¶ … utility of the GET test as a measure of entrepreneurial potential. Why are People Entrepreneurial? In order to evaluate the general entrepreneurial tendencies (GET) test it's important to understand the evolving theories that try to explain why people are entrepreneurial. Theory and research in the social sciences support a model...
Introduction Want to know how to write a rhetorical analysis essay that impresses? You have to understand the power of persuasion. The power of persuasion lies in the ability to influence others' thoughts, feelings, or actions through effective communication. In everyday life, it...
¶ … utility of the GET test as a measure of entrepreneurial potential. Why are People Entrepreneurial? In order to evaluate the general entrepreneurial tendencies (GET) test it's important to understand the evolving theories that try to explain why people are entrepreneurial. Theory and research in the social sciences support a model of dynamic interactive processes between individual characteristics and the environment which lead to complex behaviors such as the creation of new ventures and other entrepreneurial activities (Huefner, 1991).
Neither the characteristics of the individual nor the characteristics of the environment (social, physical, financial, etc.) are sufficient in themselves to explain the phenomenon of entrepreneurship (Huefner, 1991). There is not one set of factors that appears to come together to explain the entrepreneurial person or why they are different from non-entrepreneurs. Past research on the entrepreneur has been primarily based on the assumption that stable personality characteristics can explain how entrepreneurs are different from non-entrepreneurs (Huefner, 1991).
The research has been largely based upon trying to identify what traits are common to entrepreneurs. While many definitions of entrepreneurship are currently being used, Gartner (1990) identified eight recurring themes in definitions of entrepreneurship: the entrepreneur (personality traits), innovation, organization creation, creating value, profit or nonprofit, growth, uniqueness, and the owner-manager. II. The General Entrepreneurial Tendencies Test (GET) The original GET test was developed in 1987-1988 following a literature review to identify what key psychological characteristics of entrepreneurs were general to other enterprising people (Caird, 1999).
A more complex picture of the differences between occupational groups emerged when specific enterprising characteristics were examined by the test (Caird, 1999). The design of the GET is a 54-item questionnaire assessing five dimensions that are traditionally believed to be indicative of entrepreneurial personality (Stormer, 1999). The five dimensions are: Need for Achievement (12 items), Autonomy (6 items), Drive and Determination (12 items), Risk Taking (12 items) and Creativity (6 items) (Stormer, 1999). Each statement on the test requires participants to either agree or disagree with it (Stormer, 1999).
The test is scored by giving each dimension a score of 0-12 (0-6 for the Autonomy dimension) with a composite score for the Test of 0-54 (Stormer, 1999). The results of the GET study showed that entrepreneurs did not score significantly higher than lecturers and trainers on the enterprising characteristics of the need for autonomy, creative tendency and calculated risk taking (Caird, 1999). These are the areas where researchers have indicated that entrepreneurs are different from non-entrepreneurs.
The study also found that teachers, nurses, and civil servants did not have a significantly different creative tendency to entrepreneurs (Caird, 1999). The conclusion of the study indicated that entrepreneurs do not have the monopoly on enterprising characteristics, but are generally more enterprising than the other occupational groups in the study (Caird, 1999). III.
Personality Trait Theories of Entrepreneurship For the most part, the instruments used in measuring entrepreneurship have been based on personality models in psychology which purport to measure personality characteristics that are stable across time and situations and have a broad range of effects (Huefner, 1991). Based on the stable state or trait model, one would expect that the same basic characteristic or constellation of characteristics would affect entrepreneurs and/or potential entrepreneurs at all stages in their careers, at all ages, and in all aspects of their life (Huefner, 1991).
The history of research on the relationship between personality and entrepreneurship shows noticeable parallels to the history of personality traits research in general (Korunka et al. 2003). A number of studies have been conducted investigating the differences between entrepreneurs and non-entrepreneurs and at least three relevant personality characteristics emerged as the potential predictors of entrepreneurial success including: a high need for achievement, internal locus of control and risk-taking propensity (Korunka et al. 2003). IV.
Analysis of the GET The GET appears to be a good predictor of differences in the tendencies of different occupational groups. The problem with the GET and other personality-based tools is there are no simple answers to why people are entrepreneurial. The GET seeks to determine what personality traits predict entrepreneurial success, but these factors are difficult to define and accurately measure as shown by the large number of studies conducted over the last 30 years.
There are numerous personality trait tests that have been shown to have potential for predicting either entrepreneurship or entrepreneurial success, but they vary widely in their success and validity because the definitions of the traits being measured are open to multiple interpretations. For example, the need.
The remaining sections cover Conclusions. Subscribe for $1 to unlock the full paper, plus 130,000+ paper examples and the PaperDue AI writing assistant — all included.
Always verify citation format against your institution's current style guide.