This paper examines how organizations should respond to the discovery of incriminating historical records — what the author terms "archives of evil." It argues that legal counsel is essential to evaluating which past behaviors may be protected by older laws and which expose the company to litigation. The paper further contends that preventing future misconduct requires revising ambiguous ethical codes, implementing internal checks and balances, and keeping corporate policy aligned with evolving laws on data protection and copyright. Throughout, the author emphasizes transparency, accountability, and the futility of attempting to destroy or conceal damaging evidence.
The "archives of evil" contain truths, and those truths may come to light given the increased access to data that technological advancement and legislation has provided. Organizations that harbor incriminating historical records face both legal exposure and reputational risk — and neither can be wished away.
Legal counsel provides the essential backbone of any company-wide policy aimed at rectifying the problems of the past and mitigating future losses. The organization must hire specialists who can examine the archives of evil to first determine which behaviors could be "grandfathered" under older laws and which cannot. Any issues that remain targets of possible litigation must be dealt with immediately if the organization hopes to thrive and retain its integrity among potential investors.
Assuming that incriminating evidence can be obliterated or erased would be one of the gravest mistakes an organization could make. Duplicate copies of reports, backups of digital data, and — of course — whistleblower word of mouth all point to the events of the past. Managers must face the mistakes their predecessors made and take ethical and legal steps to get the company on the right track.
In many cases, past problems may not haunt current employees. Quality legal counsel can assure managers that past transgressions will be the legal and ethical responsibility of the managers who committed them, not those who inherited the organization.
"Revising ethical codes and internal governance structures"
"Aligning data practices with evolving law and transparency norms"
You’re 54% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.