Andrew Jackson and the War on the Second Bank of the US
This paper examines Andrew Jackson's conflict with the Second Bank of the United States, tracing its origins in Jackson's distrust of private banking interests and paper currency. It analyzes the political maneuvering of Nicholas Biddle and Henry Clay, whose early recharter bid in 1832 prompted Jackson's decisive veto. The paper then explores how Jackson's landslide reelection validated his populist stance, and how his subsequent redirection of federal funds to state banks entrenched a laissez-faire economic philosophy that reverberated through American political history into the Progressive Era.
- Introduction: Jackson's Opposition to the Second Bank: Jackson's mistrust of privately owned federal banking
- The Problem with Paper Currency and Private Ownership: Inflationary risks of paper currency and investor control
- Nicholas Biddle, Henry Clay, and the Recharter Battle: Biddle's early recharter bid backed by political allies
- Jackson's Veto and the Election of 1832: Veto as populist strategy yielding landslide reelection
- Redirecting Federal Funds to State Banks: Federal deposits shifted to state banks after veto
- Lasting Effects on American Economic Policy: Laissez-faire legacy leading to Progressive Era reforms
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- It grounds the Bank War in concrete financial reasoning — the paper currency argument and the private ownership structure — before moving to the political narrative, giving the analysis economic depth.
- The use of specific electoral data (219 to 49) strengthens the claim about Jackson's popular mandate and avoids vague generalization.
- The conclusion successfully connects the episode to longer-term consequences, linking the Bank War to trust-busting and the Progressive Party without overstating the causal chain.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates cause-and-effect historical analysis: it identifies structural causes (private ownership, paper currency risks), then traces them through individual decisions (Biddle's early recharter bid, Jackson's veto) to measurable outcomes (election results, economic policy shifts). This layered causation model is a core technique in undergraduate history writing.
Structure breakdown
The essay opens with context and Jackson's underlying motivations, moves through the political conflict with Biddle and Clay, narrates the veto and its electoral consequences, and closes with a forward-looking assessment of policy legacy. The structure follows a clear problem–conflict–resolution–consequence arc across six logical sections.
Introduction: Jackson's Opposition to the Second Bank
Andrew Jackson's conflict with the Second Bank of the United States represented a crucial period in American history. In order to best understand the cause of the conflict, its repercussions, and the key players involved, it is necessary to return to the root of Jackson's opposition to such a financial institution. The bank essentially represented a misnomer, as it was in fact privately owned by wealthy businessmen — many of whose lineages and ties led back to Europe. In fact, the U.S. government owned only approximately one-fifth of the shares in this bank (Faragher et al., 2009, p. 282). Therefore, Jackson was extremely hesitant about the degree of power and relative autonomy he would deliver to private investors were the charter for the bank sanctioned by him.
The Problem with Paper Currency and Private Ownership
Another important reason that influenced Jackson's decision not to renew the charter was the nature of the banking industry itself, particularly the practices that the Second Bank of the United States would employ. The bank would largely be based upon paper currency, which is highly inflationary and a means to create panics, increase prices, and devalue whatever form of currency is in circulation. This is because paper currency is not backed by something with intrinsic value, such as gold, silver, or other forms of coinage. Jackson was not alone in his suspicion of the manipulability of paper currency, and this concern reinforced his opposition to the Second Bank of the United States.
Nicholas Biddle, Henry Clay, and the Recharter Battle
The stage was set for a confrontation between Jackson and the Bank largely due to the efforts of Nicholas Biddle, who was reinforced by political contemporaries — and opponents — of Jackson. The then-current 20-year charter of the Bank of the United States was set to expire in 1836, and Biddle decided to reapply for a new charter early in 1832. Congress endorsed his efforts by approving the Bank's recharter.
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.