Thomas Jefferson Politics Decisions And Actions Democratic-Republican Essay

Thomas Jefferson Politics Decisions and Actions

Democratic-Republican Party's Beliefs and Ideals

Federalist Party's Beliefs and Ideals

Initiated the first Barbary War -- Aligned most with the Federalists party because it was a display of national power.

They were terrified of a strong national government.

They were strong believers of a central government

Bought the Louisiana Purchase -- Aligned most with the Federalist party because they believed in expanding national power by expanding their territory and property.

They understood the Constitution as being an essential document to limit the powers of the federal government.

They believed that listening to the citizens would make for a weak government system.

Initiated the Lewis and Clark Expedition -- Aligned most with the Democratic-Republican party because it was in the best interest of the people who would be settling there. It also provided insight into the agricultural possibilities in that part of the nation.

They believed that the United States economy should have been based on agriculture.

They thought that the government's main purpose was to provide order.

Signed the Military Peace Establishment Act -- Aligned more with the Federalist party because it established a military presence in the United States, which is what their party believed in.

The party believed in the right to vote for all White men, even if they were not property owners.

They thought that the elite would be the best qualified to run the government.

Established West Point -- Aligned more with the Democratic-Republican who saw the military as a science and believed in educating...

...

These were the policies enforced that led to the acquiring of the lands in the West from the Native Americans.
They believed that individual states should have power over their own citizens.

They supported trade with Great Britain a.

Established a deal with Georgia to create a bigger agricultural economy there -- aligned most with the Democratic-Republicans who believed that the nation's economy should be based on agriculture.

They thought that creating debt for the nation was detrimental to their ideals.

They believed that trading with the French would encompass their downfall.

Enacted the Embargo Act of 1807 -- Aligned most with the Democratic-Republican party who did not believe in an established trading relationship with Great Britain.

They did not support trading with just one country, at the time Great Britain, because it would undermine their newly gained independence.

They believed in the creation of the nation's first national bank.

Signed the Act Prohibiting Importation of Slaves -- Aligned most with the Democratic-Republican party because they believed in civil rights and opposed any sort of international trade.

They supported more equally distributing wealth among the different social classes.

They believed that the national economy should be the…

Sources Used in Documents:

References:

Meacham, J. (2012). Thomas Jefferson: The art of power. New York, NY: Random House.

National Archives. (2013). The Center for Legislative Archives. Archives.gov. Retrieved April 16, 2013 from http://www.archives.gov/about/history/building-an- archives/jefferson-letter.html


Cite this Document:

"Thomas Jefferson Politics Decisions And Actions Democratic-Republican" (2013, April 17) Retrieved April 20, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/thomas-jefferson-politics-decisions-and-89760

"Thomas Jefferson Politics Decisions And Actions Democratic-Republican" 17 April 2013. Web.20 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/thomas-jefferson-politics-decisions-and-89760>

"Thomas Jefferson Politics Decisions And Actions Democratic-Republican", 17 April 2013, Accessed.20 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/thomas-jefferson-politics-decisions-and-89760

Related Documents

Democratic and Republican parties have been able to maintain their strength and their membership numbers since the Civil War for both structural and ideological reasons. The ideological reasons are the most obvious to an observer and to many members of the parties; indeed it is because of the ideological positions of the two parties that people align themselves by party. The ideologies of each party are complex; a better

Second Reconstructions One of the most dramatic consequences of the Civil War and Reconstruction was that the South was effectively driven from national power for roughly six decades. Southerners no longer claimed the presidency, wielded much power on the Supreme Court, or made their influence strongly felt in Congress But beginning in the 1930s, the South was able to flex more and more political muscle, and by the 1970s some

Over the years, the electoral process has changed a lot. As per the original rules, each state legislature selected its electors. The electors would then assemble at a given time and vote for two people. The person with the majority of votes became the president and the runner-up became the vice-president. This system was in practice until the 1800 election. (the Presidential Electoral Process) By 1800, American politics were dominated

Question 1: Interest groups attempt to influence politicians and public policy in a variety of ways. Define the term interest group, distinguishing it from a political party, and briefly describe some of the ways interest groups seek influence.The overhaul of the US healthcare system brought about by the 2010 Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA), or Obamacare, attracted the attention of interest group representatives from the insurance industry, hospitals,

Catholic church and public policy have remarked that the members of American clergy in general, without even excepting those who do not admit religious liberty, are all in favour of civil freedom; but they do not support any particular political system. They keep aloof from parties, and from public affairs. In the United States religion exercises but little influence upon laws, and upon the details of public opinion; but it

Tushnet (2005) defends his point-of-view by writing that the advocates of the Stuart lawsuit placed the argument that Justices of the Supreme Court, even though, had the authority to be Supreme Court Justices, but they could not be Circuit Court Judges if the position of Circuit Court Judges already taken up by others had been eradicated. Furthermore, they stated that the eradication of the Circuit Judges had been, in fact,