Utility Of The Get Test As A Term Paper

¶ … utility of the GET test as a measure of entrepreneurial potential. Why are People Entrepreneurial?

In order to evaluate the general entrepreneurial tendencies (GET) test it's important to understand the evolving theories that try to explain why people are entrepreneurial. Theory and research in the social sciences support a model of dynamic interactive processes between individual characteristics and the environment which lead to complex behaviors such as the creation of new ventures and other entrepreneurial activities (Huefner, 1991). Neither the characteristics of the individual nor the characteristics of the environment (social, physical, financial, etc.) are sufficient in themselves to explain the phenomenon of entrepreneurship (Huefner, 1991). There is not one set of factors that appears to come together to explain the entrepreneurial person or why they are different from non-entrepreneurs. Past research on the entrepreneur has been primarily based on the assumption that stable personality characteristics can explain how entrepreneurs are different from non-entrepreneurs (Huefner, 1991). The research has been largely based upon trying to identify what traits are common to entrepreneurs. While many definitions of entrepreneurship are currently being used, Gartner (1990) identified eight recurring themes in definitions of entrepreneurship: the entrepreneur (personality traits), innovation, organization creation, creating value, profit or nonprofit, growth, uniqueness, and the owner-manager.

II. The General Entrepreneurial Tendencies Test (GET)

The original GET test was developed in 1987-1988 following a literature review to identify what key psychological characteristics of entrepreneurs were general to other...

...

A more complex picture of the differences between occupational groups emerged when specific enterprising characteristics were examined by the test (Caird, 1999).
The design of the GET is a 54-item questionnaire assessing five dimensions that are traditionally believed to be indicative of entrepreneurial personality (Stormer, 1999). The five dimensions are: Need for Achievement (12 items), Autonomy (6 items), Drive and Determination (12 items), Risk Taking (12 items) and Creativity (6 items) (Stormer, 1999). Each statement on the test requires participants to either agree or disagree with it (Stormer, 1999). The test is scored by giving each dimension a score of 0-12 (0-6 for the Autonomy dimension) with a composite score for the Test of 0-54 (Stormer, 1999). The results of the GET study showed that entrepreneurs did not score significantly higher than lecturers and trainers on the enterprising characteristics of the need for autonomy, creative tendency and calculated risk taking (Caird, 1999). These are the areas where researchers have indicated that entrepreneurs are different from non-entrepreneurs. The study also found that teachers, nurses, and civil servants did not have a significantly different creative tendency to entrepreneurs (Caird, 1999). The conclusion of the study indicated that entrepreneurs do not have the monopoly on enterprising characteristics, but are generally more enterprising than the other occupational groups in the study (Caird, 1999).

III. Personality Trait Theories of Entrepreneurship

For the most part, the instruments used in measuring entrepreneurship have been based on personality models in psychology which purport to measure personality characteristics that are…

Sources Used in Documents:

References

Caird, Sally 1999. General Enterprising Tendency v2 Test GET 2. Website. http://www.get2test.net/copyright/index.htm. 11th December 2010.

Gartner, W.B. (1990), 'What Are We Talking About When We Talk About Entrepreneurship?', Journal of Business Venturing, vol 5, no. 1, pp. 15-28.

Huefer, John, 1991, 'Entrepreneurial research on student subjects does not generalize to real world entrepreneurs', Journal of Small Business Management, viewed December 11, 2010, http://www.allbusiness.com/management/163874-1.html.

Korunka, Christian, Hermann Frank, Manfred Lueger, Josef Mugler, 2003. The entrepreneurial personality in the context of resources, environment, and the startup process a configurational approach. [online] Available at <http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_hb6648/is_1_28/ai_n29057901/pg_11/?tag=content;col1? [Accessed December 11, 2010].


Cite this Document:

"Utility Of The Get Test As A" (2010, December 12) Retrieved April 18, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/utility-of-the-get-test-as-a-122008

"Utility Of The Get Test As A" 12 December 2010. Web.18 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/utility-of-the-get-test-as-a-122008>

"Utility Of The Get Test As A", 12 December 2010, Accessed.18 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/utility-of-the-get-test-as-a-122008

Related Documents

High School Longitudinal Study Dataset Using SPSS Software Scenarios 1. This section determines African citizen's perceptions about their current level of democracy. The study uses 2015 Afrobarometer data to determine whether the current level of African democracy is statistically different from the value of 6. Have series of reforms increased African views on the level of democracy? The study uses the following variables to answer the research question: Level of democracy: ten years ago

Psychological Test Evaluation: Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) Section 1: General Features a) Title: Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) b) Author(s): Aaron T Beck, Robert A Steer c) Publisher: Pearson Education, Inc. d) Publication Year: 1993 e) Age Range: 17 years to adult (Beck & Steer, 1993) f) Qualification Code: CL2 Section 2: Instrument Description a) Instrument Function: What does it measure? BAI is a tool used to measure the level of anxiety in persons aged 18 and above. It is the

I have always thought of myself as fairly outgoing, and being labeled as an introvert seemed strange to me. When I though about it, though, I realized that the test was (of course) fairly accurate in this assessment; I even recalled a few individual items on the test that proved this point -- my need to "reenergize" with some alone-time after hanging out with friends for awhile, or my

With.573 correlation of Unibody directly influencing Body-on-Frame sales in the years sampled. Table 3 provides the results of the query made in SPSS Version 13. Table 3: SPSS Correlation Coefficients Kendall's tau_b BodyOnFrame Correlation Coefficient Sig. (2-tailed) UnibodyCrossover Correlation Coefficient Sig. (2-tailed) Spearman's rho BodyOnFrame Correlation Coefficient Sig. (2-tailed) UnibodyCrossover Correlation Coefficient Sig. (2-tailed) With the statistical analysis showing reasonably strong predictability, the next step is to evaluate the specific 14-month time series for greater insights into the variability and predictability of the data. What

Specifically, the researchers wanted to determine which explanations of academic performance actually gave Penn most additional predictive value, the most bang for the buck. The factors included class rank in high school, SAT II achievement scores on various academic subjects, and SAT I scores on general verbal and quantitative reasoning; the SAT most high school seniors take. Among the predictors, the SAT I reasoning test was by far the weakest,

Health Promotion
PAGES 35 WORDS 9536

Health Promotion: American HIV Prevention in an Era of False Security - an Investigative Study AIDS is one of the most dangerous diseases to affect humankind. AIDS awareness is best-funded and best-taught in the United States of America. This realization is especially apparent when HIV rates are examined in African countries and some Asian countries such as India. Education levels about sexually transmitted diseases in general - and funding for prevention and