Unequal Childhoods Annette Lareau / Book Report

PAGES
4
WORDS
1224
Cite

What is interesting about this way of parenting is that the parents are the ones who have to go out of their way to make sure that Alexander gets to all of his appointments, rehearsals and games on time. The parents are able to do this precisely because they are in an upper-middle-class economic level. Parents such as the ones in the McAllister family would not be able to take off from work early to bring their children to piano, choir and other lessons. This, undoubtedly, gives children like Alexander an advantage when it comes to how he will be prepared for the world. Lareau (2003) states that the Williams' parenting technique "embraces the logic of concerted cultivation. They consider Alexander's many commitments an essential component in his overall development." There are many consistencies between Lareau's theories and what she witnessed inside the homes of the families she visited. First of all, the language example, that in middle-class homes children tend to whine, negotiate, and bargain more with their parents while in lower-class homes children do not normally talk back to adults, seems to be quite true. Lareau (2003) notes that in middle-class homes there is a lot of talking that is interrupted by some silence while in lower-class homes there is a lot of silence interrupted by some speech. In Harold McAllister's home, this is exemplified.

In the McAllister home, there is also a lack of space, which means that Harold doesn't have any really clear private space (nobody does). Alexander, on the other hand, has a very clear private space that is designated just for him. Harold does not ask for things like Alexander does either as there is a constant lack of money. While both mothers of Alexander and Harold want the best for their children, there is a definite difference in how Harold's mother views...

...

She clearly sees her most important job as making sure that Harold is physically taken care of. Lareau (2003) notes that this is more common in lower-class families. Harold's mother does not focus on language and increasing Harold's vocabulary as Alexander's mother does. While there is communication between Harold and his mother, there is not the constant need to talk through everything or elaborate on things. When Harold complains about a teacher, his mother simply listens to him. Mrs. Williams would certainly have asked Alexander to tell her exactly why he feels the way he does and what can be done about it.
The difference between the Williams and the McAllisters is all about parenting styles and techniques. There are definitely advantages of growing up in a middle-class family, some of which are finding ones talents by trying a lot of different things and being given the chance to do things that enrich one's life. Harold doesn't have the same opportunities as Alexander, obviously. He doesn't go to piano lessons, choir practice, or summer camp. But the differences in parenting are not just about what the Williams can give Harold as opposed to what the McAllisters can give Harold. The parents obviously view child-rearing differently. Alexander's parents are more interested in making sure that Alexander is able to speak his mind clearly and effectively. This is very important to them as they really emphasize language skills in their household. Harold's mother, on the other hand, has other things to worry about in her home. She trusts, as is exemplified by her natural growth parenting style, that if she keeps Harold physically well, the rest will be taken care of in school.

Reference:

Lareau, Annette. (2003). Unequal Childhoods: Class, Race, and Family Life.…

Sources Used in Documents:

Reference:

Lareau, Annette. (2003). Unequal Childhoods: Class, Race, and Family Life. University of California Press; 1st edition.


Cite this Document:

"Unequal Childhoods Annette Lareau " (2010, December 20) Retrieved April 26, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/unequal-childhoods-annette-lareau-5672

"Unequal Childhoods Annette Lareau " 20 December 2010. Web.26 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/unequal-childhoods-annette-lareau-5672>

"Unequal Childhoods Annette Lareau ", 20 December 2010, Accessed.26 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/unequal-childhoods-annette-lareau-5672

Related Documents

236). Unequal Childhoods is a very enjoyable and interesting book to read. Despite the complexity of the issues she discusses, the author's language and style is accessible. The families and their activities are described in a straightforward, sympathetic way. Each chapter gives a new view of the thesis and explores the real lives of each of the twelve families. The reader gets to know them and to understand their attitudes

it's aspect of social capital: survival. Chapter 8: Children of middle class parents (like the Marshall family) can freely express themselves without worry of being punished; children of low income families usually are told what to do and only say what won't get them into trouble. Skills are passed along to children through parents' "overseeing, criticizing, and intervening in [children's] institutional lives. Chapter 9: Not much social capital is achieved in

Unequal Childhoods Critical Analysis Lareau's Unequal Childhoods: Class, Race, and Family Life reveals some of the root causes of social injustice and inequity in American society. The author's analysis is astute and relevant to current social trends. Taking a structuralist perspective allows Lareau to explore the patterns and normative behaviors within different income categories, to show how those patterns influence inter-generational disparities and perpetuate problems like economic disparity. The gap between rich

They gain a sense of distance, distrust, and constraint in their institutional experiences, a distrust that is common to White working class Italian households, and Black working class housing projects alike. Middle class children learn to regard leisure time as a time of skill building, to deal with strangers, even strange adults, to look these adults in the eye, and to comport themselves like members of the privileged class.

The different "isms" such as sexism, heterosexism, and racism are creating very real schisms -- in our minds, and between people. The chasms of communication that are created by hatred and misunderstanding are socially constructed. They can be socially deconstructed too. Such rifts occur between groups of people and between whole cultures. In some pockets of the United States, social conservatism threatens to erase the social progress made since the

For example, in discussing his childhood in "Southie" a poor neighborhood in Boston, Patrick MacDonald talks about the willful ignorance of the people in the neighborhood when he was a child. "They were all here now, all of my neighbors and friends who had died young from violence, drugs, and from the other deadly things we'd been taught didn't happen in Southie" (MacDonald, 1999, p.2). In other words, the