Anti-Semitism in the Synoptic Gospels: Harrington's Analysis
This paper reviews Daniel J. Harrington's The Synoptic Gospels Set Free (2009), which examines how anti-Jewish sentiment became embedded in Christian scripture, particularly in the Gospel of Matthew. The paper explores Harrington's three-part approach: identifying common ground between Christians and Jews, offering new interpretive frameworks for reading the synoptic gospels, and providing historical and cultural context to help preachers address anti-Semitism honestly. Special attention is given to Matthew's concept of supersessionism, the parable of the vineyard, and the broader socio-political implications of anti-Jewish gospel passages for contemporary interfaith dialogue.
- Introduction: Anti-Semitism and Christian Scripture: Anti-Semitic potential embedded in gospel texts
- Harrington's Framework for Reinterpreting the Synoptic Gospels: Harrington's three-part approach to reinterpretation
- Matthew's Gospel and the Problem of Supersessionism: Matthew's anti-Jewish tone and supersessionist theology
- The Parable of the Vineyard: Political and Religious Dimensions: Vineyard parable as political and religious allegory
- Implications for Christian Preaching and Interfaith Dialogue: Calls for reformed preaching and interfaith apology
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper stays closely tied to a single primary source (Harrington, 2009), consistently citing specific arguments and page references to ground its claims.
- It moves logically from broad theological context to specific textual analysis, ending with practical implications for preaching and interfaith dialogue.
- The writing balances critical analysis with fair representation of Harrington's nuanced positions, avoiding oversimplification of a sensitive topic.
Key academic technique demonstrated
This paper demonstrates effective critical book review technique: the author summarizes Harrington's three-part argumentative structure, evaluates specific examples (such as the parable of the vineyard and the concept of supersessionism), and connects textual analysis to real-world consequences for Christian-Jewish relations. This layered approach — summary, analysis, application — is a hallmark of strong graduate-level theological writing.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with an overview of Harrington's thesis and methodology, then narrows to a focused case study of Matthew's Gospel. It examines supersessionism as a theological concept before analyzing the parable of the vineyard in both political and religious terms. The conclusion broadens back out to argue for practical reforms in Christian preaching and interfaith dialogue, giving the paper a satisfying funnel-then-flare structure.
Introduction: Anti-Semitism and Christian Scripture
Anti-Semitism has practically been embedded into Christian doctrine. As Harrington (2009) points out, "certain Gospel texts have fostered anti-Judaism," and "one can say that the Gospels may have an anti-Jewish potential" (p. 1). This is true in spite of the fact that many of the authors of the gospels might have self-identified as Jews, or were at least writing from a Jewish consciousness and Jewish point of view for a largely Jewish audience. To extricate anti-Semitism from the synoptic gospels (Matthew, Mark, and Luke) seems challenging.
Harrington's Framework for Reinterpreting the Synoptic Gospels
Harrington (2009) is willing to accept the challenge by first showing that the wisdom contained in the synoptic gospels reveals "common ground" between peoples of the book (p. 2). Second, Harrington (2009) offers new frameworks for reading the synoptic gospels so as not to impose anti-Semitism or to misinterpret the author's original meaning. Finally, the author offers important social, cultural, and historical contexts that can help clarify the presence of anti-Semitism and assist contemporary Christian preachers in addressing it more honestly in their sermons. Ultimately, Harrington writes the book to "caution Christian teachers and preachers" about material that perpetuates anti-Semitism, essentially teaching a new type of biblical literacy.
Matthew's Gospel and the Problem of Supersessionism
Matthew's Gospel has the most anti-Jewish potential of all the synoptic gospels because its content is often expressly and overtly anti-Semitic. Matthew is more anti-establishment than he is anti-Jewish per se, and yet he directs his criticisms squarely at Jewish leaders and those who deny Christ. Moreover, Matthew was devoutly committed to the new covenant model, also known as supersessionism. Supersessionism refers to the Christian belief that Christ rendered Jewish law, custom, and tradition irrelevant and even sacrilegious — that Christ's Church superseded the Jewish religion. Denying Christ is therefore effectively denying God, from Matthew's point of view.
In this sense, Matthew is more evangelical and radical than he is specifically anti-Semitic. Yet he does direct his wrath toward the Jewish religion and the social and political structures that defined it in his time. Matthew's audience would have responded in different ways depending on their backgrounds. For those who followed Christ, they would have found political solace in his anti-establishment views.
References
Bergant, D. (n.d.). Preaching the New Lectionary. Collegeville, MN: The Liturgical Press.
Harrington, D. J. (2009). The Synoptic Gospels Set Free.
Pilch, J. J. (1995). The Cultural World of Jesus. Collegeville, MN: The Liturgical Press.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.