This paper examines organizational performance measurement through financial, market, and shareholder return metrics, using Apple Inc. as a primary case study. It identifies three criteria for discovering quality problems — internal failure costs, appraisal costs, and external failure costs — and evaluates Apple's existing performance improvement programs, including R&D investment, employee training centers, and a Supplier Diversity Program. The paper concludes with four strategic recommendations: mandating ISO 9000 certification for suppliers, implementing continuous improvement programs, positioning internal monitors at supplier facilities, and cultivating transformational leadership to sustain Apple's competitive advantage following the loss of Steve Jobs.
Organizational performance can be measured in terms of financial results, output metrics, or market share. An organization is considered high-performing when it demonstrates growth across all aspects of its performance metrics. The three key criteria used to measure organizational performance across industries are as follows:
Financial performance (profits, return on assets)
Product and market performance (sales, market share)
Shareholder returns (total shareholder return, economic value added)
An organization can generally claim healthy financial performance if its annual net profits continuously increase or if the company meets its own internal financial targets. Product and market performance is measured by an organization's ability to claim a significant share of total sales volume in the market. It is generally understood that by producing high-quality goods or services, organizations will be better positioned to achieve their desired market performance (Richard, 2009).
Apple Inc. serves as a prominent example of this principle. The company became an industry leader by producing high-quality products for its target market, and that commitment to quality directly translated into stronger financial and market outcomes. Between fiscal years 2009 and 2010, Apple increased its net sales by 52% and grew its net income from $8,235 million to $14,013 million, which in turn produced cumulative increases in shareholder earnings (Thomas, 2008; Apple Annual Report, 2010).
There are three criteria that organizations can use to identify problems and uncover opportunities for quality improvement. The first involves internal failure costs associated with quality standards. By monitoring these costs, organizations can discover quality issues before goods reach the market. In many cases, defective products can be identified and corrected internally, and this method can also be used to verify that quality improvement processes are working effectively.
A second criterion, somewhat similar in nature, is appraisal costs — expenditures an organization incurs in order to uncover defects. This approach includes quality inspections, product testing, and auditing. These activities help identify problems and strengthen quality improvement standards. The third option is the use of external failure costs, which involves analyzing recalled or defective products that have already reached customers. For example, an automaker might recall vehicles due to a brake system malfunction, or a food manufacturer might recall products because of bacterial contamination.
External failure costs should be treated as a last resort. Relying on customer-facing failures to identify and correct quality problems can cause lasting reputational damage to a firm — damage severe enough to threaten its existence virtually overnight (Reid & Sanders, 2010). To prevent quality problems from escalating to this stage, organizations should implement a continuous performance improvement program.
"Apple's R&D, training, and supplier diversity initiatives"
"ISO certification, continuous improvement, and leadership succession"
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.