Why College Students Should Study Philosophy Term Paper

PAGES
5
WORDS
1581
Cite

¶ … Philosophy Throughout history, philosophers have been alternatively lauded, vilified or ignored altogether depending on the exigencies of the day. While the significance of philosophy was clear to the ancient Greeks, its value may seem less relevant in the 21st century, particularly to young adults who have grown up with technology that provides instantaneous answers to important questions rather than requiring deep analytical thinking about what is real and what is not. To determine the facts, this paper reviews the relevant literature to explain the real value of philosophy today, followed by a discussion concerning whether philosophy is an important part of the college education, or is it just a lot of useless arguing. In addition, an analysis concerning whether philosophy opposes or reinforces common sense is followed by an assessment concerning whether philosophers can be deemed experts on anything. Finally, a discussion concerning the extent to which philosophy plays a role in the broader culture is followed by a summary of the research and important findings about the significance of philosophy today in the conclusion.

The Value of Philosophy

Some authorities argue that philosophy is no longer relevant in a modern world and has only limited value for certain purposes. For instance, Marino maintains that, "We do not need philosophy to underwrite our views of justice, knowledge, or almost anything else. If it is good for anything, it is for the rather marginal purpose of squaring apparently inconsistent theories" (12). Likewise, Cahn points out that there is growing skepticism in the value of philosophy in an increasingly pragmatic world where science holds the answers to humankind's big questions. In this regard, Cahn points out that, "Many men, under the influence of science or of practical affairs, are inclined to doubt whether philosophy is anything better than innocent but useless trifling, hair-splitting distinctions, and controversies on matters concerning which knowledge is impossible" (418).

The dictionary definition of philosophy, though, suggests that it is more relevant today than ever before. Derived from the Greek philosophia ("love of knowledge"), philosophy simply means the "pursuit of wisdom [through] systematic investigation" (Word origin and history for philosophy 4). Indeed, Cahn suggests that those who question of value of philosophy today are misguided concerning its true significance. For instance, Cahn notes that, "This view of philosophy appears to result, partly from a wrong conception of the ends of life, partly from a wrong conception of the kind of goods which philosophy strives to achieve" (418). When the purpose and goal of philosophical inquiry is understood, it is reasonable to suggest that most people would agree that it remains valuable today, even as part of a college education as discussed below.

The Relevance of Philosophy as Part of a College Education

The very manner in which people in the West think and understand the world around them is based on the philosophical tenets established by the ancient Greek philosophers, so studying these origins represents a timely and valuable addition to any college education. In fact, even when classroom discussion degenerate into outright shouting matches between students with opposing views, these exchanges serve as a catalyst to insightful reflection and the clarification of people really think. In many cases, people may not even know what they really think about something until they articulate their thoughts in these types of exchanges, and even science majors (perhaps especially science majors) can benefit from this type of discourse since it can results in questioning the common sense that most people possess as discussed below.

The Relationship between Philosophy and Common Sense

There is a clear relationship between philosophy and common sense, and the extent to which its goal and purpose of philosophy are understood will likely be the extent to which it results in the questioning of common sense approaches to merely surviving the human condition. For instance, according to the definition provided by Black's Law Dictionary, "common sense" means "sound practical judgment; that degree of intelligence and reason, as exercised upon the relations of persons and things and the ordinary affairs of life, which is possessed by the generality of mankind" (276). In some cases, though, meaningful philosophical inquiry can oppose even long-held and mainstream common sense. In fact, Cahn believes that this is the true value of philosophy: "The man who has no tincture of philosophy goes through life imprisoned in the prejudices derived from common sense, from the habitual beliefs of his age or his nation, and from convictions which have...

...

Although it was the scientific method that disproved this type of common sense, it was philosophical inquiry into the true nature of the universe that resulted in this interest in the first place. Therefore, although philosophy can reinforce common sense when supported by evidence, the real value of philosophy is derived from its ability to oppose common sense to create innovation and original thought. In this regard, Cahn concludes that, "Philosophy, though unable to tell us with certainty what is the true answer to the doubts which it raises, is able to suggest many possibilities which enlarge our thoughts and free them from the tyranny of custom" (419). Given these desirable outcomes, the question turns to whether philosophers are experts on anything and this question is answered below.
Are philosophers experts on anything?

Paradoxically, philosophers are only able to become experts on anything by abandoning their profession. For example, Cahn points out that, "If you ask a mathematician, a mineralogist, a historian, or any other man of learning, what definite body of truths has been ascertained by his science, his answer will last as long as you are willing to listen" (419). By very sharp contrast, because philosophical inquiry does not produce the same types of outcomes as scientific inquiry, philosophers would be the first to concede that they lack this same type of expertise. In this regard, Cahn adds that, "If you put the same question to a philosopher, he will, if he is candid, have to confess that his study has not achieved positive results such as have been achieved by other sciences" (419).

