This paper examines two interrelated dimensions of modern airport security. The first section surveys the primary methods airports use to protect passengers and cargo from terrorist threats, including scanning technologies, crowd management, blast-mitigation infrastructure, safer aircraft materials, and closed-circuit surveillance systems. The second section critically evaluates the civil liberties concerns raised by these enhanced security measures, addressing issues of privacy invasion, intrusive body searches, racial profiling of Arab-descent travelers, restrictions on free speech, and limitations on permitted carry-on items. Together, the two sections illustrate the ongoing tension between collective security imperatives and the individual rights of travelers.
There are numerous ways in which airports protect their passengers and cargo against terrorist attacks. For instance, airports use scanning technologies with the aid of which baggage, clothing, and passengers themselves are screened for metals, chemical compounds, solutions, weapons, explosives, and similar threats. This technique is applied to both carry-on luggage and hold luggage, which are placed on a conveyor belt and passed through scanning machines.
Aside from scanners, airports protect passengers, attendants, and cargo by reducing crowdedness in order to diminish the attractiveness of large gatherings to terrorist attacks. This means that terminals are kept open and that efforts are made to increase the fluidity of passenger movement from one airport location to another.
Airports also continually communicate and collaborate with security product manufacturers. These efforts are not entirely aimed at reducing the threat of terrorist attacks; they focus more on reducing the negative impact should such an attack materialize. One example is Aegis, a technology that incorporates special features into airport infrastructure in order to reduce the blast of an explosion.
Similar technologies are used to integrate safer materials into the manufacturing of aircraft. In cases of crashes, these new technologies would cause smoke to rise into the atmosphere rather than being inhaled by crash survivors; they would also delay the moment of a plane exploding due to gas leakages.
There is also the widely used surveillance system, which installs cameras throughout all areas of the airport. Airport security employees closely monitor the behavior of people in the airport, unsupervised luggage, and other suspicious elements, and act accordingly. They also store recordings and support local authorities in conducting investigations.
The enhanced levels of airport security have generated a series of debates about the ways in which they negatively impact the civil rights of travelers. Take, for instance, the privacy that could be infringed upon by being recorded on a video camera while boarding a plane, or while in the company of a partner other than one's spouse.
There is also the multitude of checkups to which travelers are subjected, beginning with the general verification of documents and extending to the very personal and invasive body search. In some cases, women are asked to remove their shoes so that the heels can be scanned. While these measures are not necessarily illegal, they can be invasive and demeaning. The American Civil Liberties Union has documented numerous complaints from travelers who feel their dignity was compromised during airport screening procedures.
"Discriminatory searches targeting Arab-descent and outspoken travelers"
"Limits on food, medicine, and personal items breach passenger rights"
You’re 65% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.