Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
¶ … Tort Reform Necessary? Why?
There is no doubt that America is a litigious society. It is a right built into the U.S. Constitutional that citizens can bring litigation against a person or entity when real (or imagined) harm has been done. Justice should be within reach of all Americans in that sense. But is there a point where too many lawsuits are launched over issues that are seemingly petty? And are there institutions that need protection from litigation? These issues will be addressed in this paper.
Tort Reform is necessary: Dr. Jeffrey R. Cornwall writes in The Christian Science Monitor that small businesses are "…the most impacted by liability costs," and in fact he believes the current economic recovery in the United States cannot reach fruition without tort reform at some level (Cornwall, 2010, p. 1). Cornwall cites a recent study by the U.S. Chamber Institute for Legal Reform (ILR), a study which points out how small businesses...
1). The dollar amounts that the ILR presents are startling: small businesses paid out $105.4 billion in 2008 alone, and that figure keeps climbing upward, putting a huge strain on small businesses (Cornwall, p. 2).
Granted, Cornwall continues, the insurance companies ended up paying a lion's share of those costs, but another study Cornwall references shows that "…a third of the cost ends up coming out of their own pockets" and moreover, small businesses "…bore 81% of business tort liability costs but took in only 22% of the revenue" (p. 2).
Meanwhile, an example of why tort reform is needed is presented in a blog from the respected Washington, D.C. publication, The Hill. The blog is by Armstrong Williams, a conservative columnist, who takes issue with the actions by (then) U.S. Congressman Dennis Kucinich after Kucinich bit into a sandwich in the congressional cafeteria and broke a tooth when he hit a pit in an olive. Williams points out that Kucinich could have worked out a deal with the cafeteria to pay for his dental work, but instead Kucinich sued for damages ($150,000 worth) by claiming he suffered "serious and permanent injuries" and as a result of the broken tooth he claimed…
Works Cited
Cornwall, Jeffrey R. (2010). Why tort reform is necessary for economic recovery. The Christian
Science Monitor. Retrieved November 12, 2012, from http://www.csmonitor.com.
Roser, Mary Ann. (2012). New Study: Tort reform has not reduced health care costs in Texas.
American-Statesman. Retrieved November 12, 2012, from http://statesman.com.
Williams, Armstrong. (2011). Why we need tort reform in the U.S. The Hill. Retrieved November 12, 2012, from http://thehill.com.
Some legislators believe that such suits encourage companies to ensure that there products are safe. Other law makers, however, believe that such suits are excessive and can prevent companies from being able to recover. Another form of tort reform that as been suggested is known as "loser pays. This type of legislation is based on the English Rule (Protecting Firestone and Ford Federal Tort Reform). This particular proposal would force
However, this aspect of tort law does not apply equally to all areas of tort law. For example, under theories of intentional infliction of emotional distress, a tortfeasor's behavior has to shock the conscience of the court. That a particular victim is particularly sensitive does not increase a tortfeasor's liability. Finally, tort law does not always involve one wrongdoer and one victim. In fact, both parties can have some liability
tort law, including the pros and cons of tort law and the importance of tort law in business environments. In addition the paper will investigate the potential effects of tort reform, and review cases related to tort law, and how it may affect American businesses and consumers. Tort law is an important issue to explore because it relates to the issues of product liability, negligence and financial gain or
U.S. Health Care Reforms Objectives of reform of the health care system should align to improve quality, access and cost in health care. The intricacy of the health care system necessitates balancing the three variables while considering the individual's viewpoint. To achieve this equilibrium, health care programs ought to satisfy safety, actuarial and economic principles that should be under proper application and management for successful reforms. Evidently, there exist various problems
Fault: An Alternative to the Current Tort-Based System in England and Wales The United Kingdom statistics regarding claims THE NATIONAL HEALTH SYSTEM OBSTACLES TO DUE PROCESS THE CASE FOR REFORM THE REGULATORY ENVIRONMENT THE RISING COST OF LITIGATION LORD WOOLF'S REFORMS MORE COST CONTROLS THE UNITED STATES PAUL'S PULLOUT THE INSURANCE INDUSTRY TORT REFORM IN AMERICA FLEEING PHYSICIANS STATISTICS FOR ERROR, INJURY AND DEATH THE CALL FOR REFORM IN 2003: A FAMILIAR REFRAIN THE UNITED STATES SITUATION, IN SUMMARY NEW ZEALAND CASE STUDIES THE SWEDISH SCHEME COMPARISON: WHICH SYSTEM IS
This provision is based on the rationale that general damages do not represent financial loss to the injured person. A number of changes have also been made to the law in respect to assessment of damages for past and future economic loss. 4. The maximum amount of damages for economic loss due to loss of earnings or the deprivation or impairment of earning capacity is fixed at a rate of