Paper Example Undergraduate 3,478 words

Witness of Preaching by Thomas

Last reviewed: January 22, 2011 ~18 min read

Witness of Preaching by Thomas G. Long Note: the book is based on the idea that ministers and preachers are called from within the church instead of being sent to it from the outside world. Based on this, the entire books provides insights to not just pastors but also seminary students on how they can prepare their speeches to influence their gathering on the omnipresence of God and all his glory for not just the community but also the world. The book is written in a simple and easy language structure so as to appeal to all the pastors and students inclined to learn the ways that they can preach more effectively.

The 'Witness of Preaching' is an important book in the domain of insightful religious interpretation and has been published in two editions, the first releasing in 1989 followed by a more thorough revision in 1995. The second edition of the classic text of 'witness of preaching' is far more thorough, inspiring and assisting in the realm of religious discussion then the first edition released more than half a decade ago. The most obvious improvement in the second edition was the language structure used as it was far more open towards all classes of pastors and seminary students. Long focused specifically on certain chapters like the one on biblical exegesis, giving it more depth and dynamics. He has added quite a few examples of various documented versions of popular texts as well as numerous illustrations and models of sermon formats and deductions. Homiletics is an area that Long continues to explore and intertwine throughout the book, he updates the works and viewpoints of the important scholars mentioned in the first edition in the revision released in 1995 as well as the incorporates the role of new technology like the use of videos and PowerPoint in the delivery of sermons and speeches.

The common theme between both editions was Long's use of the theological perceptions of the role of witnesses documented in the Gospel. He uses these perceptions to design and lead every angle in the structure of all the sermons whether it be something intricate like the interpretation of the biblical text or something dynamic like the mannerisms and transference of the sermon. The text below is an excerpt taken from the first edition of the book that exemplifies how the book can provide insight and guidance to any and all pastors -- the experts as well as the novices:

"...whenever we include a 'slice of life' in a sermon, we are making implicit theological claims whether we know it or not. By the kinds of experiences and images we choose to employ in sermons, we are forming, implicitly or explicitly, specific connections between the nature of contemporary life and the character of the gospel. A sentimental sermon story, for example, implies that the gospel itself is sentimental. A sermon full of experiences evolving only clergy telegraphs the message that real faith is reserved for the ordained. Or suppose that a preacher decides to relate in a sermon several stories of people who learned to trust God in the midst of difficult and painful circumstances. If this preacher is honest about these experiences, the accounts will include some of the ambiguity and unresolved questions surely present whenever people struggle from suffering toward faith. A truthful relating of the experiences, in other words, carries with it the theological claim that the "yes" of the gospel does not instantly make the "no" of human doubt and struggle disappear. if, on the other hand, the preacher files the rough edges off these experiences and transforms them into stories with simple, happy and purely victorious endings, an unrealistic triumphant picture of the gospel is conveyed, with little room for unfinished suffering and continuing struggle."

Witness of Preaching: Summary

The 'witness of preaching' presents homiletics in a whole new sphere and Long explains that the aspect of homiletics is no longer a mere philosophy of 'applied theology', in fact it is an integral and hugely influential discipline now in the theological spheres. Homiletics has for the longest time been used primarily as the most efficient tool to communicate the theological interpretations and deductions of a biblical text. However, in comparing to the approach taken by St. Paul, Long's approach shows that the concept of homiletics is built around the shortcomings and flaws of the churches that consequently contributes to the foundation of the sermons and preaching styles.

Furthermore, Long in the book emphasizes on how the pastor or the preacher is someone who comes from the community and speaks from within them as opposed to stand above and deliver to them. This allows the sermon to really pierce its message through as it allows the preachers to design and modify their preaching styles in accordance to the needs and structure of the community and the church that they serve. This he makes clear in all his exegetical methods applied in the book.

