Allergic Rhinitis SOAP Note: Episodic Clinical Case Study
This paper presents an episodic, focused SOAP note for a 28-year-old Caucasian female presenting with recurrent spring-season runny nose, itchy eyes, sneezing, and throat irritation. The subjective section details her chief complaint, medical and social history, and a comprehensive review of systems. The objective section documents vital signs and physical examination findings, including pale boggy nasal mucosa and erythematous eyes. The assessment identifies allergic rhinitis (hay fever) as the primary diagnosis, supported by classic seasonal symptom patterns. Five differential diagnoses—chronic rhinosinusitis, seasonal rhinitis, perennial rhinitis, irritant rhinitis, and infective rhinitis—are considered and clinically justified with reference to peer-reviewed literature.
- Patient Information and Chief Complaint: Demographics, HPI, history, and social background
- Review of Systems: Multi-system symptom review findings
- Objective Findings and Physical Examination: Vital signs, physical exam, and lab results
- Assessment and Primary Diagnosis: Allergic rhinitis identified as primary diagnosis
- Differential Diagnoses: Five alternative diagnoses with clinical rationale
- References: Peer-reviewed sources cited in paper
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The SOAP format is followed rigorously, with each section (Subjective, Objective, Assessment, Plan) presenting organized, clinically relevant information in the conventional order expected in primary care documentation.
- The differential diagnoses section is well-supported by peer-reviewed citations, with each alternative diagnosis linked to specific patient symptoms and clinical reasoning rather than listed generically.
- The review of systems is comprehensive and systematic, covering over a dozen body systems and using appropriate clinical language to confirm or deny findings.
Key academic technique demonstrated
This paper demonstrates evidence-based clinical reasoning: the student does not simply name alternative diagnoses but explains why each differential applies to this specific patient by connecting symptom presentation to published diagnostic criteria. Citations from peer-reviewed journals such as the New England Journal of Medicine and American Family Physician ground the assessment in authoritative medical literature.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with patient demographics and moves through the standard SOAP sequence: a detailed subjective section (HPI, medications, allergies, past and family/social history, and ROS), an objective section (vital signs, physical exam findings, and lab results), an assessment naming the primary diagnosis, and a differential diagnoses list. A references section closes the paper. The structure mirrors real clinical documentation practice, making it a strong model for healthcare students learning to write patient notes.
Patient Information and Chief Complaint
Patient: C., 28 years, Female, Caucasian
CC (Chief Complaint): Runny nose and itchy eyes.
HPI: A 28-year-old Caucasian female presents with a runny nose and itchy eyes that recur every spring. The symptoms usually last between six and eight weeks. The current episode has lasted nine days and is characterized by intermittent sneezing and a tickle in the throat. Claritin provides some relief but does not resolve symptoms completely. Symptom severity is rated 7/10 on the pain scale.
Current Medications: None.
Allergies: No known allergies.
PMHx: No previous hospitalizations for any ear, nose, or throat disorders. No trauma or surgeries to date. The patient is up-to-date on immunizations, with the last tetanus immunization administered in February 2022.
Social History: The patient was born and raised in Hoboken, NJ. She lives with her husband and works as a Sales Manager at a local retail store. Her home and workplace have working smoke detectors. She drinks alcohol and smokes at least twice a week but exercises regularly.
Family History: Her father, aged 55, has no significant medical history, while her mother, aged 47, has a history of hypertension. Her two siblings have no significant medical history. Her maternal grandmother died at age 76 with a history of hypertension, and her paternal grandfather died at age 82 with a history of Type II diabetes. Her paternal grandmother and maternal grandfather are still alive with histories of high blood pressure and Type II diabetes, respectively. Other family members, including aunts and uncles, have no significant medical history.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.