¶ … War in the Middle East: A Classification Issue A lot of people don't understand the wars in the Middle East or what they are all about (Collum). Since 9/11, the Middle East has been a prime focus of countries in the West, but today Russia is also involved and Putin is painted in Western media as an aggressor and an enemy even though he is actually leading the fight against ISIS in Syria. The reality is that the West and its allies are conducting a war against Assad in Syria rather than a war against the terrorist group ISIS. Thus, the classification of this war in the West as a war against Terror is incorrect. It should be classified as a war in support of Terror, as the West continues to send arms and munitions to aid the "rebels" (aka terrorists) who are fighting Assad, the Russians and the Iranians (Durden, 2015). This paper will show why the War in the Middle East should be defined as a proxy war in which the West and its allies (Saudi Arabia, Turkey, Israel) assist mercenaries (aka terrorists) in destabilizing the region (just like it did in Iraq) so that puppet dictators can be installed and the region more easily...
If we start well before 9/11, we find that the think-tank PNAC in America was publishing documents calling for regime change in Iraq and Syria so as to better facilitate the aims of greater Israel. At the same time, pipelines through the Middle East to Europe were in the works. What happened was that Assad in Syria refused to allow the Saudis to build a pipeline through his country. Instead, Assad wanted to work with the Iranians to build a pipeline. This would cause the Saudis and the Israelis to lose profits that would otherwise be generated from the flow of oil and gas through their respective countries. An Iran-Syria pipeline would bypass these countries completely and cut them out of the loop (Escobar).
Post War Iraq: A Paradox in the Making: Legitimacy vs. legality The regulations pertaining to the application of force in International Law has transformed greatly from the culmination of the Second World War, and again in the new circumstances confronting the world in the aftermath of the end of the Cold War. Novel establishments have been formed, old ones have withered away and an equally enormous quantity of intellectual writing has
Impact of the UAE-Israel Agreement on IranIntroductionWill the new relations between UAE and Israel keep Iran expansive strategy at bay? This is a question that requires some political realism to answer. The political reality of the Middle East is that the various Sunni and Shia states of the Arab world have overlapping interests as well as conflicts; the situation is fluid, never static. This paper will discuss the impact of
As this paper has already implied, U.S. policy concerning Syria is only the tip of an iceberg -- as Syrian leader Bashar al-Assad has intimated, and as the PNAC papers and President G.W. Bush himself have blatantly revealed. Yet, the Bush Administration continually relied on scare tactics, bogus intelligence, and empty nationalistic slogans to offer to the American public a justification for its opposition to Syria. Conflict Theory is also
interventionism from the perspective of realism vs. idealism. Realism is defined in relationship to states' national interests whereas idealism is defined in relation to the UN's Responsibility to Protect doctrine -- a doctrine heavily influenced by Western rhetoric over the past decade. By addressing the question of interventionism from this standpoint, by way of a case study of Libya and Syria, a picture of the realistic implications of "humanitarian
Immigration and the Muslim Population 9/11 changed the world -- especially in the U.S. in terms of Muslim-American relations and the way the word "terror" and "terrorist" is used to identify or refer to a group of people.[footnoteRef:1] The issue of Islamaphobia became more pronounced and anti-Muslim immigration policies began to be discussed as a matter of national security.[footnoteRef:2] As -- has shown, the media has been complicit in both demonizing
Arab-Israel Relations: The Work of Trump or Outcome of Larger Structural Changes in ME Politics?IntroductionPresident Trump oversaw the Abraham Accords, signed in 2020 at the White House between Israel, the UAE and Bahrain. With Morocco an Sudan quietly signing on to the Accords weeks later it appeared that a domino effect might take place with more and more of the Arab world reaching a normalization of relations agreement with Israel
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now