Aristophanes' Plutus: Poverty, Wealth, and Moral Justice
This paper examines Aristophanes' Plutus, the playwright's last surviving comedy, which addresses the moral dimensions of poverty and wealth. The analysis traces the plot from Chremylus's complaint to the oracle of Apollo — that honest men remain poor while scoundrels prosper — through his encounter with the blind god Plutus and their subsequent effort to restore just distribution of riches. The paper discusses the roles of the three central characters, Chremylus, Cario, and Plutus, and explores key themes including divine jealousy, the ethics of wealth, and the tension between poverty and justice. Brief attention is also given to the allegorical figure of Poverty and the play's solemn conclusion.
- Introduction to Plutus and Its Central Concerns: Overview of the play and its main characters
- The Complaint of Chremylus and the Role of Cario: Chremylus questions why the just remain poor
- The Encounter with Plutus and His Blindness: Zeus blinds Plutus out of jealousy for mankind
- The Case for Just Distribution of Wealth: Cario and Chremylus persuade Plutus to act
- Encounters Along the Journey and the Play's Conclusion: Allegorical meetings and the play's resolution
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper uses direct quotations from the primary text to support each analytical point, grounding observations in the actual dialogue rather than paraphrase alone.
- It traces the plot chronologically while simultaneously drawing out the ethical themes, allowing narrative summary and analysis to reinforce each other.
- The characters are introduced with clear roles that illuminate the comedy's moral argument, making the allegorical structure accessible to a general reader.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates primary-text close reading: each claim about character motivation or theme is immediately supported by a passage from the play. This technique is especially effective for comedy analysis, where tone and word choice carry as much meaning as plot events.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a brief critical orientation, situating Plutus within Aristophanes' corpus. It then follows the play's own sequence — the oracle, the encounter with Plutus, the debate about poverty, and the journey toward wealth redistribution — before closing with a note on the play's resolution. Each section is anchored by quoted dialogue, giving the analysis a close-reading texture throughout.
Introduction to Plutus and Its Central Concerns
Plutus is the last extant comedy of Aristophanes, and it focuses on the moral dimensions of poverty, viewing riches from an ethical standpoint. The play has often been considered the least significant of all Aristophanes' comedies, yet it possesses its own charm and appeal for those familiar with his comic style. The play features many characters, but the three most important are Plutus (the god of riches), Chremylus (a just man), and Cario — also spelled Carion — Chremylus' servant.
The Complaint of Chremylus and the Role of Cario
The story begins when Chremylus complains to the oracle of Apollo that only scoundrels and wicked people grow wealthy while the just and righteous remain poor. Cario is deeply unhappy with the situation and cannot understand why his master has abandoned the worship of the gods:
"Aye, master, unless you tell me why we are following this unknown fellow, I will not be silent, but I will worry and torment you, for you cannot beat me because of my sacred chaplet of laurel."
Cario continues to torment Chremylus and demands an answer, wanting to know why his master no longer wishes to remain a just man. Chremylus, who has always lived a morally upright life, explains:
"I will reveal it to you as being the most faithful and the most rascally of all my servants. I honoured the gods and did what was right, and yet I was none the less poor and unfortunate... Others amassed wealth — the sacrilegious, the demagogues, the informers, indeed every sort of rascal."
Cario is then told why Chremylus is following a blind man named Plutus rather than the gods. Chremylus explains that he consulted the oracle and was advised to follow the guidance of the first man he met upon leaving the Temple. Plutus was that man. When Cario challenges his master and demands to know who Plutus is, Plutus responds in an equally blunt and rough manner, prompting Cario to remark sarcastically: "Ah! what a pleasant fellow and what a delightful prophecy the god has given you!"
The Encounter with Plutus and His Blindness
Upon discovering Plutus' identity, both Cario and Chremylus are stunned. They cannot comprehend why the god of riches is in such a wretched condition:
"You, Plutus, and in this piteous guise! Oh, Phoebus Apollo! oh, ye gods of heaven and hell! Oh, Zeus! is it really and truly as you say?"
Plutus explains that because he had intended to distribute riches only among the just and virtuous, Zeus turned against him and took away his sight:
"Zeus inflicted it on me, because of his jealousy of mankind. When I was young, I threatened him that I would only go to the just, the wise, the men of ordered life; to prevent my distinguishing these, he struck me with blindness — so much does he envy the good!"
This divine jealousy forms the ethical core of the play: the gods themselves are implicated in the unjust arrangement that keeps good people poor.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.