Certainly, this does not mean that philosophers cannot know a great deal, but it does mean that when philosophical inquiry produces definite knowledge, the process loses its philosophical qualities. As Cahn emphasizes, "It is true that this is partly accounted for by the fact that, as soon as definite knowledge concerning any subject becomes possible, this subject ceases to be called philosophy, and becomes a separate science" (419). Given that philosophers cannot be experts on anything, the question arises whether philosophy plays any role in the broader culture in which it is practiced, and this question is answered below.

Does philosophy play any role in the broader culture?

The degree to which philosophy plays any role in the broader culture relates to the contributions it makes to improving the human condition in a hostile world. Being intangible products of the mind, these contributions are less discernible that the contributions made by physical science, for example, where inventions of all types have improved life for most people even if they are totally unaware of the scientific processes that were involved (Cahn 419). As Cahn points out, though, philosophy cannot make this same type of claim for contributing to the human condition. In this regard, Cahn emphasizes, "Utility does not belong to philosophy. If the study of philosophy has any value at all for others than students of philosophy, it must be only indirectly, through its effects upon the lives of those who study it" (419).

Because humankind does not live by bread alone, though, philosophy does play a role in the broader culture in which it is practiced because it does in fact the lives of those who study it in profound ways that can produce more direct and tangible contributions to the human condition (Cahn 419). In an era when knowledge workers and intellectual property have assumed increasing importance, the transformation of philosophical inquiry into concrete outcomes has become even more commonplace. As Cahn concludes, "Even in the existing world the goods of the mind are at least as important as the goods of the body. It is exclusively among the goods of the mind that the value of philosophy is to be found" (419).

conclusion

The research showed that the English word "philosophy" comes from the Greek philosophia, or "love of knowledge"). Strictly applied, philosophy means the "pursuit of wisdom through systematic investigation," a definition that resembles the scientific method which has widespread credibility in a credulous world. By contrast, though, the value of philosophy has been increasingly questioned by skeptics who argue that circuitous reasoning and abstract arguments do little or nothing to advance humankind's progress. Indeed, some critics maintain that philosophy no longer has relevance in a modern world. The research also showed, though, that the value of philosophy does not relate to these same…

Sources Used in Documents:

Works Cited

Black's Law Dictionary. St. Paul, MN: West Publishing Company, 1991. Print.

Cahn, Steven M. Exploring Philosophy: An Introductory Anthology. New York: Oxford University Press, 2004. Print.

Marino, Gordon D. (1994, May 6). "Shattering Philosophy's Mirror: A Conversation with Richard Rorty." Commonweal 121(9): 11-14. Print.

"Word origin and history for philosophy." (2015). Dictionary.com. Web.


Cite this Document:

"Why College Students Should Study Philosophy" (2015, December 12) Retrieved May 3, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/why-college-students-should-study-philosophy-2159578

"Why College Students Should Study Philosophy" 12 December 2015. Web.3 May. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/why-college-students-should-study-philosophy-2159578>

"Why College Students Should Study Philosophy", 12 December 2015, Accessed.3 May. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/why-college-students-should-study-philosophy-2159578

Related Documents

The "philosophy" in the sense allow us to carefully reflect and conscientiously revise our outlook. The person who holds such a worldview can be said to be critically present in his or her culture, society, and political community and to be truly educated. The philosophy raises several questions about human existence, their aim, and human minds. An attempt to unify these various analyses into a comprehensive and consistent understanding of reality is

Liberal Arts Education Should College Students be required to take Courses Outside of Their Major Field of Study? An education that lacks of a world view may be more harmful than meets the eye. One could reasonably argue that the question of whether diversified educational background has value is highly dependent on what you value. There are a multitude of monetary reasons for an incoming freshman to concentrate on a specific field

Critical Thinking Skills When today's university student is asked to apply critical thinking skills to a specific social problem, does that student understand what is being asked and how to go about applying critical thinking skills? When questions from the professor involve, for example, the current dilemma in the United States Congress -- Democrats and Republicans engaged in a near-constant standoff when it comes to ideology and legislation -- does the

Community Colleges in America In 1983 and 1984, a dozen major reports on the United States' schools were published. All stressed the need for "excellence" in education. These reports are the subject of: Excellence in Education: Perspectives on Policy and Practice. The reports pertaining to higher education were published by The BusinessHigher Education Forum, and saw higher education as "unable to train skilled managers and technicians that they believed industry needed."

Karl Popper / Allen Bloom Why indeed would scholars, teachers, journalists, parents and other close observers of society be surprised that many young people are, as Bloom says, given to go along "day by day ... gratifying the desire" that occurs to them in serendipitous moments? The list of possible answers to the question of why many students are not "furnished persons" would be a long and complex one. Clearly there

By "personal" and "social" goals, I meant the achievement of ideals set by the individual for himself/herself and for the society in general, respectively. Education and learning gained from it is meaningless if the individual cannot enjoy and optimize it to achieve his/her own needs and aspirations in life. However, similarly, one's success in achieving his/her aspirations becomes irrelevant if these achievements do not benefit society. A recognize the need