In this Chapter, K. suffers two types of defeat; first the defeat of his aborted sexual conquest that would ultimately be a victory over the Magistrate, and secondly the defeat of the air making him unable to go the Court offices. He is physically unable to be in the vicinity of the Court, and therefore unable to attempt to resolve his legal problems.
Chapter 4 is another abortive attempt to reestablish his ties with a lady. Fraulein Burstner lets K. know via Fraulein Montag that she does not wish to see him, and subsequently leaves, to make only one more appearance in the novel. When K. enters her empty apartment to look for her, he feels that he is doing something not only wrong, but also pointless. This pointlessness emphasizes the lack of meaning mentioned above.
Chapter 5 returns to the theme of surreal horror that K. began to experience in the beginning of the novel. It is also here that K. begins to realize the gravity of his situation. When leaving work, a noise from a lumber room attracts his attention. The scene that greets him upon investigation is grotesque and horrific. The two warders responsible for his initial arrest are being whipped mercilessly. This is a punishment for their conduct, about which K. complained during his first day in Court. K. is racked not only by horror, but also by an extreme guilt for the men's misery. This marks the culmination of the mental breakdown for which the Court is eventually responsible:
Furthermore, the scene focuses on K.'s increasing sense of powerlessness, as indicated when he listens at the door to the lumber room: "He was no longer in any position to help anyone..." (Kafka 30). He is unable to help the men either by bribery or self-sacrifice. Before he can offer help, K. is driven away by the screams and calls of the men. The horror associated with this is symbolic of the gradual torture that the Court is perpetrating against K., although in a much more subtle way than the Whipper. K.'s indicates the breakdown that is beginning in earnest.
Chapter 6 further emphasizes K.'s mental breakdown by focusing on the protagonist's sense of reality. According to his actions in this chapter, he is still not quite aware of how serious his situation is. In addition, this chapter also contains his third meaningless tryst with a woman, Leni. This occurs during a visit to the Court Clerk, arranged by his uncle in an attempt to help K.K. however is seduced by Leni's charms to the point where he no longer considers the meeting important, and leaves with the girl. His uncle rebukes him, "We wanted to discuss how best to help you, I had to handle the lawyer very carefully, he had to handle the office director carefully, and you had most reason of all to at least give me some support." (Kafka 32).
K.'s actions appear to indicate that he does not really care at this point.
His flippant attitude however may also be indicative of K.'s progressive mental breakdown. The whipping scene from the previous chapter may have damaged him psychologically to such an extent that he was merely searching for an escape from the oppressive reality from the Court and its Clerks.
Indeed, Chapter 7 appears to confirm this. K.'s work and mental well-being is beginning to suffer as a result of his legal problems. He is exhausted from the strain, worry and frustration of the case. The emptiness of his sexual relations is indicated by the fact that he does not seek solace in the arms of a women in this case, but rather consults with a painter who has some experience of the Court. The painter brings home to K. The exact nature of his relationship with the Court. It is a no-win situation for K., but at least he can postpone his case indefinitely.
As the painter continues to make K. aware of this oppressive reality, K. again begins to be physically affected by the air quality around him. It becomes increasingly stuffy and K. is increasingly anxious to emerge into the fresh air. It appears that the oppressiveness of the air progresses together with the increasing oppression of the Court and K.'s deteriorating mental state: "... It was actually not the heat that made him uncomfortable but, much more, the stuffiness, the air that almost made it more difficult to breathe, the room had probably not been ventilated for a long time." (Kafka 42)
Law and Society The Nature of Law and Justice - Sadomasochism Sadomasochism presents the complexities and nuances involved in the nature of law and justice. In its purest definition, socially and legally, sadomasochism is a consensual act. There may even be actual contracts involved. However, this presentation shows that just because there is consent to the act, doesn't mean that the dominant can get away with anything. In cases in which the
Oliver Wendell Holmes states that justice is subjective and changes according to the viewer's prejudice, viewpoint or social affiliation. But a set of rules is needed to make society function and these rules must be carried out. This philosophy of law applies to Ann Hopkins' case. The senior partner and admissions committee had the prerogative of setting out the rules with which partners should be selected. Their sense of justice
I just like accumulating knowledge and my professional career has shown that you never can really know where you will be needing parts of that knowledge: I worked as a machinist for some time, but then I was able to promote because of the additional knowledge I had gained in the meantime. I hope that the education I will receive in law school would help improve my knowledge portfolio to
Law and Philosophy Holmes' "bad man" theory offers insight into the difference between the law and morality. The bad man is not concerned with morality but he is as concerned about the law as any "good" man because in knowing the law, he can avoid getting into trouble. The bad man would lie, cheat, and/or steal if it weren't against the law because he cares not for the morals that underlie
However, Erin Brockovich the movie has a very different ending than the actual civil action under tort law brought against California's Pacific Gas and Electric Co. The Hollywood ending would have been preferable, however life is just not that simple and a tort law case against such a company is really a long, tiring legal battle. The 1993 legal dispute from Hinkley was resolved by arbitrage and at first
The fact that a guard was able to take information from a prisoner's cell, and give it to prosecutors is a clear violation of basic procedures. As a result, greater amounts of oversight are required to prevent these issues from becoming a problem in the future. ("Deon Christopher Carter v State of Maryland," 2003) Conclusion Clearly, the evidence that was collected from Jones' cell is a violation of the Sixth Amendment.
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now