Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
The satisfaction derived from that is by reason of good will towards the common man and not some universal pleasure felt by all men.
But what about pain? Is Mills seems to be stating that happiness is the absence of pain. But is not some pain beneficial? Our reaction to spoiled milk that prevents us from drinking it for example. Wait, perhaps there are levels of pain that need to be analyzed as well. Good pain vs. Bad pain, there is certainly some credence there. Is there good pleasure and bad pleasure? According to Mills that should be true, yet he does not seem to define it so. Pain is also part of experience so in the experience of pain are the beginnings of the knowledge of pleasure, and perhaps the distinction between higher and lower pleasures that Mills is putting forth.
Yet does that not make pain also a component of the happiness equation? In essence Mills is more properly stating that the equation of happiness is some level of existence between pleasure and pain. This is especially true when one considers that his view of the more learned man is one of more discontentment than...
To do as you would be done by, and to love your neighbour as yourself, constitute the ideal perfection of utilitarian morality. (Mills)
Alas, as with many philosophies and philosopher, Mills is dealing with ideal states and superlatives and giving little credence to observable facts and reality. To be practical or useful a philosophy must address a wider range of variables and not merely force a single interpretation on a very complex structure, such as pleasure, and then use that understanding to conform to the ideal of happiness. While admirable in scope, Mills philosophy becomes a contrived and ethnocentric statement with little relevance to his century or ours. Without taking into account the varieties of experience of all humans to complete a universal philosophy, Mills falls short of expectations with his Utilitarianism.
Works Cited
Mills, John Stuart. "Utilitarainsim." Utilitarianism Resources. 2007. 13 Feb 2008 http://www.utilitarianism.com.
Works Cited
Mills, John Stuart. "Utilitarainsim." Utilitarianism Resources. 2007. 13 Feb 2008 http://www.utilitarianism.com.
Lastly, it runs counter to the view that morality is essentially related to the concept of justice. Many critics of this theory argue that, "morality is not based on consequences of actions. Instead, it is based on the fundamental concept of justice" (Lee). In the final analysis, the dilemma in utilitarianism is that it unable to deal with a wide range of moral issue and actins and, as such, tends
Utilitarianism and Rule Utilitarianism Normative Ethics Normative ethics entails accessing the moral standards that relate to right and wrong conducts. Normative ethics provides the ideal for socially correct behaviors. Normative theories are founded on an individual's principles of determining and differentiating between right and wrong (Rachels & Rachels, 2009). Therefore, it is appreciable that normative theories are founded not only by the societies' expectation but also on the principles an individual
Philosophy: Deontology vs. Utilitarianism In this paper I will discuss why I feel Deontology (Immanuel Kant's philosophy) is more correct than Utilitarianism (John Stuart Mill), as applied to a specific issue. First I will give an interpretation of Kant's deontology, and point out the strong and logical points within his arguments; secondly I will offer an analysis of Mill's Utilitarianism, and why I feel Mill's views fall short. Explanation: In Kant's The
As stated in the AICPA code of conduct, the accountants need to put aside their own points-of-view and use the unified school of thought that is presented in the code. This means that the accountants should work on a deontological perspective since the utilitarianism perspective is akin to breaking or bending the rules in order to satisfy their own interests. The professional code of conduct was developed as a result
Moreover, how does he justify saying one would rather be Socrates dissatisfied than a fool who is satisfied? His point is obvious - it is better to have brains and not achieve happiness than be dumb and be contented. But Socrates, brilliant as he was, chose death over exile from Athens, which it can be argued did not lead to happiness in Socrates nor in the students who admired
Utility Ethics: Enron Utility Ethics at Enron Why utility ethics is a valid way of deciding right and wrong Utility ethics are considered to be universal, growth-driven, and offer service to the organization with the only consideration of the right and the wrong. Utility ethics is a valid way of deciding the right and wrong because growth does not always mean that it is right. The same perspective does not apply to failing: