart disease. Further, the study will also evaluate the impact of forgiveness on heart disease. However, such a simple dissertation clearly demands further definition. What, exactly, do we signify when we speak of heart disease? What is properly considered as forgiveness? What impact does
T.S. Eliot and Amy Lowell The poetic styles of T.S. Eliot and Amy Lowell are so dissimilar, that it comes as something of a shock to realize how much the two poets had in common. Each came from a prominent Boston family, and was related to a President of Harvard University -- Eliot was a distant relation to Harvard's President Eliot, and attended Harvard as an undergraduate: Amy Lowell's brother would
He encourages people to come aboard a train being engineered in "weirdo abandon" by musicians who "dramatized a sense of what it is to be American" (1987, p. 10). Christgau, another writer who sees the correlation between this music and the greater society in which it occurred, adds: "rock criticism embraced a dream or metaphor of perpetual revolution. . . . Worthwhile bands were supposed to change people's lives,