2. The first step is analyzing the facts of the situation. I have privileged information that the client's boyfriend was abusive. This information has been given to me in full confidentiality, and I continue to be obliged to protect the client's privacy. However, the client's death is directly related to the boyfriend's abusive behavior. It is my belief that the boyfriend may pose a significant risk to other people, which is why it will be appropriate in this scenario to consider breaking my confidentiality agreement with the deceased and offering my testimony in a court of law or affidavit.
Second, I must remember that while I do have evidence that abuse occurred in the relationship, I do not have any evidence to suggest that the client's death was a direct result of that abuse. Therefore, I must carefully prepare my testimony to ensure nonmalfecience. I will need to consult with legal counsel if possible, or at least with professionals who have dealt with similar situations in my state. I need...
Moreover, not all states have shield laws. The states that do have such laws are Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee, and the District of Columbia. Each of these states defines and applies a journalist's privilege differently.
C). AAPC Code of Ethics is shorter compared to ACA's, centering more on specific issues such as confidentiality and professional practices, among others. Identified as Principle IV in the AAPC code of ethics, Confidentiality is synonymously identified as 'respect for the integrity and protection of the welfare' of its clients, a claim that is similar to ACA's stance on confidentiality. ACA and AAPC discussed the issue of confidentiality similarly, although AAPC
Concomitantly, the patient should also be kept informed of such actions, as it directly affects his or her confidentiality status. The physician should then advise the patient regarding the necessary actions or allowance to be made for the destruction of the records. 6. As mentioned above, it is absolutely vital to identify individuals and organizations with access to the databases containing his or her medical records. The reason for this
Question Three The most important thing that a police psychologist should do when evaluating an officer for a position on the SWAT team is to inform that individual that the information that the officer reveals to the psychologist (and any conclusions that the psychologist comes to) will be shared with the officer's superiors for the purpose of determining if the officer can join the SWAT team. The psychologist is bound to
The client is then hesitant to sue over a breach of trust because the client feels bonded to the therapist and does not want to hurt the therapist by suing. Another issue with confidentiality breaching is that the client has revealed secrets to the therapist and may be concerned that a lawsuit will cause those secrets to become part of public record or be testified about on the stand (Grabois,
Confidentiality Breaches in Clinical Practice The confidentiality and privacy of patients are considered as one of the fundamental freedoms that they should enjoy and are safeguarded under Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPPA). It is also a precept of the American Medical Association’s Code of Ethics and the Hippocratic Oath. The breach of confidentiality is unethical and illegal. Medical professionals are under the obligation of protecting the patient’s confidentiality.
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now