This paper examines animal communication broadly — from chemical signals and vocalizations to bioluminescence and postural gestures — and evaluates whether any non-human communication system meets the criteria for true language. Drawing on Charles Hockett's thirteen design features of language, the paper surveys research on great apes using sign language and symbolic keyboards, Alex the African grey parrot's demonstrated conceptual abilities, and the sophisticated acoustic system of bottlenose dolphins. The paper also addresses regional dialects in animal populations and cross-species communication. It concludes that while no animal system fully satisfies all of Hockett's criteria, considerable evidence shows animals are capable of meaningful, complex communication.
The paper demonstrates criterion-based analysis: it introduces an established scholarly framework (Hockett's design features) early and then applies individual criteria as a lens for evaluating subsequent case study evidence. This technique is effective in comparative or evaluative essays because it prevents the discussion from becoming a loose list of facts and instead creates a coherent argument about what the evidence does and does not show.
The paper opens with a definition and overview of animal communication types, then introduces the linguistic debate over whether animal systems qualify as language. The central body moves through three case studies — parrots, great apes, and dolphins — each illustrating different dimensions of the language question. A brief conclusion synthesizes the findings without overclaiming. The structure follows a classic funnel-then-survey pattern: broad context → theoretical framework → specific evidence → synthesis.
Animal communication may be defined as the transmission of a signal from one animal to another such that the sender benefits, on average, from the response of the recipient (Pearce). According to Robert Mannell, this definition allows for the inclusion of many types of behavior and permits communication to be applied to a great range of animals. Natural animal communication can include chemical signals, smell, movement, posture, facial gestures, visual signals, and sound. The intent of these signals is to attract, repel, signal aggression or submission, advertise species, warn of predators, or communicate about the environment or the availability of food. These signals may be instinctive or learned from others.
Animals have many ways to communicate: whales sing, wolves howl, frogs croak, and birds chirp. Honeybees perform a waggle dance and dogs wag their tails. These are all ways animals transmit information to one another as well as to other species. Animals often use verbal and nonverbal forms of communication, including non-vocal auditory outbursts such as the slap of a dolphin's tail, bioluminescence, scent marking, chemical or tactile cues, visual cues, and postural gestures.
According to Jessika Toothman, not every member of a species' acoustic communication system sounds exactly alike. Animals in different regions are known to use different dialects. For example, one study found that blue whales produce different patterns of pulses, tones, and pitches depending on where they are from. Some bird species behave similarly. Interestingly, birds living on the border between territories of differing songsters often become "bilingual" and are capable of communicating in the singing style favored by each of their neighboring groups.
There is also evidence of communication between species. One study suggested that the reason Madagascan spiny-tailed iguanas have well-developed ears is so they can hear the warning calls of the Madagascan paradise flycatcher. The two species have nothing in common except that they share a general habitat and both fall prey to raptors. When an iguana hears a bird raise the alarm among other birds, it likely knows to be on alert for incoming predators as well (Toothman).
Some linguists have argued that language is a uniquely human behavior and that animal communication falls short of human language in a number of important ways. Humans possess an innate universal grammar that is not possessed by other species. This is demonstrated by the universality of language in human society and by the similarity of grammars across cultures. No natural non-human communication system shares this common grammar. Humans acquire language not because they are more intelligent, but because they possess certain species-specific mechanisms that are a prerequisite for language acquisition (Pearce).
