This paper examines three core concepts in the study of popular culture as discussed by Anne Cranny-Francis. It begins by explaining the "way of operating" definition of popular culture — borrowed from Morris — and why it is considered the most useful framework in cultural studies. The paper then explores the social and political effects of the historical distinction between high and popular culture, arguing that this binary has lost validity in contemporary society. Finally, it addresses the concept of representation, its relationship to reality, and how analyzing representations in popular culture can illuminate broader social values and power dynamics.
The paper demonstrates effective theoretical paraphrase: it restates complex academic definitions (such as the "way of operating" framework) in plain language while preserving the core meaning and attributing ideas correctly to their sources. This is a foundational skill in cultural studies writing, where engaging with theory accurately without over-quoting is essential.
The paper is organized as three discrete question-and-answer responses. The first section defines popular culture and defends a particular theoretical framework. The second critiques the high/popular culture binary on historical and social grounds. The third introduces representation as a concept, explains its limits relative to reality, and connects it to cultural analysis. Each section is self-contained yet builds on the theoretical vocabulary established earlier.
Borrowing from Morris's definition of popular culture, Anne Cranny-Francis describes popular culture as a way of operating. Under this framework, whether or not a work of art is considered popular culture depends on how the art is produced and how it is consumed. Something becomes popular culture because of how it is used within a culture and how it is incorporated into people's lives. Popular culture, in this sense, becomes a way of understanding the society in which one lives.
Cranny-Francis finds Morris's definition useful because it places the emphasis on the relationship between the viewer and the work of art. She believes that popular culture is about formulating questions concerning both the society that exists and the society that people wish existed, as well as the interrelationships among people within society. However, Cranny-Francis cautions that one should not assume all works are given equivalent value within the culture; some cultures maintain distinctions among varieties of popular culture.
Cranny-Francis considers the definition of popular culture as a way of operating to be the most widely accepted in cultural studies because it avoids the problems raised by alternative definitions. Furthermore, this framework appears to be enacted in the textual practice of contemporary texts, whether those texts are regarded as popular culture or as postmodern. As a result, literary criticism has developed to examine works of art in relation to their consumption and creation. One important aspect of this trend is that the critic of popular culture is not objective or impassive — the criticism of popular culture interacts with the very method by which the art is consumed.
Traditionally, high culture was the culture of the ruling class, tied to the upper levels of the educational system. The categories of high and popular culture presupposed a correlation between culture and class: high culture was aimed at the dominant class, and popular culture at the subordinate class. However, because there is no longer a single ruling class or aristocracy, the modern cultural system does not have one center. Furthermore, the methods of production and consumption once confined to the elite — such as purchasing books and the ability to read — have become accessible to the masses, blurring the line between high and popular culture. The idea that one type of culture appeals exclusively to those in power or those out of power is therefore outdated.
Representation encompasses both how the media portray events, people, and ideas and how those portrayals influence the real world of events, people, and ideas. Representation is both a process and a product. While representation seeks to present a version of reality, it is not reality itself — a representation is not the same as the thing it represents. The second element of representation is that it is judged on how accurately and faithfully it reflects reality.
Each representation is the result of a series of value judgments made according to the shared expectations of both the producer and the consumer of that representation. In essence, what is represented is nothing more than a series of choices, and the difference between representation and reality can be measured by examining those choices.
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.