It was not a deadly disease, but stricken men could not fight. Trench fever affected thousands of soldiers, and so did trench foot.
Trench foot is one of the most common ailments of soldiers in the trenches. Their boots and socks were always wet and muddy, and this led to the condition called trench foot. The feet would become numb and turn red or blue, and in extreme cases, it could lead to gangrene and amputation of the foot. The feet would also swell, fester, and develop sores. Soldiers had to change their socks at least three times a day to control the disease, and after the armies understood how severe is was, soldiers in the trenches received extra socks as part of their gear (Simkin).
Rats in the trenches were also a huge problem. They were attracted by bits of food and bodies buried in the trenches, and they multiplied rapidly so they could take over a trench system in a matter of weeks. They grew increasingly large, and they would attack wounded men and feed on dead bodies. They carried disease, too, and they were a constant source of stress and fear in the trenches.
As can be imagined, feeding soldiers in the trenches was an ordeal. The food was often wet and inedible, and the German blockade of Great Britain created food shortages on the front lines. At one point, fighting men were only receiving about six ounces of meat a day, and in some areas, they only had meat on nine days during the month. Historian Simkin notes, "By the winter of 1916 flour was in such short supply that bread was being made with dried ground turnips. The main food was now a pea-soup with a few lumps of horsemeat. Kitchen staff became more and more dependent on local vegetables and also had to use weeds such as nettles in soups and stews" (Simkin). In addition, cooks only had two large kettles to cook all the meals and everything else, and sanitation was not the best, so food often tasted the same, or like something that had previously cooked in the kettles. Bread and biscuits were always stale by the time the reached the men, and the food was cooked far behind the battle lines, so it was always cold by the time the men got it (Simkin). Overall, food in the trenches was awful, and soldiers constantly complained about the quantity and quality of the food they received.
While the Americans did not openly consumer alcohol in the trenches, the British, German, and French armies did allot some amounts of alcohol to their soldiers. The British had rum, while the Germans and French enjoyed wine and brandy. A soldier remembers "In winter there was a ration of rum, one or two tablespoons per man; this was a strong, black spirit which was usually issued during the morning 'stand-to'; it was very welcome on a cold winter's morning" (Simkin). Most often, small amounts were allotted to the men in cold weather or after an offensive was completed (Simkin).
Many men wrote of their memories of the trenches. One historian quotes, "Primeval forms' are in among you, and No. 2 Post is reduced to a shambles, scuppered by the German raiding party, armed with Bowie knives, lead-weighted coshes, and Walther pistols. In a matter of minutes it is over. The raiding party is already melting into the darkness of no man's land" (Bell). Author C.S. Lewis remembers, "Through the winter, weariness and water were our chief enemies... One walked in the trenches in thigh gumboots with water above the knee, and one remembers the icy stream welling up inside the boot when you punctured it on concealed barbed wire" (Simkin). Life in the trenches was terrible - so terrible that at least some soldiers shot themselves so they would be taken off the battle lines. These self-inflicted wounds (SIW) were punishable by court-martial and death, but no SIW soldiers were ever executed, they did however, serve time in prison (Simkin).
Of course, fighting in the trenches was extremely dangerous work. Simkin continues, "Being in front-line trenches was also extremely dangerous. Almost every day some enemy artillery shells would fall on the trenches. One study suggested that one-third of all casualties on the Western Front were killed or wounded while in the trenches" (Simkin). The diseases and conditions were bad, and the enemy shelling only made it worse. Another author notes, "[I]n trench warfare a small number of skills were used over and over, almost always with plenty of time...
Trench Warfare in World War I (WWI) Trench warfare was used in World War I and they were forced to live in muddy, isolated conditions for months exposed to horrific elements, and inviting diseases like gangrene. During World War I many things changed, as lives were destroyed, dreams shattered, and many soldiers died or suffering immeasurable psychological and physical conditions. WWI was the first time in history that war involved the use
The terrifying fear of living with the constant threat of instant annihilation from artillery shells and the soul-shaking noise and thunderous impacts of nearby strikes sent many veterans of trench warfare home with what was then called "shell shock" and which was so severe that some veterans suffered severe lifelong symptoms of what we refer to today as post traumatic stress disorder. Remarque also explores the theme of the
The larger the region covered by the chemical agent, the more likely it will be to cause the widespread destruction for which the person or group is looking (Brophy & Fisher, 1959). Toxicity matters, of course, but the earliest uses were not about the level of toxicity the chemical agent possessed. They were more focused on how the toxic was absorbed. If the chemical agent could be absorbed through
Tank Warfare in World War II Tank warfare was a catalyst for success starting in World War II. The war catapulted the importance of the tank and its abilities. World War II saw tanks as the primary means for overtaking enemy forces (Piekalkiewicz). They were essential in fending off invaders, maintaining strongholds, and even going on the offensive (Piekalkiewics). Tanks were somewhat of a new dimension, but they quickly perpetuated to
These young men were not immersed in the high modernist traditions of Virginia Woolf and T.S. Eliot: rather, they were immersed in the experience of war and their own visceral response to the horrors they witnessed. Thus a multifaceted, rather than strictly comparative approach might be the most illuminating way to study this period of history and literature. Cross-cultural, comparative literary analysis is always imperfect, particularly given the linguistic challenges
The author makes his most poignant statement when he concludes, "…Nothing has such a depressing influence on the soldier, as the sound of the enemy's cannon afresh as the moment when, after a forced march he seeks some rest…" and falls into the "…law of the enemy" (158). Author John Nagl points out that the strategies promoted by Antoine-Henri Jomini -- another well-known and respected military theorist -- and Clausewitz
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now