This paper examines Afrocentrism as both a political movement and a scholarly field, with particular focus on Afrocentric Egyptology. Drawing on Ann Macy Roth's essay "Building Bridges to Afrocentrism," the paper outlines the movement's five core tenets — including the belief that ancient Egyptians were Black, that Greek civilization derived from Egyptian culture, and that European conspiracy suppresses Afrocentric history. The paper also explores Roth's preferred approach to these claims: rather than direct refutation, she advocates addressing the underlying fallacies, such as the scientific invalidity of racial categorization, to foster constructive dialogue between Afrocentrists and mainstream Egyptologists.
According to the Encyclopedia Britannica, Afrocentrism is a term first used in the 1980s by Molefi Asante, an African-American scholar and political activist. Its proponents believe that European and other Western colonists dominated Africans through enslavement and, later, political oppression, and that modern European and other Western societies are either indifferent toward, or specifically opposed to, any efforts of self-determination on the part of displaced Africans (Encyclopedia Britannica, 2007).
Today, Afrocentrism is a field purportedly supported by scholarly research and literature. According to Ann Macy Roth, Visiting Assistant Professor of Egyptology, as it is practiced in the United States, Afrocentrism — and specifically Afrocentric Egyptology — is "less a scholarly field than a political and educational movement, aimed at increasing the self-esteem and confidence of African-Americans by stressing the achievements of African civilizations, principally ancient Egypt" (1995).
Roth goes on to describe Afrocentric Egyptology as a philosophy and set of beliefs promoted to students as early as grade school and continuing through the university level, presented in everything from popular books and academic textbooks to educational posters and even major brewery advertising.
Building Bridges to Afrocentrism: A Letter to My Egyptological Colleagues outlines five particular tenets of the movement:
First, the belief that ancient Egyptians were Black. Second, that ancient Egyptian culture was more advanced — and therefore superior — to other celebrated ancient civilizations. Third, that Greek civilizations co-opted much of their intellectual advances directly from Black Egyptians. Fourth, that more modern African and European cultures owe much of their intellectual and cultural heritage to ancient Egyptian influences. Fifth, that a wide-ranging conspiracy rooted in racism is responsible for undermining the broader dissemination and appreciation of Afrocentric philosophy and historical knowledge.
While Roth disputes the historical accuracy and factual correctness of these contentions, she maintains that a more delicate and academically sound response is required to avoid perpetuating unnecessary antagonism toward Egyptology on the part of Afrocentric proponents. For example, rather than directly disputing the belief that ancient Egyptians were Black, she prefers to emphasize the underlying fallacy of racial categorization itself. Anthropologists have long rejected the traditional racial classifications familiar to most people, continually reminding us that all Homo sapiens are identical from an evolutionary perspective, as they are all members of one species.
"Roth's preferred academic approach to disputed claims"
Roth's essay ultimately calls for constructive engagement rather than confrontation. By addressing the logical and scientific fallacies that underpin Afrocentric claims — particularly the unscientific nature of racial categorization and the primacy of original textual sources — she argues that Egyptologists can respond to Afrocentric Egyptology in a way that is both intellectually honest and sensitive to the legitimate political and cultural concerns that motivate the movement.
You’re 66% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 1 section.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.