In summary, if one was to analyze this book the following aspects would become clear:

The preacher can clearly comprehend the purpose of the sermon

The process becomes more lucid

The purpose of the church in the community becomes clear

The status of the preacher becomes more humane and from within the community as opposed to above it

The structure and nature of the church is also highlighted within the structure of the sermons

The relation between the existence of God, the community and the preacher are established using theological aspects

The aspects missing from the book that, if added, could have brought a whole new dimension to the text include the following:

There is no explicit ecclesiology used to support and back the processes and purposes of the sermons highlighted in the book

The one thing strongly lacking in the book was the backup up of all the principles and theories presented with their practical applications

Witness of Preaching: Report

The primary aspect of Long's 'The Witness of Preaching' is his fresh and accessible approach towards the management of homiletics. The fact of the matter is that Long is a very well-versed individual when it comes to the most intricate and extensive literature available on homiletics and refers to popular and renowned preachers like Fred Craddock and David Buttrick in his book to support his ideas and viewpoints on the subject and its role in the church. The fresh approach adopted by Long becomes apparent in the very first chapter of the book where he treats the phenomenon of homiletics as a theology as opposed to merely a tool for communication in sermons. As has been previously mentioned, Long has used the phenomenon of homiletics as an entire discipline and not just one aspect of a discipline. Homiletics has previously been only used restrictively to the rhetoric and mere communication tactics. On the other hand, Long further draws inspiration from the text of the Old Testament and the New Testament and explains that the preachers are the ones who "bear witness" to the practical applications and implications of the theological and theoretical sermons that they give. In my opinion, it is this first chapter that perhaps is worth the price asked for the book. In fact if the chapter was published as a pamphlet, it would stand incredibly well on its own in the literary world as an insightful and extremely helpful excerpt of the world of ordained ministry.

It is the background set in the first chapter, of the preachers bearing witness that sets the stage and the tempo for the following chapters. The book focuses on the flexibility needed in the sermons and methods of preaching as opposed to following the conventions and traditional principles and regulations. Long support innovative and flexible decisions made by the preacher based upon the situation as well as community he is preaching to. For this purpose, Long focuses on providing practical examples of the structural formats of sermons, as well as the most effective and motivation introductions and conclusions without being too sophisticated or simple either. My only criticism is that there should have perhaps been a few more examples given to strengthen and clarify the point further.

One other concern when reading the book for me was the concept of hermeneutics and how it was dealt with in the book. Of course, interpreting the text and context of bible fully is a very difficult thing to do by anyone's standards. Furthermore, when one is striving to provide efficient advice or suggestions on how to best interpret the biblical text is even more difficult. Hence, when Long attempted to actually give advice, in my opinion, he should have tried to do so to his fullest capability. But reading the book does leave me wanting a lot more in that department. In one of the earlier chapters, he writes that the phenomenon of biblical preaching 'does not mean merely talking about the Bible, using the Bible to bolster doctrinal arguments, or applying biblical 'principles' to everyday life' (pg 48). If I was a preacher who was having a difficult time being 'biblical', then the above statement would make complete sense to me. The fact is that the Biblical Scripture does incorporate numerous concepts, values and regulations that cannot be treated or understood out of the context in which they are presented. Also, the context in which they are present is also intertwined with each other in an intricate web which also needs to be understood first to fully understand the background of the principles thus formed and the guidance given thereof.

In case that this is not done efficiently, the preaching can be a mere backdrop of excerpts of Christ's life and death as well as the incidents in his life without having any really or authentic impact on the lives of the modern community. The downside here, however, is that Long, despite making a valid point, is very inconsistent with his thoughts in certain areas especially when dealing with domestic principles and codes that are highlighted in the New Testament, for instance: 'Slaves, be obedient to those who are your earthly masters'. Here, using this, Long says that religion and its principles highlighted in the Gospel must remain separate from the traditions of the social structure. He says that the task may be difficult but:

"The point is that texts which scream cultural bias are also gospel texts, and texts which shout the gospel are also culturally conditioned. There is no surgical procedure for separating the tissues, no guaranteed way to separate the wheat from the chaff. Hearing the claim of God in and through a biblical text always demands and act of faithful imagination, a refusing to let a text go until it has blessed us..." (pg 52).

Long however fails to explain the variations or differences between this 'blessing' from the regulations or principles highlighted in the biblical scriptures. The only difference or point of separation that he does refer to in the book in the form of 'faithful imagination', however, he does not go further into explaining what this phenomenon really is. As the interpretation of the biblical texts is difficult to begin with, a detail insight on this phenomenon would have further helped the reader and preacher to master his sermon delivery. In spite of these criticisms, Long's delivery on the phenomenon of homiletics is incredible and this is what affected or influenced me most positively. This will be discussed in detail in the next section.

