Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
¶ … Theatres of War," Daniel Mendelsohn points out how political Conservatives Donald Kagan and Victor David Hanson find in Greek history, especially Thucydides' History of the Peloponnesian War, an argument on behalf of "plain hawkishness, a distaste for compromise and negotiation when armed conflict is possible." These present-day views on Greece demand a certain degree of rewriting of Thucydides. Mendelsohn explains how Kagan recognizes the opportunities presented by the new world order for revisionism or rereading the Peloponnesian War to shed light on current events. At the beginning of his book, Peloponnesian War (2003), Kagan informs readers that he wants Thucydides' work to "meet the needs of readers in the 21st century" and will refrain from drawing parallels between the ancient event and any modern counterpart because "an uninterrupted account will better allow readers to draw their own conclusions."
Unfortunately, notes Mendelsohn, Kagan's report may be "uninterrupted," but it does not allow people to draw their own conclusions. Readers tend to come away from Kagan's interpretation...
Adds Mendelsohn: "Unsurprisingly, Kagan's view could be taken to support a very twenty-first-century project indeed: a unilateralist policy of preemptive war."
Kagan's perspective on events and personalities originally suggests a commendable interest to see the war with a fresh and unsentimental eye. However, it is not long before it is clearly recognized that Kagan represents the Ollie North take on the Peloponnesian War: "If we'd only gone in there with more triremes," he seems to be saying, "we would have won that sucker." Similarly, during the war in Afghanistan, Hanson uses Thucydides (although inaccurately) to support the battle cry.
Mendelsohn's essay and the idea of revising history raises certain questions. Is it possible to use the past to predict the future? Is it possible to have a correct idea of what has happened in the past? Both of these concerns deal with the idea of objectivity. Regardless of how objective anyone, even a historian, wishes to be, personal…
References Cited
Kagan, D. The Peloponnesian War. New York: Penguin, 2003.
Mendelsohn, D. "Theatres of War." New Yorker, January 12, 2004.
Thucydides. History of the Peloponnesian Wars. New York: Penguin, 1954.
Zinn, H. Politics of History. Urbana, IL: First Illinois Paperback, 1990.
Declaration of Independence It is obvious, if we look at things today, that Jefferson's revolutionary vision has been achieved in America. Even more so, it has been achieved to a degree that we assume has never been reached elsewhere. On the other hand, we must admit that any such questions can also be answered "yes, to a certain degree" and we must acknowledge that this is the case for America as
Declaration of Independence The Theory of Government presented in the Declaration The author of the Declaration of Independence, Thomas Jefferson was greatly influenced by the political thoughts of the 17th century English philosopher John Locke and other thinkers of the European Age of Enlightenment. The theory of government presented in the Declaration is largely based on the political philosophy of Natural Rights that maintains that each individual enters a society with certain
Declaration of independence it was determined that thirteen of the countries were Free states and independent of England. Initially even under the government of England there were hardly any serious problems for the thirteen colonies. Even though it was England that hired the government holders and other main officials, colonies had very limited representation (U.S. History.Org, 1995) However England went heavily into debt. This was mainly due to the war with the
In fact, many of the ideas are taken directly from John Locke's theories, specifically the statement of the right to "life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness." Specifically, the declaration that "it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume...the separate and equal station to which the laws of nature...entitle them..." is a statement of both republicanism and Natural
" When that Amendment was put in, the country was very young and it was wild, with Native Americans often hostile (with good reason), with wild animals posing a threat, and with various wars (the French & Indian War; the Civil War) taking place. People needed to feel like they were protected, and the new government didn't want to take their personal means of physical protection away from them. The
Independence and Constitution Declaration of Independence to the Constitution When the American colonies declared their independence from Great Britain the Declaration of Independence stated a number of specific violations of the colonist's rights that British King George III that committed against the colonies. These were stated as the reason behind the American's right to rebel and replace the British government with one of their own. Several years later, after the Americans had