Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
¶ … Wilson (James Q. Wilson, Bureaucracy: What Government Agencies Do Why They Do it), describe discuss judges (Courts) bureaucrats world differently. You book James Q. Wilson, Bureaucracy: What Government Agencies Do Why They Do It edition.
The world from the perspective of judges, and, respectively, bureaucrats
While many have the tendency to look at judges and bureaucrats as largely being similar in scope and behavior, the reality is that they are really different. The environments in which they function in are very different and most organizations and tasks they work with also differ largely. Judges and bureaucrats can actually work against each-other in some cases, with the latter sometimes having authority over a series of legislations that the former want to change. As a consequence, the two groups can have opposing interests and can go as far as to use all of their influence and resources with the purpose to achieve their goals.
Many judges who express interest in devising a law have a limited understanding of the likeliness that the respective law is going to be effective or of the efforts that a community would have to go through in order to actually be able to benefit as a result of the law. According to...
"But of course few judges are likely to have such a good understanding of prisons, any more than they are likely to know much about schools, police departments, welfare agencies, or regulatory commissions." (Wilson, 294) Even in cases when they are determined to make a positive change, judges risk triggering a chain of events that can eventually damage the system as a whole.
In order to be able to actually make a difference, judges would have to gain a complex understanding of agencies they want to deal with. By learning more about agencies and their management, judges can eventually play an active role in improving conditions in these respective agencies without risking to implement reform strategies that can actually have a negative…
Works cited:
Wilson, J.Q. "Bureaucracy: What Government Agencies Do and why They Do it." (Basic Books, 2000)
American Government Response Summarizing the Readings: In his article "Constitutional Democracy and Bureaucratic Power," Peter Woll discusses the administrative branch of the government and the various departments who are in control of the funds which keep federal and state governments working. The bureaucracy is a highly influential part of the government and has a degree of control over both the President and Congress with far fewer legal checks to their actions than
Police Reform in Post-Authoritarian Brazil A majority of new democracies entail an unbelievable illogicality of an immensely feeble citizenship coalesced with a stern description of the constitutional guarantees. In order to explicate this disparity it would be prudent to contemplate the significance of political institutions regarding representation of citizen, which were prevalent subsequent to the military establishments attributed as troublesome and a majority of the new restrictions. A few defined in
value of the traditional managerial approach to public administration? Accountability Economy Effectiveness Providing for political representation in public administration Which of the following best describes "externalities"? They are profits They are always in the public interests They are costs absorbed by the manufacturers of products They are created by economic activities but not accounted for in market transactions The judiciary's power to dispense with the harsh application of law is known as: Adjudication Equal protection Equity Constitution: Comprehensively provides for federal and state administration Comprehensively
For Bush, the "formation and refining of policy proposals" (Kingdon's second process stream in policymaking) came to fruition when he got elected, and began talking to legislators about making educators and schools accountable. Bush gave a little, and pushed a little, and the Congress make its own changes and revisions, and the policy began to take shape. The third part of Kingdon's process stream for Bush (politics) was getting the
Community Oriented Policing new and comprehensive strategy against crime: Community Policing: For the purpose of reducing neighborhood crimes, creating a sense of security and reduce fear of crimes among the citizens and improving the quality of life in the community, the community policing strategy will be proved to be the most effective one. The accomplishment of all these objectives to develop a healthy and clean society can be done by combining the
Organizational Trends of Criminal Justice Criminal justice organizations were typically comprised from public resources and structures, yet there have been movements towards different style organizations that do not rely on the public domain for their support. The privatization of criminal justice organizations is essentially when such organizations are removed from the public control and placed into private ownership. A major reason for the privatization of such criminal justice resources is because