Witness of Preaching: Life, work and Ministry

When reading the 'witness of preaching', I didn't realize that the most influential aspect of the book in my life would be homiletics. Before I delve into how the book influenced me, it is important to define the term -- homiletics. Simply put homiletics is literally translated into a gathering or to gather/assemble together. In the context of theology, homiletics is defined as the implementation of generalized principles and regulations into the more specific circumstances as required in the situation. The practitioners of homiletics are called homilists.

Homiletics has also appeared to be as merely the study of the structure and the transference of a sermon or a religious speech at the church or in a religious gathering. I have also further understood it to be a study of the investigation, categorization, organization, groundwork, training, structure and delivery of the sermons, hence expanding and incorporating a large array of activities from the part of the pastor or preacher. This is why homiletics is such a critical part of the book by Thomas Long. If the sermons loose effect, there will be very limited ways left for the church to instigate communal spirituality. Thomas Long hence gives great importance to not just the practice of homiletics but also its history to give testament to how and why sermons can be of such a huge influence on a community.

In the next few pages I will give a few literary details of how I have perceived homiletics, and the phenomenon of preaching in general, over the course of their history and theology:

Branch of pastoral theology

When looking at the standardized definition accepted of homiletics, it has already been explained that it the domain or department of communication that allows a rhetoric to be used for specified situations. This definition, I realize, was followed very closely all through the 19th century and with good effect, especially when I analyze the works of philosophers like John Broadus. However, on the contrary there are also philosophers like Karl Barth who all through the 19th century have stepped away from this standardized definition and have asserted that homiletics should not be restricted to merely playing the role of rhetoric-structuring. It is only in the 20th century that the real discussion between the association of rhetoric and homiletics really surfaced. It is hence why I feel this book was so insightful for me having grown up in an atmosphere where the relationship between the two factors is still a subject of debate for many religious and philosophical schools.

Managerial structure of preaching

The entire management of preaching rests solely with the bishops that have been appointed. All of the priests only giver sermons if and when sanctioned and permitted by the bishops in charge. What I found astonishing was that even the renowned and established priests like St. Augustine and St. Chrysostom were no exception to this rule -- whenever they preached, they did so with the permission of the respective bishops in charged at the time. This is not to say that the priests had to seek special permission before every preaching session, but the bishops did intervene and keep a check on the subjects being covered. For a non-denominational preacher however the case is very different. While most churches follow a very rigid structure of training and chain of commands, the non-denominational structure allows anyone with a strong background on religion to preach based on a vote-off with other non-denominational preachers in his group. This allows the entire structure of preaching having a very democratic setup and a very liberating structure for homiletics preaching. Long's approach to homiletics can be very adeptly and flexibly followed within a non-denominational setting as it allows a fresh and innovative style of preaching to be used. Since there really is no delegation of authority in the non-denominational structure of preaching, the overall good of the community is what leads the discussion for the content of preaching more so then anything else. Furthermore, the interpretations of the text can be done explicitly for the situations being faced by the community as well. The language structure that was used was again very flexible and the non-denominational preaching is structured so that it never contradicts the teachings of the established church but only presents a fresh and more open approach an interpretation of the text available.

Preaching and Present Day

When we analyze the present day structure of the church and the society, there are clear patterns of the phenomenon of Scholasticism in more than one way -- the different aspects include not just the structure in which we trace Scholasticism in the modern day church but also in the context. In this structure, the modern day sermons can design to be ethical, inflexible, chronological, or liturgical -- there are of course instances when one aspect can dominate another in a sermon.

However belonging to anon denominational structure allows me to really incorporate more flexibility in my sermons. Reading 'Witness of Preaching' by Thomas Long really allowed me to explore the different aspects in the modern society that need to be addressed and cannot be within the rigid structure of the church. Some of the aspects that I have incorporated as a non-denominational pastor after reading the witness of preaching are highlighted below:

You’re 81% through this paper. Sign up to read the full paper.

Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log in
130,000+ paper examples AI writing assistant Citation generator Cancel anytime
Cite This Paper
PaperDue. (2011). Witness of Preaching by Thomas. PaperDue. https://www.paperdue.com/essay/witness-of-preaching-by-thomas-5135

Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.