Violent Vs. Non-Violent Revolution Violent Revolutions And Essay

Violent vs. Non-Violent Revolution Violent revolutions and non-violent revolutions began to unfold with great regularity after the 1400's, 1500's and 1600's when much to most of the world became colonized by the Dutch, the French, the British and the Spanish. Both the United States and modern-day India became free from the same ruling country, that being Great Britain. However, the differences are quite stark when one gets beyond that similarity. Even though violent revolutions are often required or at least quicker, the independence of India in the 1940's proved that non-violent revolution can be equally effective, albeit tumultuous in its own right.

Comparison

Great Britain at one time controlled most of the world, it seemed, along with Spain, France and a few other countries. Indeed, the land now owned by the United States was, at one time or another, controlled by the British, the French, the Spaniards and their descendants and variants. India also passed from country to country over its existence. The dutch controlled the area for more than two centruies and then switched to the Danes for half a century or so. France had a claim of its own for the better part of two centuries. However, the country that ruled part or all of India the most really was the British as they were involved in the area for nearly half a millennia, running from 1612 to 1947 when India...

...

Indians engaged in non-violent protests and simply refused to aid or abet the controlling British authority. There was some violent actions and activities here and there but the end-result was eventually the partitioning of India into what is now India and what is now Pakistan. The partitioning was even conceded as necessary by Mahatma Gandhi at one point because he felt that a separate Indian and Muslim state were needed to prevet strife. This happened, for the most part, but actions such as the assassination of Gandhi by one of his own people proved that not everyone on "his side" was aligned with the precepts and facets of non-violent resistance and protest.
The American and Indian revolutions were similar in that they were fighting back against the British in reaction to not being allowed to participate in their own government and their country's own destiny. Rather than being free and independent nations, both India/Pakistan and the United States were controlled locally and afar through brutal regulation and punitive behaviors as well as lack of freedom and high taxation. However, the differences…

Sources Used in Documents:

References


Cite this Document:

"Violent Vs Non-Violent Revolution Violent Revolutions And" (2014, January 05) Retrieved April 26, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/violent-vs-non-violent-revolution-violent-180557

"Violent Vs Non-Violent Revolution Violent Revolutions And" 05 January 2014. Web.26 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/violent-vs-non-violent-revolution-violent-180557>

"Violent Vs Non-Violent Revolution Violent Revolutions And", 05 January 2014, Accessed.26 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/violent-vs-non-violent-revolution-violent-180557

Related Documents

This indicates that society is not safe as the result of the death penalty, so long as life in prison is a real and fully-enforced option for prisoners who commit terrible crimes. There is also the very real issue of innocent people who are murdered by the state. Of course, some proponents of capital punishment argue that from a utilitarian point-of-view, more guilty people are executed than innocent people. But

Since 1996, military abuses have forced one million villagers to flee their homes. The presence and conduct of the military are central to the plight of these civilians. Military operations have placed a particularly heavy burden on rural populations affecting their ability to sustain livelihoods. Cases of rape and sexual violence committed by military personnel, many of them against young girls and adolescents, have been reported by human rights organizations. It should also

Egypt The revolution in Egypt of January and February 2011 led to the resignation of the nation's president, Hosni Mubarak. The revolution put the population in a state of potential chaos and some political commentators felt that it would be difficult for Egypt to become a functioning society in the near future. This was not the first time that the Middle Eastern region saw a political revolution within one of its

The Analysis However, it is the not past this point that this study needs to go, rather it is at this point that we need to stop and take into analyze the information that is cited here, and to see if that analysis takes us in other directions. There is really very little detailed information about the discussions and debate that might have surrounded the creation of the Civil Constitution of

Rap Music - a Soundtrack of Revolution Soundtrack of Revolution for the Generations of Rap Artists Since 1980s Hip hop is a culture that encompasses a vast corporation of artistic forms, which originated from marginalized subcultures within the South Bronx in New York City during the 1970s. This culture encloses four distinct elements, representing diverse manifestations of its founding reasons: the rap music (oral), disc jockey (turntablism), graffiti art (visual), and break-dancing

11 His ridicule views about the first family made the Russian citizens to regard him as worthless or inferior because of his resistance and the general talk he had on issues. Despite there being a demanding leadership crisis that could cause challenges to even the best leaders of the time, the presence of Tsarina and Rasputin worsened the conditions. They reshuffled the cabinet, sacking talented cabinet ministers and in their