Charles Hockett devised a list of thirteen criteria that a communication system must meet in order to be regarded as language. These design features are:
1) Vocal-auditory channel — sounds emitted from the mouth and perceived by the auditory system. This applies to many animal communication systems, but there are many exceptions. It does not apply to human sign language, which meets all of the other twelve requirements, nor does it apply to written language. 2) Broadcast transmission and directional reception — the recipient can identify the direction from which the signal originates and thus the source of the signal. 3) Rapid fading — the signal lasts only a short time. This is true of all systems involving sound, though it does not account for audio recording technology and does not apply to written language. It also tends not to apply to animal signals involving chemicals and smells, which often fade slowly. 4) Interchangeability — all utterances that can be understood can also be produced. This differs from some communication systems in which, for example, males produce one set of behaviors and females another, and neither can interchange these messages. 5) Total feedback — the sender of a message also perceives that message; that is, you hear what you say. This is not always true of some kinds of animal displays. 6) Specialization — the signal produced is specialized for communication and is not a side effect of some other behavior; for example, a dog's panting incidentally produces a sound but that sound is not specialized for communication. 7) Semanticity — there is a fixed relationship between a signal and a meaning. 8) Arbitrariness — there is an arbitrary relationship between a signal and its meaning; the signal is related to the meaning by convention or instinct but has no inherent connection to it. This can be seen in the fact that different words in different languages refer to the same meaning, or that different calls of different subspecies of a single bird species can carry the same meaning. 9) Discreteness — language is built up from discrete units, such as phonemes in human language. Exchanging such discrete units causes an abrupt change in the meaning of a signal, rather than a continuous one. 10) Displacement — the ability to communicate about things or events that are distant in time or space. Bee dancing is a well-known example of this. 11) Productivity — language is an open system; it is possible to produce a potentially infinite number of different messages by combining elements in different ways. 12) Traditional transmission — each generation learns the communication system from the preceding one. Many species produce uniform calls regardless of where they live, even across a range spanning several continents; such systems are assumed to be genetically defined by instinct. On the other hand, some animals do develop the calls of their species even when raised in isolation. 13) Duality of patterning — large numbers of meaningful signals (morphemes or words) are produced from a small number of meaningless units (phonemes).
Spoken human language is extremely difficult or impossible for most animals because of the structure of their vocal organs. Apes, for example, cannot produce a large proportion of the vowels and would have difficulty with many consonants. This may be due not only to the shape of the vocal organs but also to the limitations of the motor centers in the brain that control them. Apes have, however, been taught to use language involving hand gestures, sign language, or the manipulation of symbols. Some birds — such as certain parrots and the Indian hill mynah — are able to mimic human speech with great clarity. Dolphins cannot be taught either type of language but may be able to understand sounds or gestures and to respond by pressing specially designed levers.
The fact that a species lacks a complex communication system in the wild does not necessarily prove that it is incapable of using one. No animal communication system fulfills all of the criteria outlined by Hockett; however, in 1977 Irene Pepperberg decided to explore what was on another creature's mind by attempting direct communication, and she acquired a one-year-old African grey parrot. When Pepperberg began her work with the parrot — whom she named Alex — it was widely believed that animals were incapable of thought, and were only able to react to stimuli without any capacity to think or feel.
Certain skills — such as good memory, a grasp of grammar and symbols, self-awareness, understanding others' motives, imitating others, and being creative — are considered key signs of higher mental ability. Researchers have gradually documented these talents in other species, steadily narrowing what was once thought to be exclusively human while offering clues about the origins of our own abilities. Scrub jays know that other jays are thieves and that stashed food can spoil; sheep can recognize faces; chimpanzees use a variety of tools to probe termite mounds and have even been observed using weapons to hunt small mammals; dolphins can imitate human postures; and the archerfish, which stuns insects with a sudden blast of water, can learn to aim its squirt simply by watching an experienced fish perform the task (Morell).
Pepperberg did not claim that Alex used language, saying instead that he used a two-way communication code. The bird could identify 50 different objects, recognize quantities up to six, distinguish seven colors and five shapes, and understand the concepts of bigger, smaller, same, and different. Alex had a vocabulary of approximately 150 words and appeared to understand what he said. Pepperberg was training Alex to recognize English phonemes in the hope that he would conceptually link an English written word with its spoken equivalent. He could identify sounds made by two-letter combinations such as "SH" (Morell).
It is clear that we can communicate with some animals to some extent. Great apes have learned languages based on hand gestures and symbols. Parrots can learn to speak words and even use those words to demonstrate conceptual understanding. Many animals can learn to respond to hand gestures and voice commands. Research shows that humans have the ability to convey meaning to animals of almost any kind. By recording animal sounds and playing them back, we can attract their attention or elicit the same behavior as the original call. In some cases, researchers have modified signals and elicited correspondingly modified behavior. These and other experiments help shed light on how, and to what extent, animals can communicate.
You’re 83% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.